Gautam Budh Nagar police denied information concerning action taken on syndicate misusing PAN Card of 635000 people so appeal made



Sought The matter concerns Gautam Budh Nagar police have busted a gang of eight people who were unscrupulously misusing permanent account number (PAN) cards of 635,000 people for over five years and created 2,660 shell companies to evade Goods and Services Tax (GST) worth multiple crores, deputy commissioner of police (Noida) Harish Chander said on Thursday as reported Jun 02, 2023 04:48 AM IST by Hindustan Times. The suspects have been identified as Yasin Sheikh, 38, of Mumbai, Akash Saini, 21, of Sahibabad, Atul Sengar, 23, of Hathras, Avni, 25, of Noida, Deepak Murjani, 48, his wife Vinita, 45, Vishal, 20, and Rajeev, 38, (all Delhi). They were apprehended at their office in Madhu Vihar, Delhi. (Sunil Ghosh/HT Photo) 

 Your RTI Appeal filed successfully.

Please note down the details of registration.

Registration Number :PCGBN/A/2023/60091

Name :Yogi M P Singh

Date of Filing :19-08-2023

Request filed with :POLICE COMMISSIONER OFFICE GAUTAM BUDDA NAGAR

 Contact Details  

Telephone Number :8595902504

Email-ID :adcp-polhq.gb@up.gov.in

Online RTI Appeal Form Details

Public Authority Details :-

   

* Public Authority POLICE COMMISSIONER OFFICE GAUTAM BUDDA NAGAR

   

Personal Details:-

* Name Yogi M P Singh

Gender Male

* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road, Sangmohal post office

Pincode 231001

State Uttar Pradesh

Educational Status Literate

Phone Number Details not provided

Mobile Number +91-7379105911

Email-ID yogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com

Citizenship Indian

* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No

First Appeal Details u/s 19(1) :-

Registration Number PCGBN/A/2023/60091

Date of Filing 19/08/2023

Concerned Appellate Authority Nodal Officer

Phone No Details not provided

Email Id Details not provided

* Ground For Appeal Provided Incomplete,Misleading or False Information

((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )

* Prayer or Relief Sought Additional deputy Commissioner of Police took the recourse after following two provisions of the right to Information Act 2005 to deprive the appellant from the sought information concerning wide public interest. Under subsection 1(j) of Section 8 of right to Information Act 2005 following information is exempted from disclosure- information which relates to personal information the disclosure of which has no relationship to any public activity or interest, or which would cause unwarranted invasion of the privacy of the individual unless the Central Public Information Officer or the State Public Information Officer or the appellate authority, as the case may be, is satisfied that the larger public interest justifies the disclosure of such information: Provided that the information which cannot be denied to the Parliament or a State Legislature shall not be denied to any person. Public information officer in the commissioner rate Gautam Budh Nagar Uttar Pradesh took the above provision of the right to Information Act to withhold the sought formation. Under subsection 1 (h)of Section 8 of right to Information Act 2005 following information is exempted from disclosure- information which would impede the process of investigation or apprehension or prosecution of offenders; 

The appellant sought the following information from the public information officer. 

1-Public information Officer may provide the current status of investigation in the aforementioned matter. 

2-Since the matter concerns deep-rooted corruption so the first information report is registered by the concerned police in the matter, the copy must be made available to the information seeker. 

3-Public information Officer may provide the name and designation of the investigation officer in the matter. 

4-If the concerned police team exchanges any communication with the central agencies like ministry of Home affairs and ministry of finance then provide the copy of the communication exchanged with the central agency. 

5-If the charge sheet has been sent to the competent court in the matter then provide the date and time and minutes of proceedings in this regard. 

It seems that public information officer did not read the following quote as follows. Provided that the information which cannot be denied to the Parliament or a State Legislature shall not be denied to any person. Here information sought under point 4 does not concern with the investigation of the police officer so this information must be made available to the appellant as well as when the investigation is over then the rest of the information should be made available by the public information officer

Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))

RTI Application Details u/s 6(1) :-

Registration Number PCGBN/R/2023/60612

Date of Filing 29/07/2023

PIO of Public Authority approached Shakti Mohan Awasthi

Designation Ad. Deputy Commissioner of Police

Phone No 8595902511

Email Id adcpnoidagbn@gmail.com

PIO Order/Decision Number Details not provided

* PIO Order/Decision Date

Registration Number PCGBN/A/2023/60091
Name Yogi M P Singh
Date of Filing 19/08/2023
Status RTI APPEAL RECEIVED as on 19/08/2023
  Nodal Officer Details  
Name VISHAL PANDAY
Telephone Number 8595902504
Email-ID adcp-polhq.gb@up.gov.in
Yogi

An anti-corruption crusader. Motive to build a strong society based on the principle of universal brotherhood. Human rights defender and RTI activist. Working for the betterment of societies and as an anti-corruption crusader for more than 25 years. Our sole motive is to raise the voices of weaker and downtrodden sections of the society and safeguard their human rights. Our motive is to promote the religion of universal brotherhood among the various castes communities of different religions. Man is great by his deeds and character.

Post a Comment

Whatever comments you make, it is your responsibility to use facts. You may not make unwanted imputations against any body which may be baseless otherwise commentator itself will be responsible for the derogatory remarks made against any body proved to be false at any appropriate forum.

Previous Post Next Post