Second appeal submitted in matter of Sunita against EE EDD II because earlier appeal arbitrarily rejected by research officer

 

Welcome UPICR20240000149

UTTAR PRADESH INFORMATION COMMISSION

Second Appeal under section 19(3) of the Right to Information Act, 2005

Appeal Registration Number - A-20240200174

Appellant's Particulars

Name Yogi M P Singh

Gender Male

State UTTAR PRADESH

District MIRZAPUR

Town/Village मिर्जापुर

Pincode 231001

Mobile Number 7379105911

Email yogimpsingh@gmail.com

Address सुरेकापुरम कॉलोनी जबलपुर रोड मिर्जापुर सिटी

Department

Department TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT (District)

Division Mirzapur

District Mirzapur

Office Energy Department, Mirzapur District

Details of Request for obtaining information under section 6(1) of RTI Act, 2005

Date of RTI application under section 6(1) 05-12-2023

Is the Applicant below piverty line? No

Section 6(1) Application No. PUVNL/R/2023/60408

Section 6(1) Transaction ID PUVNLR20230000000683

Action Taken by Public Information Officer(PIO)

Answer of P.I.O. There is no answer

Date of PIO Reply ---

Public Information Officer Details

PIO NA

Address Public Information Officer Office - Energy Department,Mirzapur Distrcit

Pincode 231001

Mobile Number NA

Email NA

Details of First Appeal

Date of First Appeal application under Section 19(1) 15-01-2024

FAA NA

Address First Appellate Authority Office - Energy Department,Mirzapur Distrcit

Pincode 231001

Mobile Number NA

Email NA

FAA Address Details

Answer of First Appellate Authority (FAA) There is no answer

Date of Order ---

Remarks

Relief sought under Section 19(3)- Second Appeal of the Right to Information Act, 2005 Public information officer did not entertain RTI application within time 30 days and still they not provided information.

Other Supporting Documents

Document-1 Details Supporting document

Document-2 Details application status

Hearing Option

Hearing Type Online

Online Hearing Mobile 7379105911

Online Hearing Email yogimpsingh@gmail.com

To 

        Chief Information Commissioner/ Companion Information Commissioners

                  7/7A, RTI Bhawan, Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, PIN Code-226010

Details of the appellant-Mohalla Surekapuram colony, Jabalpur Road, Sangmohal post office, Districts Mirzapur, Pincode 231001, State-Uttar Pradesh, Mobile number 7379105911

Details of the respondents-

1-PIO of Public Authority approached RAJESH KUMAR ( EDD-2 FATAH MRZ), Designation-EE & PIO EDD-2 FATAH MIRZAPUR, Mobile No-9450963597, Email Id- eddiimirzapur@gmail.com, District Mirzapur, PIN Code-231001

2-Concerned Appellate Authority- RAM BHUJARAT( EDC FATAH MRZ) Mobile Number: - 9415304000, Email Id:- seedcmirzapur1@gmail.com,  District Mirzapur, Pin code 231001

Prayer- Public information officer did not entertain RTI application within time 30 days as prescribed under subsection 1 of section 7 of the right to information act 2005 and still they have not provided any information.

Short submissions of the appellant are as follows.

1- The matter concerns Executive engineer electricity distribution division 2nd Mr Rajesh Kumar District Mirzapur. The public information officer has been habitual not to provide any information to the information seekers ipso facto.

2- From the status of the RTI application, it is quite obvious that the appellant submitted RTI application on 5th December 2023 which was forwarded on the same date to the executive engineer electricity distribution division 2nd Mr Rajesh Kumar, but he did not entertain the RTI application still. Which is a mockery of the provisions of the right to Information Act 2005.

3-It is quite obvious that public information officer did not entertain RTI application after two months which is violation of the subsection 1 of section 7 of the right to information at 2005. It is a mistake of the law which is not excusable under the law of land.

4- Mrs. Prabhavati Devi wife of Mr. Ram Avtar Has two sons and two daughters-in-law whose description is as follows.

1-Sunita, wife of Mr. Mangala Prasad and 2-Preeti W/O Ashok Prasad

In the same premises you have provided the electricity connection to the Preeti W/O Ashok Prasad who is the sister-in-law of the aggrieved applicant Sunita, wife of Mr. Mangala Prasad. Why is the following reason not applicable to Preeti W/O Ashok Prasad? Right to reason is the indispensable part of a sound administrative system so this reason must be provided to the applicant as required under the law. Under subsection 1 d of the section 4 of the right to information act 2005 it has been categorically stated that it shall be obligatory duty of each public authority to provide the reasons of its decision to the parties concerned. Do not conceal corruption. 

5- It is submitted before the Honourable Sir the matter concerns the deep-rooted corruption in the working of the executive engineer electricity distribution division 2nd Mr Rajesh Kumar which is the Root-Cause, he is running away from providing information to the appellant.

6- There are two types of evidence of corruption. 1- Direct corruption means corruption having direct evidence, 2- Indirect corruption which are proved by Circumstantial evidence. In this matter circumstantial evidence prove the corruption in the working of the public authority resulting in withholding information by the public information officer.

7- The appellant sought following information from the public information officer.

1- Public information officer must provide the reason of providing the electricity connection to Preeti W/O Ashok Prasad if in the same premise, connection number 6418848000 is already approved in the name of Mrs. Prabhavati Devi wife of Mr. Ram Avtar resident of Tehsil Road, Mahuwaria, Mirzapur in 01 KW L.G.V. 2 mode. On which electricity bill of Rs. 125794.00 is outstanding. 

2- Public information officer must provide the amount of bribe taken by the Department of electricity district-Mirzapur in providing illegal connection to Preeti W/O Ashok Prasad. I know that this amount is shared by all personnel who sign on the paper before passing an electricity connection.

3- Public information officer must provide the name and designation of the public staff who approved the electricity connection of Preeti W/O Ashok Prasad. 

4- If this illegal work of providing connection to Preeti W/O Ashok Prasad was done due to poverty of the poor applicant and the charity to poor by the government of Yogi Adityanath, then why is the same ground was not followed in the case of Sunita wife of Mr. Mangala Prasad? Please provide the reason for it. 

5- There is rampant corruption in the working of the public authority electricity distribution division second district Mirzapur, public information officer must provide the measures taken by the executive engineer electricity distribution division 2nd to curb it. Please also provide the details of the personnel who inspected the impugned site before providing electricity connection. 

This is a humble request of your applicant to you Hon'ble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness, and chaos arbitrarily by making the mockery of law of land? There is need of the hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer to win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your appellant shall ever pray for you, Hon’ble Sir.

Date-07/02/2024                                                Yours sincerely.

                                     Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911,

Mohalla- Surekapuram colony, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar

 Pradesh, PIN code-231001.

To see the attached second appeal with the online appeal made to UPSIC, please click on the link

Yogi

An anti-corruption crusader. Motive to build a strong society based on the principle of universal brotherhood. Human rights defender and RTI activist. Working for the betterment of societies and as an anti-corruption crusader for more than 25 years. Our sole motive is to raise the voices of weaker and downtrodden sections of the society and safeguard their human rights. Our motive is to promote the religion of universal brotherhood among the various castes communities of different religions. Man is great by his deeds and character.

Post a Comment

Whatever comments you make, it is your responsibility to use facts. You may not make unwanted imputations against any body which may be baseless otherwise commentator itself will be responsible for the derogatory remarks made against any body proved to be false at any appropriate forum.

Previous Post Next Post