Shakti Mohan Awasthi Designation-Ad. Deputy Commissioner of Police has been habitual not to provide information ipso facto


Your RTI Appeal filed successfully.

Please note down the details of registration.

Registration Number :PCGBN/A/2024/60024

Name :Yogi M P Singh

Date of Filing :16-02-2024


 Contact Details  

Telephone Number :8595902504


Online RTI Appeal Form Details

Public Authority Details :-  


Personal Details:-

* Name Yogi M P Singh

Gender Male

* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road, Sangmohal post office

Districts Mirzapur

Pincode 231001

State Uttar Pradesh

Educational Status Literate

Phone Number Details not provided

Mobile Number +91-7379105911

Email-ID yogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com

Citizenship Indian

* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No

First Appeal Details u/s 19(1) :-

Registration Number PCGBN/A/2024/60024

Date of Filing 16/02/2024

Concerned Appellate Authority Nodal Officer

Phone No Details not provided

Email Id Details not provided

* Ground For Appeal Refused access to Information Requested

((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )

* Prayer or Relief Sought A-20240200203 Yogi M P Singh Public Information Officer Office - POLICE COMMISSIONERATE GAUTAMBUDHNAGAR 12/02/2024 

To Chief Information Commissioner/ Companion Information Commissioners 7/7A, RTI Bhawan, Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, PIN Code-226010 

Details of the appellant-Mohalla Surekapuram colony, Jabalpur Road, Sangmohal post office, Districts Mirzapur, Pin code 231001, State-Uttar Pradesh, Mobile number 7379105911 

Details of the respondents- 

1-PIO of Public Authority approached-Shakti Mohan Awasthi Designation-Ad. Deputy Commissioner of Police.Mobile No 8595902511 Email Id, District-Gautam Buddha Nagar, Pin Code-203202 

2-Concerned Appellate Authority- Harishchandra, Mobile No 8595902505, Email Id District-Gautam Buddha Nagar, Pin Code-203202 

Prayer- Public information officer denied information by taking recourse of subsection 1 (h)Section 8 of the right to information act 2005 while the sought information does not concern the investigation. 

Short submissions of the appellant are as follows. 

1- It is submitted before the Honourable Sir that the matter concerns the corruption which must be investigated in transparent and accountable way in time bound manner. Section 173 in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 173. Report of police officer on completion of investigation. (1) Every investigation under this Chapter shall be completed without unnecessary delay. As soon as it is completed, the officer in charge of the police station shall forward to a Magistrate empowered to take cognizance of the offence on a police report. 

2-It is submitted before the Honourable Sir that subsection 1 (h)Section 8 of the right to information act 2005 categorically states that information which would impede the process of investigation or apprehension, or prosecution of offenders is exempted from disclosure under right to information act 2005. 

3-This is a humble request of the appellant to the most respected member of the Information Commission that he must take the perusal of the first and second page of the attached pdf document to this appeal which is the denial of information by the concerned police officer. 

4-It is quite obvious that more than eight months have passed in the matter and the concerned investigation officer of the police is still withholding the information in the name of continuation of investigation in the matter which means if he provides the information it will impede the process of Investigation. 

5-Whether the concerned investigation officer could not submit chargesheet in the concerned competent court which was to be submitted by him as soon as it is completed according to subsection one half section 171 of the code of criminal procedure 1973. 

6-Right to information at 2005 was introduced by the government of India to promote transparency and accountability in the working.

Supporting document ((only pdf up to 1 MB)) Supporting document not provided

RTI Application Details u/s 6(1) :-

Registration Number PCGBN/R/2024/60042

Date of Filing 17/01/2024

PIO of Public Authority approached Shakti Mohan Awasthi

Designation Ad. Deputy Commissioner of Police

Phone No 8595902511

Email Id

PIO Order/Decision Number Details not provided

* PIO Order/Decision Date

Registration Number PCGBN/A/2024/60024

Name Yogi M P Singh

Date of Filing 16/02/2024

Status RTI APPEAL RECEIVED as on 16/02/2024

  Nodal Officer Details  


Telephone Number 8595902504



An anti-corruption crusader. Motive to build a strong society based on the principle of universal brotherhood. Human rights defender and RTI activist. Working for the betterment of societies and as an anti-corruption crusader for more than 25 years. Our sole motive is to raise the voices of weaker and downtrodden sections of the society and safeguard their human rights. Our motive is to promote the religion of universal brotherhood among the various castes communities of different religions. Man is great by his deeds and character.


Your view points inspire us

  1. Because of rampant corruption in the working of the public staff they do not like the right to information act 2005 because it promotes the transparency and accountability in the working of the government staff.
    Think about the good governance of yogi and Modi where orders of the constitutional functionaries are not followed by the bureaucrats. Think about the poor corruption perception index of the transparency international regarding India. Which is the root cause of this anarchy.

  2. The job of the police is to be instrumental in maintaining law and order in the state but the factual position is that police itself are most dangerous law breakers.

  3. Right to information act 2005 has been put into dustbin by the government staff to promote corruption in the government machinery which is quite obvious from the working of the various public authorities under the government.

Previous Post Next Post