PIO L.D.A. Deputy Secretary, Atul Krishna was again directed by FAA to provide information to Dinesh Pratap Singh within 15 days of order

L.D.A. is running away from providing information concerning compliance of High court order so Dinesh Pratap Singh again sought information

PARTIES SUMMONED FOR HEARING as on 16/02/2024 , 12:00 PM Additional Secretary Office, Lucknow Development Authority

 Registration Number LKDPA/A/2024/60008

Name Dinesh Pratap Singh

Date of Filing 28/01/2024

Status APPEAL DISPOSED OF as on 21/02/2024

Reply :- Order attached

View Document

  Nodal Officer Details  

Name Rekha Doharey

Telephone Number 7081100326

Email-ID ldartionline@gmail.com

Online RTI Appeal Form Details

Public Authority Details :-

* Public Authority LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORIT

Personal Details:-

* Name Dinesh Pratap Singh

Gender Male

* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road, Sangmohal post office

Districts Mirzapur

Pincode 231001

State Uttar Pradesh

Educational Status Literate

Phone Number Details not provided

Mobile Number +91-9838919619

Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com

Citizenship Indian

* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No

First Appeal Details u/s 19(1) :-

Registration Number LKDPA/A/2024/60008

Date of Filing 28/01/2024

Concerned Appellate Authority Anil Bhatnagar

Phone No

Email Id

* Ground For Appeal No Response Within the Time Limit

((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )

* Prayer or Relief Sought From the following status, it is quite obvious that the appellant submitted RTI application on 24th October 2023 which was forwarded put the concerned public information officer on 25th October 2023 which means more than 3 months passed but the concerned public information officer did not provide any information sought by the appellant from the public information officer of Lucknow development authority concerning irregularities and corruption in the working of the public authority. Registration Number LKDPA/R/2023/60437, Name Dinesh Pratap Singh, Date of Filing 24/10/2023 Status REQUEST FORWARDED TO PIO as on 25/10/2023, Details of PIO: - Telephone Number: - 9918001893, Email Id:- Note:- You are advised to contact the above-mentioned officer for further details. 

Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Angad Prasad Singh who is the claimant of the plot of the land quite obvious from the order passed by the Lucknow bench of the High court of judicature at Allahabad in the Writ Petition Number 135 HC Year 2006. In the Writ Petition Number 135 HC Year 2006 filed in the Lucknow bench of the High court of Judicature at Allahabad filed by Anuradha Singh also named Guddi also named Aradhana Singh through her mother Beena Singh wife of Brijraj Singh also Beena Singh wife of Netrpal Singh. 

Whether in the same matter, to get remedy from various redressal bodies and get public aid by changing the name is not illegal? In the aforementioned writ, Anuradha Singh was directed by the High court of judicature to seek civil remedy from competent authority by filing a title suit. 

Public Information Officer in the office of Lucknow Development Authority may provide the following information to the information seeker point wise as follows. 

1-L.D.A. may provide the details of title suit filed by multi-named lady Anuradha Singh in the record of L.D.A. Guddi Singh including the designation, name of the public staff who executed it with posting detail. 

2-L.D.A. may provide the copy of the order passed by the competent court deciding the title suit of the Anuradha Singh in the compliance of the High court order in the Writ Petition Number 135 HC Year 2006. which is attached to this application in PDF form. 

3-L.D.A. may provide the detail of the posting of the staff who executed the registry of plots as told by L.D.A. registry has been executed to allottees, with designation and name so that accountability may be fixed. 

4- High Court and Supreme Court are the court of records which means orders passed by such courts are binding on the government departments, parties of the litigation and subordinate courts. 

Right to reason is the indispensable part of the sound judicial system and it is not only applicable in judiciary, but it is an indispensable part of the sound administrative system. Please provide the reason for overlooking order and name and resignation of the staff of the Lucknow Development Authority who overlooked the order passed by the Lucknow bench of the high court

Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))

RTI Application Details u/s 6(1) :-

Registration Number LKDPA/R/2023/60437

Date of Filing 24/10/2023

PIO of Public Authority approached Atul Krishna

Designation Deputy Secretary

Phone No 9918001893

Email Id

PIO Order/Decision Number Details not provided

* PIO Order/Decision Date

Beerbhadra Singh

To write blogs and applications for the deprived sections who can not raise their voices to stop their human rights violations by corrupt bureaucrats and executives.

3 Comments

Your view points inspire us

  1. It is a mockery of the provisions of right to information act 2005 because public information officer is taking under teeth the direction issued by the first appellate authority in the matter. The most surprising fact is that first appellate authority is not taking any action which must be taken against indisciplined officer of the department for not complying the direction passed by the senior rank officer.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This is a cryptic approach of the first appellate authority of the Lucknow development authority to show his pseudo honesty through such cryptic dealings because he is well apprised of the fact that there is a corruption and public information officer is running away from providing information making failed effort to prove itself honest.

    ReplyDelete
  3. लखनऊ विकास प्राधिकरण खुद एक भ्रष्टाचार का गढ है योगी सरकार की स्व घोषित ईमानदारी मात्र छलावा है लखनऊ विकास प्राधिकरण का जन सूचना अधिकारी कोई भी सूचना नहीं देता है किंतु उसे पर प्रदेश सरकार का कोई कंट्रोल नहीं है उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य सूचना आयोग खुद एक भ्रष्टाचार का घर है इसका शोध अधिकारी मनमाने तरीके से द्वितीय अपीलों को रिजेक्ट कर देता है

    ReplyDelete
Previous Post Next Post