Registration Number UPICM/R/2024/60119
Name Yogi M P Singh
Date of Filing 29/02/2024
Status RTI REQUEST RECEIVED as on 29/02/2024
Nodal Officer Details
Name TEJASKAR PANDEY
Telephone Number 05222724941
Email-ID
Online RTI Request Form Details
Public Authority Details :-
* Public Authority Uttar Pradesh Information Commission
Personal Details of RTI Applicant:-
Registration Number UPICM/R/2024/60119
Date of Filing 29/02/2024
* Name Yogi M P Singh
Gender Male
* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road, Sangmohal post office
Districts Mirzapur
Pincode 231001
State Uttar Pradesh
Educational Status Literate
Above Graduate
Phone Number Details not provided
Mobile Number +91-7379105911
Email-ID yogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
Citizenship Indian
* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No
RTI Application Details u/s 6(1) :-
((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )
* Description of Information Sought According to subsection I d of section 4 of the right to information act 2005, it shall be obligatory duty of every public authority to provide the reasons for its decisions to parties concerned. Most respected Supreme Court of India quoted in its various judgments that right to reason is an indispensable part of a sound judicial system and it is not only applicable in the judiciary but for better administration it must be applicable in the administrative system. It is quite obvious that Uttar Pradesh state information commission is a quasi-judicial body.
From the messages sent by the Uttar Pradesh state information commission it is quite obvious that the following second appeals submitted by the appellant were arbitrarily rejected by the research officer of the Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission.
1-Registration number A-20240100181 of the diary number submitted by you to the U.P. Information Commission has been rejected by the Research Officer and forwarded to the Registrar for verification for signature.
Public information officer must provide the reason for rejecting the second appeal by the research officer of the Uttar Pradesh state information commission.
2-Registration number A-20240200085 of the diary number submitted by you to the U.P. Information Commission has been rejected by the Research Officer and forwarded to the Registrar for verification for signature.
Public information officer must provide the reason for rejecting the second appeal by the research officer of the Uttar Pradesh state information commission.
3-Registration number A-20240200151 of the diary number submitted by you to the U.P. Information Commission has been rejected by the Research Officer and forwarded to the Registrar for verification for signature.
Public information officer must provide the reason for rejecting the second appeal by the research officer of the Uttar Pradesh state information commission.
4-Registration number A-20240200173 of the diary number submitted by you to the U.P. Information Commission has been rejected by the Research Officer and forwarded to the Registrar for verification for signature.
Public information officer must provide the reason for rejecting the second appeal by the research officer of the Uttar Pradesh state information commission.5-Registration number A-20240200174 of the diary number submitted by you to the U.P. Information Commission has been rejected by the Research Officer and forwarded to the Registrar for verification for signature.
Public information officer must provide the reason for rejecting the second appeal by the research officer of the Uttar Pradesh state information commission.
The Right to Information Act 2005 was introduced by the government of India to promote transparency and accountability in working of the public authorities but it seems that such cryptic dealings of the officers like the research officer of Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission are itself hindering blocks in seeking information to the information seekers.
This is a humble request to the public information officer to provide these five-points in formation within stipulated 30 days as prescribed under subsection 1 of section 7 of the right to information act 2005.
This is a humble request to the accountable public staff in the Uttar Pradesh state information commission to overcome this anarchy that originated from arbitrariness in the working of the concerned public staff.
* Concerned PIO Nodal Officer
Designation Details not provided
Phone No Details not provided
Email Id Details not provided
Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB)) Supporting document not provided