Sadhana Tiwari requested police to register F.I.R. against offenders usurped her ancestral land when she was 10 years old


 

Grievance Status for registration number: GOVUP/E/2024/0011799

Grievance Concerns To

Name Of Complainant

Sadhana Tiwari

Date of Receipt

17/02/2024

Received By Ministry/Department

Uttar Pradesh

Grievance Description

The matter concerns the working of the superintendent of police district-Mirzapur to register F.I.R. against offenders who usurped the ancestral land of the applicant by reaping benefit of vulnerability of the applicant.

The details of offenders are as follows.

1-Dayashankar Mishra S/O Shambhu Saran Mishra, Police station-Drummond Ganj, village- Bhaisod Balay Pahad post-Drummond Ganj, tehsil-Lalganj, development block-Halia, District- Mirzapur Uttar Pradesh.

2- Hariprasad Mishra S/O Shambhu Saran Mishra, Police station-Drummond Ganj, village- Bhaisod Balay Pahad post-Drummond Ganj, tehsil-Lalganj, development block-Halia, District- Mirzapur Uttar Pradesh.

3-Lekhpal, Lalganj tehsil, 4-Revenue inspector, Lalganj tehsil and 5-Tehsildar, Lalganj tehsil

The matter concerns usurping of the ancestral land by reaping the vulnerability and immaturity of the applicant does not concern with land dispute, but it is criminal offence must be entertained by police to be instrumental in providing justice to applicant. Here ancestral usurped by the brothers of my deceased father by colluding with the Lekhpal, revenue inspector and tahsildar of tehsil Lalganj, district Mirzapur. Please provide justice to the applicant belonging to vulnerable section and setup excellent precedent so that such may not instigate others to destroy the life an adolescent girl whose parents died at tender age.

Class-I heirs-vi. Daughter of predeceased son. The applicant was class-1 heir in the property of my grandfather who died in 2005 but the property was not inherited in favour of the applicant and the applicant was merely 10 years old at that time. They have cheated my entire property dishonestly by colluding with the staff of Tehsil by reaping the vulnerability of the applicant. The report of the concerned investigation officer is arbitrary and not providing justice to the deprived section. Whether the matter of cheating is entertained by the civil court as being suggested by the concerned investigation officer of the police? All the concerned public staff who supported the offenders committed offence under criminal procedure code and Indian Penal Code must be subjected to the penal proceedings by the police to be instrumental in providing justice to a member of the vulnerable section. Here offenders cheated the property of the applicant by reaping the benefits of vulnerability of the applicant which must be taken into account by the police concerned. Where is the justice for the women and girls in the society?

Grievance Status for registration number: GOVUP/E/2023/0087071, Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant-Sadhana Tiwari, Date of Receipt-31/12/2023, Received By Ministry/Department-Uttar Pradesh

Right to reason is an indispensable part of the sound administrative system, so public information officer must provide the reason for not taking action against offenders under sections 466 467 468 420 195 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. There is no title dispute between the applicant and opposite party, but a criminal conspiracy to deprive the applicant from the property of her father and police is escaping from the matter by taking recourse that the matter is civil which is illogical.

In 2022, the Supreme Court ruled that daughters have the right to inherit their parents’ self-acquired property and any other property of which they are absolute owners, adding that this rule would apply even in cases where the parents of a daughter died intestate before the codification of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

Section 4(2) amendment

The Section 4(2) of the Hindu Succession Act did not include agricultural lands under its scope of inheritance. This was revoked in 2005 by adding the right to claim inheritance over agricultural lands. The Act was amended to ensure greater equality between men and women, so that women could exercise their rights on the lands they have been toiling.

Grievance Document

Current Status

Grievance received.   

Date of Action

17/02/2024

Officer Concerns To

Forwarded to

Uttar Pradesh

Officer Name

Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary)

Organisation name

Uttar Pradesh

Contact Address

Chief Minister Secretariat, Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow

Email Address

bhaskar.12214@gov.in

Contact Number

05222226350

To see the attached document to the grievance, please click on the link

Beerbhadra Singh

To write blogs and applications for the deprived sections who can not raise their voices to stop their human rights violations by corrupt bureaucrats and executives.

3 Comments

Whatever comments you make, it is your responsibility to use facts. You may not make unwanted imputations against any body which may be baseless otherwise commentator itself will be responsible for the derogatory remarks made against any body proved to be false at any appropriate forum.

  1. Here this question rises that why are police running away from registering the first information report in the matter of fraud committed by close relatives of the victim which is quite obvious from the matter. Where is the justice for the vulnerable section specially women and girls in the state of Uttar Pradesh.

    ReplyDelete
  2. If the police are not interested in a case, then it will say that it is not a criminal case but a civil case so it must be submitted before an appropriate magistrate or an appropriate court, but if the case increases the back door income of the police personnel, then they will say that this is not civil case but a criminal case.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It is quite obvious that the police is running away from registering the first information report in the matter of usurping the Ancestral property of the Sadhna Tiwari by the brothers of her own father. This criminal matter is being overlooked by the police by saying it civil dispute.

    ReplyDelete
Previous Post Next Post