Showing posts with label Lucknow Development Authority. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lucknow Development Authority. Show all posts

LDA concealing its corruption by demanding documents from Dinesh Pratap Singh arbitrarily

 Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2024/0027798

Grievance Concerns To

Name Of Complainant

Mahesh Pratap Singh alias Yogi M. P. Singh

Date of Receipt

01/05/2024

Received By Ministry/Department

Uttar Pradesh

Grievance Description

The matter concerns working of L.D.A. Lucknow.

This application is on behalf of Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Angad Prasad Singh who is senior citizen. Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Angad Prasad Singh is a victim of corruption in Lucknow Development Authority.

1- First page of attached PDF document is the arbitrary and inconsistent parrot report dated 29 December 2023 of Atul Krishna Singh, deputy secretary of L.D.A. submitted in grievance of the applicant registered as Grievance Status for registration number: GOVUP/E/2023/0081676 Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant-Keshav Pratap Singh alias Tantrik K P Singh, Date of Receipt-09/12/2023, Received By Ministry/Department-Uttar Pradesh.

2- It is quite obvious from the second page of the attached PDF document it is the communication of the special executive officer of the Lucknow development authority mister Rajiv Kumar dated 6th February 2020 in which you have inform the applicant Dinesh Pratap Singh that you are taking action in the matter for that very purpose you have summoned requisite documents from the allottees. Which is still awaited on the part of allottees.

2- Numerous communications were exchange with the allottees by the Lucknow development authority but it is most unfortunate that committee members could not succeed to get documents as allottees failed to provide the requisite documents which are essential to prove the right of allottees on the allotted land because they had already sold all the five plots to the applicant.

3- Subsequently Lucknow development authority formed an enquiry committee into the matter consisting of three members and this committee is making enquiries to check the anomalies made during the execution of the registry of the impugned land.

4-It is quite obvious that setup committee of the Lucknow development authority is also seeking documents from the applicant and those documents were made available to the concerned staff who made the communication with the applicant but fortunately he has been transferred to the other desk by the competent authority so informed that he is not posted at the same place now he has been posted to the other desk which is the root cause documents sent by the applicant Dinesh Pratap Singh did not reach to the committee.

5- The next three pages of this PDF document attached to the grievance is the power of attorney provided by the Babu Singh to the applicant.

Subsequently, in the next four pages of the attached PDF document to the grievance, is the agreement made between Babu Singh and the applicant regarding the five plots which is under dispute? The next page is the receipt of the payment made by the applicant to the allottees through Babu Singh.

6- It is quite obvious that the next two pages in the attached PDF document is the electricity bill of the applicant when the applicant was living in the house sold by the Babu Singh in the impugned plot which was later grabbed by allottees under monitoring of Guddi/Aradhana/Anuradha W/O Babu Singh provided by the Babu Singh because of the arbitrariness of the Lucknow development authority who overlooked the order of the Lucknow bench of high court of judicature at Allahabad.

7- Next for pages of the attached PDF document is the affidavit of the Satyesh Prakash Dwivedi sub inspector of police station Ashiana, district-Lucknow submitted in the Lucknow bench of the high court of judicature at Allahabad.

8- It is quite obvious that the next two pages of the attached PDF document is the communication of the property officer of the Lucknow development authority to Ajay Singh and Guddi regarding the objection made by the applicant before registry of the impugned land.

9- It is quite obvious that next three pages are the order passed by the Lucknow bench of the high court of judicature at Allahabad which must be perused by the respected members of the committee which was violated by the staff of the Lucknow development authority who executed the registry of the land.

Grievance Document

Current Status

Grievance received   

Date of Action

01/05/2024

Officer Concerns To

Forwarded to

Uttar Pradesh

Officer Name

Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary)

Organisation name

Uttar Pradesh

Contact Address

Chief Minister Secretariat , Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow

Email Address

bhaskar.12214@gov.in

Contact Number

05222226350

Reminder(s) / Clarification(s)

Reminder Date

Remarks

01/05/2024

10- It is quite obvious that next three pages are the affidavits submitted by Babu Singh, Guddi Singh and Kanishk Kumar Singh before L.D.A. to get plots which contain false and misleading information.

This is a humble request of the applicant that committee members of the Lucknow development authority looking into irregularities in allocation of land and executing of registry may take the perusal of the attached document of the 24 pages before taking any decision in the matter.

It is quite obvious from the representation that this representation has been submitted to provide the requisite documents to the Lucknow Development Authority which is being sought by them from the aggrieved Dinesh Pratap Singh, but it is most unfortunate that they are not capable to understand the contents of the representation. Think about the anarchy prevailed in the working of the Lucknow Development Authority who are not providing information under right to information act 2005 in the name that committee has been formed in the matter and they are seeking documents from the party for more than two years. Whether it is proper way to curb the corruption from government machinery by the Yogi government who is claiming to provide corruption free governance to the people in the state as claimed by both Yogi and Modi time and again. Undoubtedly parliamentary elections are coming close and they will again claim to provide corruption free governance. Where is corruption free governance?

To see the attached document to the grievance, please click on the link

PIO Snigdha Chaturvedi of Lucknow Development Authority did not provide any information



 Welcome UPICR20240000149
UTTAR PRADESH INFORMATION COMMISSION
Second Appeal under section 19(3) of the Right to Information Act, 2005
Appeal Registration Number - A-20240401330
Appeallent's Particulars
Applied Date : 16/04/2024 02:50:43 AM
Name     Yogi M P Singh
Gender     Male
State     UTTAR PRADESH
District     MIRZAPUR
Town/Village     मिर्जापुर
Pincode     231001
Mobile Number     7379105911
Email     yogimpsingh@gmail.com
Address     सुरेकापुरम कॉलोनी जबलपुर रोड मिर्जापुर सिटी
Department
Department     HOUSING AND URBAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT (District)
Division     Lucknow
District     Lucknow
Office     Housing and Urban Planning Department,Lucknow Distrcit
Details of Request for obtaining information under section 6(1) of RTI Act, 2005
Date of RTI application under section 6(1)     26-12-2023
Is the Applicant below piverty line?     No
Section 6(1) Application No.     LKDPA/R/2023/60546
Section 6(1) Transaction ID     LKDPAR20230000000902
Action Taken by Public Information Officer(PIO)
Answer of P.I.O.     Not providing Information in Stipulated Time
Date of PIO Reply     ---
Public Information Officer Details
PIO     Snigdha Chaturvedi
Address     Public Information Officer Office - Housing and Urban Planning Department,Lucknow Distrcit
Pincode     226012
Mobile Number     9918001502
Email     ldartionline@gmail.com
Details of First Appeal
Date of First Appeal application under Section 19(1)     02-02-2024
FAA     Anil Bhatnagar
Address     First Appellate Authority Office - Housing and Urban Planning Department,Lucknow District
Pincode     226012
Mobile Number     7081100326
Email     ldartionline@gmail.com
FAA Address Details
Answer of First Appellate Authority (FAA)     Answer unsatisfactory/false/misleading etc.
Date of Order     05-04-2024
Remarks
Relief sought under Section 19(3)- Second Appeal of the Right to Information Act, 2005     Public information officer did not provide any information and not made any communication regarding to provide information even after order of FAA
Other Supporting Documents
Document-1 Details     APPLICATION STATUS
Document-2 Details     Supporting doc
Hearing Option
Hearing Type     Offline
Online Hearing Mobile     ---
Online Hearing Email     ---
Declaration
I hereby state that the information and particulars given above are true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I also declare that this matter is not previously filed with this commission nor is pending with any Court or tribunal or authority.
Documents Enclosure
Scanned copy of the signed second appeal u/s 19(3) of the Right to Information Act,2005     
Document-1     
Document-2     
Copy of Order     
Copy of RTI Application under section 6(1)     
Copy of First Appeal under section 19(1) 

To
        Chief Information Commissioner/ Companion Information Commissioners
                  7/7A, RTI Bhawan, Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, PIN Code-226010
Details of the appellant-Mohalla Surekapuram colony , Jabalpur Road, Sangmohal post office, Districts    Mirzapur, Pincode    231001,State    Uttar Pradesh, Mobile number 7379105911
Details of the respondents-
1-PIO of Public Authority approached    Snigdha Chaturvedi
Designation    Nayab Tehsildar, Lucknow development authority
Phone No    9918001502, Email Id not provided.         
PIN Code-    226012
2-Concerned Appellate Authority    Anil Bhatnagar
Phone No           Email Id Lucknow development authority
PIN Code-    226012    
Prayer- Public information officer did not entertain RTI application within time 30 days as prescribed under subsection 1 of section 7 of the right to information act 2005 and still he has not provided any information. No correspondence has been made by public information officer regarding to prove information yet.
Short submissions of the appellant are as follows.
From the following order of the first appellate authority it is quite obvious that public information officer had not provided any information to the appellant and he did not provide any information in compliance with the order passed by the first appellate authority as follows.
कार्यालय : लखनऊ विकास प्राधिकरण, लखनऊ
प्रथम अपील संख्या-LKDPA/A/2024/60025
(श्री योगी एम०पी०सिंह बनाम जनसूचना अधिकारी, ल०वि०प्रा०) सुनवाई तिथि-20.03.2024
ऑनलाइन मूल आवेदन दिनांक-26.12.2023
पत्रांकः LKDPA/A/2024/60025
दिनांक-20.03.2024
-: आदेश :-
अपीलार्थी श्री योगी एम०पी० सिंह पता-मोहल्ला-सुरेकापुरम, जबलपुर रोड, संगमोहाल पोस्ट आफिस द्वारा सूचना का अधिकार अधिनियम-2005 की धारा-6 (1) के अन्तर्गत सूचना चाही गई है। प्राप्त ऑनलाइन आवेदन पत्र सम्बन्धित जनसूचना अधिकारी को अन अन्तरित किया जा चुका है। नियमानुसार निर्धारित अवधि में सूचना न प्राप्त होने / सूचना से असंतुष्ट होने पर आवेदक द्वारा दिनांक 02.02.2024 को ऑनलाइन प्रथम अपील आवेदन किया गया, जिसके क्रम में ऑनलाइन प्राप्त प्रथम अपील की सुनवाई दिनांक 20.03.2024 को नियत करते हुए अपीलकर्ता को सुनवाई हेतु सूचना प्रेषित की गई। सुनवाई की नियत तिथि पर अपीलकर्ता उपस्थित नहीं हुए। सम्बन्धित जनसूचना अधिकारी / उनके प्रतिनिधि उपस्थित हुए। सुनवाई के समय पत्रावली के परिशीलन से विदित हुआ कि अपीलार्थी को सूचना प्रेषित किये जाने का कोई अभिलेखीय साक्ष्य पत्रावली में उपलब्ध नहीं है।
अतः आदेशित किया जाता है कि प्रभारी अधिकारी अधिष्ठान / ज०सू०अ०, ल०वि०प्रा० इस आदेश के पारित होने के 15 दिवस के अन्दर आवेदक के ऑनलाइन आवेदन के सापेक्ष नियमानुसार प्रदाय किये जाने योग्य सूचनाएं अपीलार्थी को उपलब्ध कराएं।
तद्नुसार प्रश्नगत ऑनलाइन प्रथम अपील निस्तारित की जाती है।
प्रतिलिपि-
अपर सचिव / प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी लखनऊ विकास प्राधिकरण
1. प्रभारी अधिकारी-अधिष्ठान / ज०सू०अ०, ल०वि० प्रा० को अनुपालनार्थ।
2. श्री योगी एम०पी०सिंह पता-मोहल्ला-सुरेकापुरम, जबलपुर रोड, संगमोहाल पोस्ट आफिस
अपर सचिव / प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी लखनऊ विकास प्राधिकरण
This is a humble request of your applicant to you Hon'ble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness, and chaos arbitrarily by making the mockery of law of land? There is need of the hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer to win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your appellant shall ever pray for you, Hon’ble Sir.
Date-16/04/2024                                                Yours sincerely

                                     Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911,
Mohalla- Surekapuram colony, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar
 Pradesh, PIN code-231001.  

To see the attached document to the RTI application, please click on the link 

PIO in Lucknow Development Authority is repeatedly violating provisions of RTI act 2005

L.D.A. did not provide any information on RTI application forwarded by commissioner after appeal so information sought again 

Your RTI Appeal filed successfully.

Please note down the details of registration.

Registration Number :LKDPA/A/2024/60057

Name :Yogi M P Singh

Date of Filing :10-03-2024

Request filed with :LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

 Contact Details  

Telephone Number :7081100326

Email-ID :ldartionline@gmail.com

Online RTI Appeal Form Details

Public Authority Details :- 

* Public Authority LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY  

Personal Details:-

* Name Yogi M P Singh

Gender Male

* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road, Sangmohal post office

Districts Mirzapur

Pincode 231001

State Uttar Pradesh

Educational Status Literate

Phone Number Details not provided

Mobile Number +91-7379105911

Email-ID yogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com

Citizenship Indian

* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No

First Appeal Details u/s 19(1) :-

Registration Number LKDPA/A/2024/60057

Date of Filing 10/03/2024

Concerned Appellate Authority Nodal Officer

Phone No Details not provided

Email Id Details not provided

* Ground For Appeal No Response Within the Time Limit

((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )

* Prayer or Relief Sought From the following status, it is quite obvious that the appellant submitted the RTI application on 19 January 2024 which was forwarded to the concerned public information officer on 20th January 2024 but it is most unfortunate concerned public information officer of Lucknow Development Authority did not provide any information to the appellant which is violation of subsection 1 of section 7 of a right to information actor 2005.

Registration Number LKDPA/R/2024/60058, Name Yogi M P Singh, Date of Filing 19/01/2024

Status REQUEST FORWARDED TO PIO as on 20/01/2024

Details of PIO :- Telephone Number:- 9918001893, Email Id:-

Note :- You are advised to contact the above mentioned officer for further details.

This RTI application was made on behalf of Dinesh Pratap Singh son of Angad Prasad Singh to seek information concerning deep-rooted irregularities in the working Lucknow Development Authority.

Most respected sir, at present, the Lucknow Development Authority, whether it may be an application on the Jansunwai portal or a complaint or any request, is ignoring everyone on the ground that a committee has been constituted in the matter, but neither will they tell anything about the committee nor will they try to solve the case in question, they have been dilly-dallying in the matter for three years. Whether the Yogi government stops corruption in this way.

You denied the information in the name of setting up a committee to look into the corrupt activities carried out by the concerned staff of the Lucknow Development Authority. You are again requested to provide the following information so that the corrupt staff of the Lucknow Development Authority may be exposed in the public domain and how L.D.A. is shielding its corrupt staff ipso facto? 

Whether the information concerning the working of the public staff belonging to the Lucknow Development Authority can be withheld in the name of setting up of a committee as being done by the public authority in the current matter.

It is quite obvious that when the first appeal is made in such matters then order is passed by the first appellate authority to provide information to the appellant within a specific time but it is most unfortunate concerned public information officer does not comply the order passed by the first appellate authority which is not only mockery of the provisions of right to information act but also tantamount to indiscipline being done by the public information officer.

Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB)) Supporting document not provided

RTI Application Details u/s 6(1) :-

Registration Number LKDPA/R/2024/60058

Date of Filing 19/01/2024

PIO of Public Authority approached Atul Krishna

Designation Deputy Secretary

Phone No 9918001893

Email Id

PIO Order/Decision Number Details not provided

* PIO Order/Decision Date

Registration Number LKDPA/A/2024/60057

Name Yogi M P Singh

Date of Filing 10/03/2024

Status RTI APPEAL RECEIVED as on 10/03/2024

  Nodal Officer Details  

Name Rekha Doharey

Telephone Number 7081100326

Email-ID ldartionline@gmail.com

PIO L.D.A. Deputy Secretary, Atul Krishna was again directed by FAA to provide information to Dinesh Pratap Singh within 15 days of order

L.D.A. is running away from providing information concerning compliance of High court order so Dinesh Pratap Singh again sought information

PARTIES SUMMONED FOR HEARING as on 16/02/2024 , 12:00 PM Additional Secretary Office, Lucknow Development Authority

 Registration Number LKDPA/A/2024/60008

Name Dinesh Pratap Singh

Date of Filing 28/01/2024

Status APPEAL DISPOSED OF as on 21/02/2024

Reply :- Order attached

View Document

  Nodal Officer Details  

Name Rekha Doharey

Telephone Number 7081100326

Email-ID ldartionline@gmail.com

Online RTI Appeal Form Details

Public Authority Details :-

* Public Authority LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORIT

Personal Details:-

* Name Dinesh Pratap Singh

Gender Male

* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road, Sangmohal post office

Districts Mirzapur

Pincode 231001

State Uttar Pradesh

Educational Status Literate

Phone Number Details not provided

Mobile Number +91-9838919619

Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com

Citizenship Indian

* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No

First Appeal Details u/s 19(1) :-

Registration Number LKDPA/A/2024/60008

Date of Filing 28/01/2024

Concerned Appellate Authority Anil Bhatnagar

Phone No

Email Id

* Ground For Appeal No Response Within the Time Limit

((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )

* Prayer or Relief Sought From the following status, it is quite obvious that the appellant submitted RTI application on 24th October 2023 which was forwarded put the concerned public information officer on 25th October 2023 which means more than 3 months passed but the concerned public information officer did not provide any information sought by the appellant from the public information officer of Lucknow development authority concerning irregularities and corruption in the working of the public authority. Registration Number LKDPA/R/2023/60437, Name Dinesh Pratap Singh, Date of Filing 24/10/2023 Status REQUEST FORWARDED TO PIO as on 25/10/2023, Details of PIO: - Telephone Number: - 9918001893, Email Id:- Note:- You are advised to contact the above-mentioned officer for further details. 

Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Angad Prasad Singh who is the claimant of the plot of the land quite obvious from the order passed by the Lucknow bench of the High court of judicature at Allahabad in the Writ Petition Number 135 HC Year 2006. In the Writ Petition Number 135 HC Year 2006 filed in the Lucknow bench of the High court of Judicature at Allahabad filed by Anuradha Singh also named Guddi also named Aradhana Singh through her mother Beena Singh wife of Brijraj Singh also Beena Singh wife of Netrpal Singh. 

Whether in the same matter, to get remedy from various redressal bodies and get public aid by changing the name is not illegal? In the aforementioned writ, Anuradha Singh was directed by the High court of judicature to seek civil remedy from competent authority by filing a title suit. 

Public Information Officer in the office of Lucknow Development Authority may provide the following information to the information seeker point wise as follows. 

1-L.D.A. may provide the details of title suit filed by multi-named lady Anuradha Singh in the record of L.D.A. Guddi Singh including the designation, name of the public staff who executed it with posting detail. 

2-L.D.A. may provide the copy of the order passed by the competent court deciding the title suit of the Anuradha Singh in the compliance of the High court order in the Writ Petition Number 135 HC Year 2006. which is attached to this application in PDF form. 

3-L.D.A. may provide the detail of the posting of the staff who executed the registry of plots as told by L.D.A. registry has been executed to allottees, with designation and name so that accountability may be fixed. 

4- High Court and Supreme Court are the court of records which means orders passed by such courts are binding on the government departments, parties of the litigation and subordinate courts. 

Right to reason is the indispensable part of the sound judicial system and it is not only applicable in judiciary, but it is an indispensable part of the sound administrative system. Please provide the reason for overlooking order and name and resignation of the staff of the Lucknow Development Authority who overlooked the order passed by the Lucknow bench of the high court

Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))

RTI Application Details u/s 6(1) :-

Registration Number LKDPA/R/2023/60437

Date of Filing 24/10/2023

PIO of Public Authority approached Atul Krishna

Designation Deputy Secretary

Phone No 9918001893

Email Id

PIO Order/Decision Number Details not provided

* PIO Order/Decision Date

Details of order dated 14/12/2021 has been sent to L.D.A. by UPHRC which description is given in sought information so they may search


Registration Number LKDPA/A/2024/60005

Name Dinesh Pratap Singh

Date of Filing 22/01/2024

Status APPEAL DISPOSED OF as on 21/02/2024.

Reply :- 2 order attached

View Document

  Nodal Officer Details  

Name Rekha Doharey

Telephone Number 7081100326

Email-ID ldartionline@gmail.com

Online RTI Appeal Form Details

Public Authority Details :- 

* Public Authority LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 

Personal Details:-

* Name Dinesh Pratap Singh

Gender Male

* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road, Sangmohal post office

Districts Mirzapur

Pincode 231001

State Uttar Pradesh

Educational Status Literate

Phone Number Details not provided

Mobile Number +91-9838919619

Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com

Citizenship Indian

* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No

First Appeal Details u/s 19(1) :-

Registration Number LKDPA/A/2024/60005

Date of Filing 22/01/2024

Concerned Appellate Authority Anil Bhatnagar

Phone No

Email Id

* Ground For Appeal No Response Within the Time Limit

((Description of Information sought (up to 500 characters)

* Prayer or Relief Sought From the following status it is quite obvious that RTI application received in the office on 17th October 2023 which was transferred to the other public authority on 18th October 2023 i.e. public information officer Telephone Number:- 9918001893,  for providing information to the information seeker but it is most unfortunate concerned public information officer did not entertain RTI application of the appellant which is a mockery of the provisions of the right to Information Act 2005 must be taken into account by the first appellate authority.  Registration Number LKDPA/R/2023/60417 Name Dinesh Pratap Singh Date of Filing 17/10/2023 Status REQUEST FORWARDED TO PIO as on 18/10/2023 Details of PIO :- Telephone Number:- 9918001893, Email Id:- Note :- You are advised to contact the above mentioned officer for further details. 

U.P.H.R.C. passed order on 14/12/2021 but its compliance was not made by L.D.A. therefore information sought from L.D.A. to fix accountability Diary No 1865/IN/2021 Case / File No 2356/24/48/2021 Victim Name DINESH PRATAP SINGH Registration Date 22/07/2021 Action: Disposed with Directions (Action No 1) Action Date 14/12/2021 Authority THE VICE CHAIRMAN, LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, LUCKNOW  

Proceeding 

याचिका की प्रतिलिपि उपाध्यक्ष, लखनऊ विकास प्राधिकरण, लखनऊ को इस निर्देश के साथ भेज दी जाये कि वह प्रार्थी श्री योगी एम0पी0 सिंह दिये गये शिकायती प्रार्थना पत्र के सन्दर्भ में जारी किये गये आदेशों के परिपेक्ष्य मे अपने स्तर से आवश्यक कार्यवाही सुनिश्चित करायें। 

For more details, vide attached document to this RTI Communique. Public information officer, Lucknow development authority may provide the following information in reference to the aforementioned order passed by Honourable Human Rights Commission, Government of Uttar Pradesh point wise as sought. 

1-PIO may provide date and time when public authority L.D.A. received the aforementioned order dated 14/12/2021 passed by the Honourable Human Rights Commission, Government of Uttar Pradesh. 

2--PIO may provide the notings made by the competent authorities in order to comply with the passed order dated 14/12/2021 passed by the Honourable Human Rights Commission, Government of Uttar Pradesh. 

3-PIO may provide the report if any submitted by the Lucknow Development Authority before the Honourable Human Rights Commission, Government of Uttar Pradesh in compliance of the aforementioned direction dated 14/12/2021 and time and date if not why. 

4-The order passed by the Lucknow bench of the high court of judicature at Allahabad directing the petitioner Anuradha Singh to seek the order of the competent court regarding the title suit. Public Information Officer in Lucknow Development Authority may provide the copy of the competent court which decided the title suit in favour of Anuradha Singh on basis of which registry of the impugned land was done by the Lucknow Development Authority in favour of Anuradha Singh/Aradhana Singh/Guddi and others.

Supporting document ((only pdf up to 1 MB))

RTI Application Details u/s 6(1) :-

Registration Number LKDPA/R/2023/60417

Date of Filing 17/10/2023

PIO of Public Authority approached Atul Krishna

Designation Deputy Secretary

Phone No 9918001893

Email Id

PIO Order/Decision Number Details not provided

* PIO Order/Decision Date


Lucknow Development Authority has crossed every limit of corruption which is quite obvious from repeated arbitrary reply

 

Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2024/0006965

Grievance Concerns To

Name Of Complainant

Yogi M. P. Singh

Date of Receipt

30/01/2024

Received By Ministry/Department

Uttar Pradesh

Grievance Description

This application is on behalf of Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Angad Prasad Singh who is senior citizen. Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Angad Prasad Singh is a victim of corruption in Lucknow Development Authority.

1-First page of the attached PDF document is the arbitrary and inconsistent parrot report dated 29 December 2023 of Atul Krishna Singh, deputy secretary of L.D.A. submitted in the grievance of the applicant registered as Grievance Status for registration number: GOVUP/E/2023/0081676 Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant-Keshav Pratap Singh alias Tantrik K P Singh, Date of Receipt-09/12/2023, Received By Ministry/Department-Uttar Pradesh.

2-It is quite obvious from the second page of the attached PDF document it is the communication of the special executive officer of the Lucknow development authority mister Rajiv Kumar dated 6th February 2020 in which you have inform the applicant Dinesh Pratap Singh that you are taking action in the matter for that very purpose you have summoned requisite documents from the allottees. Which is still awaited on the part of allottees.

2-Numerous communications were exchange with the allottees by the Lucknow development authority but it is most unfortunate that committee members could not succeed to get documents as allottees failed to provide the requisite documents which are essential to prove the right of allottees on the allotted land because they had already sold all the five plots to the applicant.

3-Subsequently Lucknow development authority formed an enquiry committee into the matter consisting of three members and this committee is making enquiries to check the anomalies made during the execution of the registry of the impugned land.

4-It is quite obvious that setup committee of the Lucknow development authority is also seeking documents from the applicant and those documents were made available to the concerned staff who made the communication with the applicant but fortunately he has been transferred to the other desk by the competent authority so informed that he is not posted at the same place now he has been posted to the other desk which is the root cause documents sent by the applicant Dinesh Pratap Singh did not reach to the committee.

5-The next three pages of this PDF document attached to the grievance is the power of attorney provided by the Babu Singh to the applicant.

Subsequently, in the next four pages of the attached PDF document to the grievance, is the agreement made between Babu Singh and the applicant regarding the five plots which is under dispute? The next page is the receipt of the payment made by the applicant to the allottees through Babu Singh.

6-It is quite obvious that the next two pages in the attached PDF document is the electricity bill of the applicant when the applicant was living in the house sold by the Babu Singh in the impugned plot which was later grabbed by allottees under monitoring of Guddi/Aradhana/Anuradha W/O Babu Singh provided by the Babu Singh because of the arbitrariness of the Lucknow development authority who overlooked the order of the Lucknow bench of high court of judicature at Allahabad.

7- Next for pages of the attached PDF document is the affidavit of the Satyesh Prakash Dwivedi sub inspector of police station Ashiana, district-Lucknow submitted in the Lucknow bench of the high court of judicature at Allahabad.

8- It is quite obvious that the next two pages of the attached PDF document is the communication of the property officer of the Lucknow development authority to Ajay Singh and Guddi regarding the objection made by the applicant before registry of the impugned land.

9- It is quite obvious that next three pages are the order passed by the Lucknow bench of the high court of judicature at Allahabad which must be perused by the respected members of the committee which was violated by the staff of the Lucknow development authority who executed the registry of the land.

Grievance Document

Current Status

Case closed   

Date of Action

17/02/2024

Remarks

Please see the attachment

Reply Document

Rating

1

Poor

Rating Remarks

It is quite obvious from the representation that this representation has been submitted to provide the requisite documents to the Lucknow Development Authority which is being sought by them from the aggrieved Dinesh Pratap Singh, but it is most unfortunate that they are not capable to understand the contents of the representation. Think about the anarchy prevailed in the working of the Lucknow Development Authority who are not providing information under right to information act 2005 in the name that committee has been formed in the matter and they are seeking documents from the party for more than two years. Whether it is proper way to curb the corruption from government machinery by the Yogi government who is claiming to provide corruption free governance to the people in the state as claimed by both Yogi and Modi time and again. Undoubtedly parliamentary elections are coming close and they will again claim to provide corruption free governance. Where is corruption free governance?

Appeal Details

Appeal Number

Date of Receipt

Appeal Text

Current Status

Officer Concerns To

Officer Name

Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary)

Organisation name

Government of Uttar Pradesh

Contact Address

Chief Minister Secretariat , Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow

Email Address

bhaskar.12214@gov.in

Contact Number

05222226350

Reminder(s) / Clarification(s)

Reminder Date

Remarks

30/01/2024

10-It is quite obvious that next three pages are the affidavits submitted by Babu Singh, Guddi Singh and Kanishk Kumar Singh before L.D.A. to get plots which contain false and misleading information.

This is a humble request of the applicant that committee members of the Lucknow development authority looking into irregularities in allocation of land and executing of registry may take the perusal of the attached document of the 24 pages before taking any decision in the matter.

Grievance Status for registration number: GOVUP/E/2023/0087151, Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant-Keshav Pratap Singh alias Tantrik K P Singh, Date of Receipt-31/12/2023, Received By Ministry/Department-Uttar Pradesh

Rating Remarks-Officer Name Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary) Organisation name Government of Uttar Pradesh Contact Address Chief Minister Secretariat, Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow Current Status-Case closed, Date of Action-16/01/2024 Remarks-Please see the attachment Mr. Bhaskar Pandey can you tell the applicant where is the attachment? Think about the credibility of the chief minister office of government which did not attach the document and just saying in the comment please see the attachment which is a mockery of the law of land and action must be taken against the corrupt staff but who will bell the cat when most are corrupt in the government? Our chief minister Yogi Adityanath only makes comments regarding the bad working style of the public staff but he is failed to take action against the dereliction of the public staff which is the root cause of this anarchy. Where is the good governance in this largest democracy in the world? Good governance is only a dream.

To see the attached document to the grievance, please click on the link

Uttar Pradesh government is running away from corruption of Lucknow development authority alleged by Dinesh Pratap Singh



 

Grievance Status for registration number: GOVUP/E/2024/0006965

Grievance Concerns To

Name Of Complainant

Yogi M. P. Singh

Date of Receipt

30/01/2024

Received By Ministry/Department

Uttar Pradesh

Grievance Description

This application is on behalf of Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Angad Prasad Singh who is senior citizen. Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Angad Prasad Singh is a victim of corruption in Lucknow Development Authority.

1-First page of the attached PDF document is the arbitrary and inconsistent parrot report dated 29 December 2023 of Atul Krishna Singh, deputy secretary of L.D.A. submitted in the grievance of the applicant registered as Grievance Status for registration number: GOVUP/E/2023/0081676 Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant-Keshav Pratap Singh alias Tantrik K P Singh, Date of Receipt-09/12/2023, Received By Ministry/Department-Uttar Pradesh.

2-It is quite obvious from the second page of the attached PDF document it is the communication of the special executive officer of the Lucknow development authority mister Rajiv Kumar dated 6th February 2020 in which you have inform the applicant Dinesh Pratap Singh that you are taking action in the matter for that very purpose you have summoned requisite documents from the allottees. Which is still awaited on the part of allottees.

2-Numerous communications were exchange with the allottees by the Lucknow development authority but it is most unfortunate that committee members could not succeed to get documents as allottees failed to provide the requisite documents which are essential to prove the right of allottees on the allotted land because they had already sold all the five plots to the applicant.

3-Subsequently Lucknow development authority formed an enquiry committee into the matter consisting of three members and this committee is making enquiries to check the anomalies made during the execution of the registry of the impugned land.

4-It is quite obvious that setup committee of the Lucknow development authority is also seeking documents from the applicant and those documents were made available to the concerned staff who made the communication with the applicant but fortunately he has been transferred to the other desk by the competent authority so informed that he is not posted at the same place now he has been posted to the other desk which is the root cause documents sent by the applicant Dinesh Pratap Singh did not reach to the committee.

5-The next three pages of this PDF document attached to the grievance is the power of attorney provided by the Babu Singh to the applicant.

Subsequently, in the next four pages of the attached PDF document to the grievance, is the agreement made between Babu Singh and the applicant regarding the five plots which is under dispute? The next page is the receipt of the payment made by the applicant to the allottees through Babu Singh.

6-It is quite obvious that the next two pages in the attached PDF document is the electricity bill of the applicant when the applicant was living in the house sold by the Babu Singh in the impugned plot which was later grabbed by allottees under monitoring of Guddi/Aradhana/Anuradha W/O Babu Singh provided by the Babu Singh because of the arbitrariness of the Lucknow development authority who overlooked the order of the Lucknow bench of high court of judicature at Allahabad.

7- Next for pages of the attached PDF document is the affidavit of the Satyesh Prakash Dwivedi sub inspector of police station Ashiana, district-Lucknow submitted in the Lucknow bench of the high court of judicature at Allahabad.

8- It is quite obvious that the next two pages of the attached PDF document is the communication of the property officer of the Lucknow development authority to Ajay Singh and Guddi regarding the objection made by the applicant before registry of the impugned land.

9- It is quite obvious that next three pages are the order passed by the Lucknow bench of the high court of judicature at Allahabad which must be perused by the respected members of the committee which was violated by the staff of the Lucknow development authority who executed the registry of the land.

Grievance Document

Current Status

Grievance received   

Date of Action

30/01/2024

Officer Concerns To

Forwarded to

Uttar Pradesh

Officer Name

Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary)

Organisation name

Uttar Pradesh

Contact Address

Chief Minister Secretariat , Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow

Email Address

bhaskar.12214@gov.in

Contact Number

05222226350

Reminder(s) / Clarification(s)

Reminder Date

Remarks

30/01/2024

10-It is quite obvious that next three pages are the affidavits submitted by Babu Singh, Guddi Singh and Kanishk Kumar Singh before L.D.A. to get plots which contain false and misleading information.

This is a humble request of the applicant that committee members of the Lucknow development authority looking into irregularities in allocation of land and executing of registry may take the perusal of the attached document of the 24 pages before taking any decision in the matter.

Grievance Status for registration number: GOVUP/E/2023/0087151, Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant-Keshav Pratap Singh alias Tantrik K P Singh, Date of Receipt-31/12/2023, Received By Ministry/Department-Uttar Pradesh

Rating Remarks-Officer Name Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary) Organisation name Government of Uttar Pradesh Contact Address Chief Minister Secretariat, Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow Current Status-Case closed, Date of Action-16/01/2024 Remarks-Please see the attachment Mr. Bhaskar Pandey can you tell the applicant where is the attachment? Think about the credibility of the chief minister office of government which did not attach the document and just saying in the comment please see the attachment which is a mockery of the law of land and action must be taken against the corrupt staff but who will bell the cat when most are corrupt in the government? Our chief minister Yogi Adityanath only make comments regarding the bad working style of the public staff but he is failed to take action against the dereliction of the public staff which is the root cause of this anarchy. Where is the good governance in this largest democracy in the world? Good governance is only a dream.

To see the attached document to the grievance, please click on the link

Public information officer Lucknow Development Authority has been habitual to take under teeth provisions of RTI act 2005

 

Registration Number LKDPA/R/2024/60073

Name Yogi M P Singh

Date of Filing 28/01/2024

Status RTI REQUEST RECEIVED as on 28/01/2024

  Nodal Officer Details  

Name Rekha Doharey

Telephone Number 7081100326

Email-ID ldartionline@gmail.com

Online RTI Request Form Details

Public Authority Details :- 

* Public Authority LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY   

Personal Details of RTI Applicant:-

Registration Number LKDPA/R/2024/60073

Date of Filing 28/01/2024

* Name Yogi M P Singh

Gender Male

* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road, Sangmohal post office

Districts Mirzapur

Pincode 231001

State Uttar Pradesh

Educational Status Literate

Phone Number Details not provided

Mobile Number +91-7379105911

Email-ID yogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com

Citizenship Indian

* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No

RTI Application Details u/s 6(1) :-

((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )

* Description of Information Sought Registration Number LKDPA/R/2023/60437, Name Dinesh Pratap Singh, Date of Filing 24/10/2023 Status REQUEST FORWARDED TO PIO as on 25/10/2023, Details of PIO :- Telephone Number: - 9918001893, 

Registration Number :LKDPA/A/2024/60008, Name :Dinesh Pratap Singh, Date of Filing :28-01-2024 

An application on behalf of Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Angad Prasad Singh who is the claimant of the plot of the land quite obvious from the order passed by the Lucknow bench of the High court of judicature at Allahabad in the Writ Petition Number 135 HC Year 2006. In the Writ Petition Number 135 HC Year 2006 filed in the Lucknow bench of the High court of Judicature at Allahabad filed by Anuradha Singh also named Guddi also named Aradhana Singh through her mother Beena Singh wife of Brijraj Singh also Beena Singh wife of Netrpal Singh. Whether in the same matter, to get remedy from various redressal bodies and get public aid by changing the name is not illegal?

In the aforementioned writ, Anuradha Singh was directed by the High court of judicature to seek civil remedy from competent authority by filing a title suit.

Public Information Officer in the office of Lucknow Development Authority may provide the following information to the information seeker point wise as follows.

1-L.D.A. may provide the details of title suit filed by multi-named lady Anuradha Singh in the record of L.D.A. Guddi Singh including the designation, name of the public staff who executed it with posting detail.

2-L.D.A. may provide the copy of the order passed by the competent court deciding the title suit of the Anuradha Singh in the compliance of the High court order in the Writ Petition Number 135 HC Year 2006. which is attached to this application in PDF form.

3-L.D.A. may provide the detail of the posting of the staff who executed the registry of plots as told by L.D.A. registry has been executed  to allottees, with designation and name so that accountability may be fixed.

4- High Court and Supreme Court are the court of records which means orders passed by such courts are binding on the government departments, parties of the litigation and subordinate courts. Right to reason is the indispensable part of the sound judicial system and it is not only applicable in judiciary but it is an indispensable part of the sound administrative system. Please provide the reason for overlooking order and name and resignation of the staff of the Lucknow Development Authority who overlooked the order passed by the Lucknow bench of the high court of judicature at Allahabad as High court order in the Writ Petition Number 135 HC Year 2006. which is attached to this application in PDF form.

Most respected Public Information Officer of the Lucknow Development Authority should provide the information to the information seeker within stipulated 30 days as prescribed under subsection 1 of section 7 of The Right to Information Act 2005 in respect of above 4-point information. 

* Concerned PIO Nodal Officer

Designation Details not provided.

Phone No Details not provided.

Email Id Details not provided.

Supporting document ((only pdf up to 1 MB))

To see the attached document to the RTI application, please click on the link

Public information officer, Lucknow development authority did not provide any information regarding non-compliance of high court order

Your RTI Appeal filed successfully.

Please note down the details of registration.

Registration Number :LKDPA/A/2024/60008

Name :Dinesh Pratap Singh

Date of Filing :28-01-2024

Request filed with :LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

 Contact Details  

Telephone Number :7081100326

Email-ID :ldartionline@gmail.com 

Online RTI Appeal Form Details

Public Authority Details :-  

* Public Authority LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY  

Personal Details:-

* Name Dinesh Pratap Singh

Gender Male

* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road, Sangmohal post office

Districts Mirzapur

Pincode 231001

State Uttar Pradesh

Educational Status Literate

Phone Number Details not provided

Mobile Number +91-9838919619

Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com

Citizenship Indian

* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No

First Appeal Details u/s 19(1) :-

Registration Number LKDPA/A/2024/60008

Date of Filing 28/01/2024

Concerned Appellate Authority Nodal Officer

Phone No Details not provided

Email Id Details not provided

* Ground For Appeal No Response Within the Time Limit

((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )

* Prayer or Relief Sought From the following status, it is quite obvious that the appellant submitted RTI application on 24th October 2023 which was forwarded put the concerned public information officer on 25th October 2023 which means more than 3 months passed but the concerned public information officer did not provide any information sought by the appellant from the public information officer of Lucknow development authority concerning irregularities and corruption in the working of the public authority. Registration Number LKDPA/R/2023/60437, Name Dinesh Pratap Singh, Date of Filing 24/10/2023 Status REQUEST FORWARDED TO PIO as on 25/10/2023, Details of PIO :- Telephone Number:- 9918001893, Email Id:- Note :- You are advised to contact the above mentioned officer for further details. Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Angad Prasad Singh who is the claimant of the plot of the land quite obvious from the order passed by the Lucknow bench of the High court of judicature at Allahabad in the Writ Petition Number 135 HC Year 2006. In the Writ Petition Number 135 HC Year 2006 filed in the Lucknow bench of the High court of Judicature at Allahabad filed by Anuradha Singh also named Guddi also named Aradhana Singh through her mother Beena Singh wife of Brijraj Singh also Beena Singh wife of Netrpal Singh. Whether in the same matter, to get remedy from various redressal bodies and get public aid by changing the name is not illegal? In the aforementioned writ, Anuradha Singh was directed by the High court of judicature to seek civil remedy from competent authority by filing a title suit. Public Information Officer in the office of Lucknow Development Authority may provide the following information to the information seeker point wise as follows. 1-L.D.A. may provide the details of title suit filed by multi-named lady Anuradha Singh in the record of L.D.A. Guddi Singh including the designation, name of the public staff who executed it with posting detail. 2-L.D.A. may provide the copy of the order passed by the competent court deciding the title suit of the Anuradha Singh in the compliance of the High court order in the Writ Petition Number 135 HC Year 2006. which is attached to this application in PDF form. 3-L.D.A. may provide the detail of the posting of the staff who executed the registry of plots as told by L.D.A. registry has been executed to allottees, with designation and name so that accountability may be fixed. 4- High Court and Supreme Court are the court of records which means orders passed by such courts are binding on the government departments, parties of the litigation and subordinate courts. Right to reason is the indispensable part of the sound judicial system and it is not only applicable in judiciary but it is an indispensable part of the sound administrative system. Please provide the reason for overlooking order and name and resignation of the staff of the Lucknow Development Authority who overlooked the order passed by the Lucknow bench of the high court

Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))

RTI Application Details u/s 6(1) :-

Registration Number LKDPA/R/2023/60437

Date of Filing 24/10/2023

PIO of Public Authority approached Atul Krishna

Designation Deputy Secretary

Phone No 9918001893

Email Id

PIO Order/Decision Number Details not provided

* PIO Order/Decision Date

Registration Number LKDPA/A/2024/60008
Name Dinesh Pratap Singh
Date of Filing 28/01/2024
Status RTI APPEAL RECEIVED as on 28/01/2024
  Nodal Officer Details  
Name Rekha Doharey
Telephone Number 7081100326
Email-ID ldartionline@gmail.com

Registration Number LKDPA/R/2023/60437

Name Dinesh Pratap Singh

Date of Filing 24/10/2023

Status REQUEST FORWARDED TO PIO as on 25/10/2023

Details of PIO :- Telephone Number:- 9918001893, Email Id:-

Note :- You are advised to contact the above mentioned officer for further details.

  Nodal Officer Details  

Name Rekha Doharey

Telephone Number 7081100326

Email-ID ldartionline@gmail.com

Online RTI Request Form Details

Public Authority Details :-

* Public Authority LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY  

Personal Details of RTI Applicant:-

Registration Number LKDPA/R/2023/60437

Date of Filing 24/10/2023

* Name Dinesh Pratap Singh

Gender Male

* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road, Sangmohal post office

Districts Mirzapur

Pincode 231001

State Uttar Pradesh

Educational Status Literate

  Above Graduate

Phone Number Details not provided

Mobile Number +91-9838919619

Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com

Citizenship Indian

* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No

RTI Application Details u/s 6(1) :-

((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )

* Description of Information Sought Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Angad Prasad Singh who is the claimant of the plot of the land quite obvious from the order passed by the Lucknow bench of the High court of judicature at Allahabad in the Writ Petition Number 135 HC Year 2006. In the Writ Petition Number 135 HC Year 2006 filed in the Lucknow bench of the High court of Judicature at Allahabad filed by Anuradha Singh also named Guddi also named Aradhana Singh through her mother Beena Singh wife of Brijraj Singh also Beena Singh wife of Netrpal Singh. Whether in the same matter, to get remedy from various redressal bodies and get public aid by changing the name is not illegal? In the aforementioned writ, Anuradha Singh was directed by the High court of judicature to seek civil remedy from competent authority by filing a title suit. 

Public Information Officer in the office of Lucknow Development Authority may provide the following information to the information seeker point wise as follows.

 1-L.D.A. may provide the details of title suit filed by multi-named lady Anuradha Singh in the record of L.D.A. Guddi Singh including the designation, name of the public staff who executed it with posting detail. 

2-L.D.A. may provide the copy of the order passed by the competent court deciding the title suit of the Anuradha Singh in the compliance of the High court order in the Writ Petition Number 135 HC Year 2006. which is attached to this application in PDF form. 

3-L.D.A. may provide the detail of the posting of the staff who executed the registry of plots as told by L.D.A. registry has been executed to allottees, with designation and name so that accountability may be fixed. 

4- High Court and Supreme Court are the court of records which means orders passed by such courts are binding on the government departments, parties of the litigation and subordinate courts. Right to reason is the indispensable part of the sound judicial system and it is not only applicable in judiciary but it is an indispensable part of the sound administrative system. Please provide the reason for overlooking order and name and resignation of the staff of the Lucknow Development Authority who overlooked the order passed by the Lucknow bench of the high court of judicature at Allahabad as High court order in the Writ Petition Number 135 HC Year 2006. which is attached to this application in PDF form. 

Most respected Public Information Officer of the Lucknow Development Authority should provide the information to the information seeker within stipulated 30 days as prescribed under subsection 1 of section 7 of The Right to Information Act 2005 in respect of above 4-point information.

* Concerned PIO Atul Krishna

Designation Deputy Secretary

Phone No 9918001893

Email Id

Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB)

To see the attached document

to the RTI application, please

click on the link