Assistant Labour commissioner allowed a registered contractor to institute a case under payment of Wages Act, 1936 as a labourer illegally

Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2023/0055602

Grievance Concerns To

Name Of Complainant

Sudarshan Maurya

Date of Receipt


Received By Ministry/Department

Uttar Pradesh

Grievance Description

Quasi judicail proceedings initiated by the assistant labour commissioner District Mirzapur on the application of a contractor which is illegal and ultravires to the provisions of Payment of Wages Act, 1936. An enquiry may be ordered into the matter to curb such corrupt practices rampant in the office of assistant labour commissioner District Mirzapur.

An application under Article 51A of the constitution of India to make enquiry concerning the working of the assistant labour Commissioner district Mirzapur.

प्रार्थीगण/ अभियुक्तगण के विद्वान अधिवक्ता का यह तर्क है कि प्रार्थी याकूब अंसारी एक रजिस्टर्ड ठेकेदार है और जो भी काम किया गया वादी मुकदमा द्वारा नियुक्त सिविल इंजीनियर के कहने व मार्गदर्शन में किया है।

How can assistant labour Commissioner district Mirzapur can prosecute the applicant and his younger brother at the behest of Yakub Ansari considering Yakub Ansari as labourer? The applicant has submitted certain representations before the assistant labour Commissioner district Mirzapur that this case is the violation of the rules framed by the government of India as the case of the salary under the salary payment act is amenable before the assistant labour Commissioner only if the litigants are labourers.

The following is the observation made by the District judge District court Mirzapur. This observation was made by the District and session judge Mirzapur while delivering the judgement in the matter in which the applicant is a victim. This order contains four pages which are attached with this grievance as PDF documents.

बॉल एप्लीकेशन/2953/2023-फारुख अंसारी एवं अन्य वी.एस. उत्तर प्रदेश राज्य


न्यायालय District & Session Judge, Mirzapur

पीठासीन अधिकारी- (ANMOL PAL), (उच्चतर न्यायिक सेवा ) - UP01880

जमानत प्रार्थनापत्र संख्या - 1452 सन् 2023

1. फारूख अंसारी पुत्र याकूब अंसारी

2. याकूब अंसारी पुत्र सिद्दीकी मियां

समस्त निवासीगण हुसैन नगर मुस्लिम बस्ती रेलवे लाईन के पास चन्द्रदीपा थाना-को० कटरा, जिला मीरजापुर।


उ०प्र० राज्य

मु0अ0सं0-169 सन् 2022

धारा-406, 420, भा०दं०सहिता थाना को0 कटरा, जिला मीरजापुर।


यह प्रथम जमानत प्रार्थना-पत्र प्रार्थीगण/ अभियुक्तगण फारूख अंसारी व याकूब अंसारी की ओर से मु0अ0सं0 169 सन् 2022 अन्तर्गत धारा 406, 420 भा०दं०संहिता थाना को0 कटरा, जिला मीरजापुर में जमानत हेतु प्रस्तुत किया गया है ।

उक्त तहरीर के आधार पर फारूख अंसारी व याकूब अंसारी के विरूद्ध धारा-406, 420 भा०दं०सं० के अन्तर्गत मामला पंजीकृत किया गया है।

प्रार्थीगण/ अभियुक्तगण के विद्वान अधिवक्ता का यह तर्क है कि प्रार्थी याकूब अंसारी एक रजिस्टर्ड ठेकेदार है और जो भी काम किया गया वादी मुकदमा द्वारा नियुक्त सिविल इंजीनियर के कहने व मार्गदर्शन में किया है। प्रभारी नगर अभियन्ता नगर पालिका परिषद मीरजापुर द्वारा जो निरीक्षण किया गया है। उसमें किसी तकनीक का प्रयोग न करके मात्र आंख देखी बातों के आधार पर रिपोर्ट लगाया तथा वादी मुकदमा के दबाव व प्रभाव में आकर रिपोर्ट दिनांकित

एवं सत्र


In the court of Assistant Labour Commissioner District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh Payment of Wages Act, 1936 Case number-P.W./01/2022 Prayer-Notice issued through letter number- 78-80 dated 27-01-2022 against Sudarshan Maurya S/O Brijlal Maurya and Sandeep Maurya S/O Brijlal Maurya is ultra vires to Payment of Wages Act, 1936 therefore liable to be quashed because based on the concealed and false facts of the case. More details are attached to this representation. Object of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 The Payment of Wages Act regulates the payment of wages to certain classes of persons employed in industry. This implies that Payment of Wages Act, 1936 deals with the dispute between employer and employees but not between a contractor and a common man who had given contract to construct house to contractor Yakoob Ansari S/O Siddik Mia who is plaintiff number 1 in the aforementioned plaint. Yakoob Ali Ansari S/O Siddik Mia itself accepted in the complaint dated 07 June 2021 that he used to take contracts of the construction of houses. This implies that he is a contractor.

Grievance Document

Current Status

Grievance received   

Date of Action


Officer Concerns To

Forwarded to

Uttar Pradesh

Officer Name

Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary)

Organisation name

Uttar Pradesh

Contact Address

Chief Minister Secretariat , Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow

Email Address

Contact Number


To see the attached document to the grievance, click on the link

Beerbhadra Singh

To write blogs and applications for the deprived sections who can not raise their voices to stop their human rights violations by corrupt bureaucrats and executives.

Post a Comment

Whatever comments you make, it is your responsibility to use facts. You may not make unwanted imputations against any body which may be baseless otherwise commentator itself will be responsible for the derogatory remarks made against any body proved to be false at any appropriate forum.

Previous Post Next Post