Police must take perusal of RTI applications and supporting documents then provide information otherwise appeals are made

 



Registration Number SPMZR/A/2024/60002

Name Yogi M P Singh

Date of Filing 09/01/2024

Status RTI APPEAL RECEIVED as on 09/01/2024

  Nodal Officer Details  

Name AJAY KUMAR SINGH

Telephone Number 9454401105

Email-ID addlspopmzr@gmail.com

Online RTI Appeal Form Details

Public Authority Details :-  

* Public Authority SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE OFFICE MIRZAPUR 

Personal Details:-

* Name Yogi M P Singh

Gender Male

* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road, Sangmohal post office

Districts Mirzapur

Pincode 231001

State Uttar Pradesh

Educational Status Literate

Phone Number Details not provided

Mobile Number +91-7379105911

Email-ID yogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com

Citizenship Indian

* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No

First Appeal Details u/s 19(1) :-

Registration Number SPMZR/A/2024/60002

Date of Filing 09/01/2024

Concerned Appellate Authority Nodal Officer

Phone No Details not provided.

Email Id Details not provided.

* Ground For Appeal Refused access to Information Requested

((Description of Information sought (up to 500 characters) )

* Prayer or Relief Sought Registration Number SPMZR/R/2023/80020, Name Yogi M P Singh, Date of Filing 04/10/2023, Status REQUEST DISPOSED OF as on 14/11/2023 

The appellant sought following information from the public information officer.

1- Public information officer may provide the name and designation of the staff who are processing the following email sent to the public authority by the information seeker. to: sp-cyber.lu@up.gov.in date: 2 Sept 2023, 09:57

Provided information- The report has been sent already to the cyber cell regarding the aforementioned representation by the investigation officer.  

Submission- The appellant is seeking the name and designation of the staff processing the email application to: sp-cyber.lu@up.gov.in date: 2 Sept 2023, 09:57.

 2- Public information officer may provide the minutes of the proceedings made by the public authority regarding the following email. 

Provided information- The aforementioned information is concerned with the cyber cell Lucknow. 

Submission- If the information is concerned with the cyber cell Lucknow, then it had to be transferred to the cyber cell Lucknow under subsection 3 of section 6 of the right to information act 2005 but it was not done.  

3- Public information officer may provide the noting made by the accountable official of the public authority endorsing the following email and the action, consequently, also provide next proceeding made in the matter. 

Provided information- The aforementioned information is concerned with the cyber cell Lucknow. 

Submission- If the information is concerned with the cyber cell Lucknow, then it had to be transferred to the cyber cell Lucknow under subsection 3 of section 6 of the right to information act 2005, but it was not done. 

4- Public information officer may provide the action details taken by the public authority regarding the email of this information seeker.

This information was denied by the public information officer by taking the recourse of subsection 1J of section 8 of the right to information act 2005 illegally. Subsection1(j) of Section 8 of the right to information act 2005 states that information which relates to personal information the disclosure of which has not relationship to any public activity or interest, or which would cause unwarranted invasion of the privacy of the individual unless the Central Public Information Officer or the State Public Information Officer or the appellate authority, as the case may be, is satisfied that the larger public interest justifies the disclosure of such information: 

Provided that the information, which cannot be denied to the Parliament or a State Legislature shall not be denied to any person.  

5- Public information officer may provide the copy of the documents exchanged by the public authority with the local office of the anti-cyber-crime in the district Mirzapur.

 This information was also denied by the public information officer by taking the recourse of subsection 1J of section 8 of the right to information act 2005 illegally.

Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))

RTI Application Details u/s 6(1) :-

Registration Number SPMZR/R/2023/80020

Date of Filing 04/10/2023

PIO of Public Authority approached mahesh singh atri

Designation mirzapur

Phone No 9454401105

Email Id addlspopmzr@gmail.com

PIO Order/Decision Number Details not provided.

* PIO Order/Decision Date

To see the attached document to the online RTI appeal, please click on the link

Yogi

An anti-corruption crusader. Motive to build a strong society based on the principle of universal brotherhood. Human rights defender and RTI activist. Working for the betterment of societies and as an anti-corruption crusader for more than 25 years. Our sole motive is to raise the voices of weaker and downtrodden sections of the society and safeguard their human rights. Our motive is to promote the religion of universal brotherhood among the various castes communities of different religions. Man is great by his deeds and character.

3 Comments

Whatever comments you make, it is your responsibility to use facts. You may not make unwanted imputations against any body which may be baseless otherwise commentator itself will be responsible for the derogatory remarks made against any body proved to be false at any appropriate forum.

  1. Police is failed to curb the cyber criminal activities which is growing like Jungle fire in our society. Think about the gravity of situation even money in the bank accounts are no more safe because of the fraudulent elements having the support of the government. Police personnel are so incompetent that they are failed to work out the cases of cyber fraud

    ReplyDelete
  2. Think about the gravity of situation public information officer in the office of superintendent of police without taking perusal of the RTI applications submits the report on the RTI portal of the Government of Uttar Pradesh and most surprising thing is that these reports are inconsistent with the information sought by the information seeker.

    ReplyDelete
  3. उत्तर प्रदेश की पुलिस कोई भी सूचना नागरिकों को नहीं दे रही है सूचना अधिकार 2005 के तहत जो की सूचना अधिकार 2005 के प्रावधानों का खुला उल्लंघन है किंतु इस अराजकता में कौन जवाब देही तय करेगा यदि प्रशासक खुद अराजक हो तो सुशासन की अपेक्षा कैसे की जा सकती है

    ReplyDelete
Previous Post Next Post