Grievance Status for registration number : PMOPG/E/2023/0068944
Grievance Concerns To
Name Of Complainant
Yogi M. P. Singh
Date of Receipt
30/03/2023
Received By Ministry/Department
Prime Ministers Office
Grievance Description
An application on behalf of Saurabh Singh alias Rajan Singh son of Tej Bahadur Singh village Saraijeet Rai urf pure Bhava, police station Mauaima, district Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh.The matter concerns the working of the assistant police commissioner phoolpur district Prayagraj.The matter of fact is that opposite party mercilessly beat the applicant and when the applicant visited the police station, concerned police instead of registering the FIR against the offenders, concerned police put the applicant in lockup and when the application was submitted on behalf of the applicant against partial working of Mauaima police then police to wreak the vengeance registered a false FIR against the applicant and his father under the false charges of the Indian penal code showing blatant abuse power by the station officer of the Mauaima police station. The entire matter is in the cognizance of the circle officer Phoolpur but he is supporting the stand of the Mauaima police because of the department instead of an impartial approach. The applicant Saurabh Singh son of Tej Bahadur Singh made the queries in the court of assistant commissioner of police phoolpur Prayagraj on 29th of March 2023 quite obvious from the first page of the attached PDF documents. Please take a glance of the attachment to the grievance showing the lawlessness and anarchy of the MauAima police who are above the law.
The case was instituted by the Mauaima police under section 151, 107 and 116 of the criminal penal code in the day and in the same night at 9 PM nearabout they registered false case under various sections of India Penal Code on 1 March 2023 with false inclusion of the father Tej Bahadur Singh of the applicant.
Here it is quite obvious that the applicant is not talking about the foreclosure of the case registered against the applicant by the Mauaima police by adopting a partial approach in the matter. Here the applicant has only requested to the police that a first information report must be registered against the offenders who mercilessly beat the applicant. Instead of registering the first information report in the matter the applicant was put into lock up and his Bail was granted by the competent person on the next day. How can it be justified that police may register the false case against the victim in order to pressurize him? It is quite obvious that the concerned police are playing a dubious role in the matter. It is a humble request of the victim that a team of competent individuals should make enquiry in the matter to check the transparency and accountability in the working of the concerned police . Assistant commissioner of police phoolpur is also playing a cryptic role in the matter. The matter concerns land grabbing by the opposite party. The measurement of the Abadi land is more than one bigha. Its current price is more than 60 lakh rupees. Such a huge profit can create greed in the mind of any one.There are four stakeholders of this Abadi land in accordance with the law.
1-Rama Singh wife of late Chandrabali Singh.
2-Uma Singh wife of late Shiv Bahadur Singh
3- Suresh Singh Son of late Vijay Bahadur Singh
4-Tej Bahadur Singh Son of late Vijay Bahadur Singh
At present no one of the above stakeholders are living in the village therefore some neighbours are trying to grab the land by taking the local police under good faith. Is such a tendency in society justified? If someone is not using its piece of land then it may be grabbed by the neighbours, how can it be justified?
If the enquiry may be carried out by a senior rank officer, the nexus of police with the Land mafia may be exposed. If the police did not allow the following for the construction of the rooms, how can it allow land grabbers to grab the land and allow the change of status quo of the abadi land. Whether it is not human rights and constitutional rights violations of the aforementioned stakeholders? Where is law order in the state?
Grievance Document
Current Status
Case closed
Date of Action
27/04/2023
Remarks
अधीनस्थ अधिकारी के स्तर पर निस्तारित श्रीमान जी जांच आख्या सादर सेवा में प्रेषित हैं janch akhya sanlgn hai श्रीमानजी आख्या सादर सेवा मे प्रेषित है
Reply Document
Rating
1
Poor
Rating Remarks
Sir, the irrational report is being submitted by the concerned police and Assistant Commissioner of Police Phoolpur on the Public Grievance Portal and on the Public Hearing Portal of the Government of Uttar Pradesh. Sir, when the police arrested Saurabh Singh alias Rajan Singh and the opposition Balendra Bahadur Singh on suspicion of breach of peace from the spot, action was taken against them under sections 151, 107 and 116 of the Criminal Penal Code. So why was his FIR not registered under 6 sections at that time, which was deliberately registered by the police against Saurabh Singh alias Rajan Singh and his father at 9:00 pm on March 1, 2023, this entire report is a kind of story that the police have made? This story is far from the truth, the applicant is being harassed under a well-thought-out conspiracy, which is not appropriate in any way. Please take action against concerned police personnel who took law in their hands because of corruption.
Appeal Details
Appeal Number
Date of Receipt
Appeal Text
Current Status
Officer Concerns To
Officer Name
Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary)
Organisation name
Government of Uttar Pradesh
Contact Address
Chief Minister Secretariat , Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow
Email Address
bhaskar.12214@gov.in
Contact Number
05222226350
To see the attached document to the grievance, click on the link