Lucknow Development Authority has crossed every limit of corruption which is quite obvious from repeated arbitrary reply

 

Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2024/0006965

Grievance Concerns To

Name Of Complainant

Yogi M. P. Singh

Date of Receipt

30/01/2024

Received By Ministry/Department

Uttar Pradesh

Grievance Description

This application is on behalf of Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Angad Prasad Singh who is senior citizen. Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Angad Prasad Singh is a victim of corruption in Lucknow Development Authority.

1-First page of the attached PDF document is the arbitrary and inconsistent parrot report dated 29 December 2023 of Atul Krishna Singh, deputy secretary of L.D.A. submitted in the grievance of the applicant registered as Grievance Status for registration number: GOVUP/E/2023/0081676 Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant-Keshav Pratap Singh alias Tantrik K P Singh, Date of Receipt-09/12/2023, Received By Ministry/Department-Uttar Pradesh.

2-It is quite obvious from the second page of the attached PDF document it is the communication of the special executive officer of the Lucknow development authority mister Rajiv Kumar dated 6th February 2020 in which you have inform the applicant Dinesh Pratap Singh that you are taking action in the matter for that very purpose you have summoned requisite documents from the allottees. Which is still awaited on the part of allottees.

2-Numerous communications were exchange with the allottees by the Lucknow development authority but it is most unfortunate that committee members could not succeed to get documents as allottees failed to provide the requisite documents which are essential to prove the right of allottees on the allotted land because they had already sold all the five plots to the applicant.

3-Subsequently Lucknow development authority formed an enquiry committee into the matter consisting of three members and this committee is making enquiries to check the anomalies made during the execution of the registry of the impugned land.

4-It is quite obvious that setup committee of the Lucknow development authority is also seeking documents from the applicant and those documents were made available to the concerned staff who made the communication with the applicant but fortunately he has been transferred to the other desk by the competent authority so informed that he is not posted at the same place now he has been posted to the other desk which is the root cause documents sent by the applicant Dinesh Pratap Singh did not reach to the committee.

5-The next three pages of this PDF document attached to the grievance is the power of attorney provided by the Babu Singh to the applicant.

Subsequently, in the next four pages of the attached PDF document to the grievance, is the agreement made between Babu Singh and the applicant regarding the five plots which is under dispute? The next page is the receipt of the payment made by the applicant to the allottees through Babu Singh.

6-It is quite obvious that the next two pages in the attached PDF document is the electricity bill of the applicant when the applicant was living in the house sold by the Babu Singh in the impugned plot which was later grabbed by allottees under monitoring of Guddi/Aradhana/Anuradha W/O Babu Singh provided by the Babu Singh because of the arbitrariness of the Lucknow development authority who overlooked the order of the Lucknow bench of high court of judicature at Allahabad.

7- Next for pages of the attached PDF document is the affidavit of the Satyesh Prakash Dwivedi sub inspector of police station Ashiana, district-Lucknow submitted in the Lucknow bench of the high court of judicature at Allahabad.

8- It is quite obvious that the next two pages of the attached PDF document is the communication of the property officer of the Lucknow development authority to Ajay Singh and Guddi regarding the objection made by the applicant before registry of the impugned land.

9- It is quite obvious that next three pages are the order passed by the Lucknow bench of the high court of judicature at Allahabad which must be perused by the respected members of the committee which was violated by the staff of the Lucknow development authority who executed the registry of the land.

Grievance Document

Current Status

Case closed   

Date of Action

17/02/2024

Remarks

Please see the attachment

Reply Document

Rating

1

Poor

Rating Remarks

It is quite obvious from the representation that this representation has been submitted to provide the requisite documents to the Lucknow Development Authority which is being sought by them from the aggrieved Dinesh Pratap Singh, but it is most unfortunate that they are not capable to understand the contents of the representation. Think about the anarchy prevailed in the working of the Lucknow Development Authority who are not providing information under right to information act 2005 in the name that committee has been formed in the matter and they are seeking documents from the party for more than two years. Whether it is proper way to curb the corruption from government machinery by the Yogi government who is claiming to provide corruption free governance to the people in the state as claimed by both Yogi and Modi time and again. Undoubtedly parliamentary elections are coming close and they will again claim to provide corruption free governance. Where is corruption free governance?

Appeal Details

Appeal Number

Date of Receipt

Appeal Text

Current Status

Officer Concerns To

Officer Name

Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary)

Organisation name

Government of Uttar Pradesh

Contact Address

Chief Minister Secretariat , Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow

Email Address

bhaskar.12214@gov.in

Contact Number

05222226350

Reminder(s) / Clarification(s)

Reminder Date

Remarks

30/01/2024

10-It is quite obvious that next three pages are the affidavits submitted by Babu Singh, Guddi Singh and Kanishk Kumar Singh before L.D.A. to get plots which contain false and misleading information.

This is a humble request of the applicant that committee members of the Lucknow development authority looking into irregularities in allocation of land and executing of registry may take the perusal of the attached document of the 24 pages before taking any decision in the matter.

Grievance Status for registration number: GOVUP/E/2023/0087151, Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant-Keshav Pratap Singh alias Tantrik K P Singh, Date of Receipt-31/12/2023, Received By Ministry/Department-Uttar Pradesh

Rating Remarks-Officer Name Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary) Organisation name Government of Uttar Pradesh Contact Address Chief Minister Secretariat, Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow Current Status-Case closed, Date of Action-16/01/2024 Remarks-Please see the attachment Mr. Bhaskar Pandey can you tell the applicant where is the attachment? Think about the credibility of the chief minister office of government which did not attach the document and just saying in the comment please see the attachment which is a mockery of the law of land and action must be taken against the corrupt staff but who will bell the cat when most are corrupt in the government? Our chief minister Yogi Adityanath only makes comments regarding the bad working style of the public staff but he is failed to take action against the dereliction of the public staff which is the root cause of this anarchy. Where is the good governance in this largest democracy in the world? Good governance is only a dream.

To see the attached document to the grievance, please click on the link

Yogi

An anti-corruption crusader. Motive to build a strong society based on the principle of universal brotherhood. Human rights defender and RTI activist. Working for the betterment of societies and as an anti-corruption crusader for more than 25 years. Our sole motive is to raise the voices of weaker and downtrodden sections of the society and safeguard their human rights. Our motive is to promote the religion of universal brotherhood among the various castes communities of different religions. Man is great by his deeds and character.

Post a Comment

Whatever comments you make, it is your responsibility to use facts. You may not make unwanted imputations against any body which may be baseless otherwise commentator itself will be responsible for the derogatory remarks made against any body proved to be false at any appropriate forum.

Previous Post Next Post