Aggrieved Dinesh Pratap Singh is seeking action against wrongdoer police personnel of Lucknow police who overlooked High court order
संदर्भ संख्या : 40015723026989 , दिनांक - 17 Apr 2023 तक की स्थिति
आवेदनकर्ता का विवरण :
शिकायत संख्या:-40015723026989
आवेदक का नाम-Yogi M. P. Singh
विषय-It is quite obvious from the reports in the print and electronic media government of Uttar Pradesh claims to provide the good governance to the people in state but the factual position is that more than 90 public staff in the government machinery are corrupt and working of the Lucknow development authority is role model. There is no doubt that accountable public functionaries of the government are not interested to curb the corruption but it is the moral duty of a public staff to voluntarily act against the growing corruption which has taken entire government machinery under its influence. How can repeated parrot reply by the Lucknow development authority in the matter of deep rooted corruption in its working be justified? The government is providing huge emoluments of salary to the public staff despite this they are not satisfied with the salary being provided by the government and are indulging in the corruption to fill their pockets which can never be justified. I pray before the Honourable Sir order dated 07-03-2006 passed by Justice B.B. Agarwal of Lucknow bench of the High court of judicature at Allahabad It is simply ordered that the respondent number 4 to7 shall open the lock of the staircase so that Smt Anuradha Singh the petitioner may come out of the house and take the proper and appropriate remedy in the competent court and after that, she may have the liberty to go anywhere.
Respondnt1-Secretary Dept. of home
2-Police commissioner Lucknow
3-SHO police station -Ashiana,
Moreover, Honourable Justice in its order said that the raised matter is civil and amenable by filing a title suit before the court or authority. It is most surprising that the subordinate court is running away from taking perusal of order dated 07-03-2006 passed by Justice B.B. Agarwal of Lucknow bench of the High court of judicature at Allahabad and office monitoring body running away from transparency and accountability ipso facto.
Whether Lucknow development authority will disclose this fact that which court of law provided the civil remedy in the matter and decided the title suit between the Anuradha Singh and Dinesh Pratap Singh if not done so on what basis registry was carried out without taking the reference of the high court order which was mandatory for the Lucknow development authority to comply with the order passed by the highest court of law in the state of Uttar Pradesh. Lucknow Development Authority again overlooked the matter of deep-rooted corruption quite obvious from its report submitted on PG Portal.
Think about the deep-rooted corruption in the working of the Lucknow development authority which is procrastinating in providing information concerning the setup of enquiry committee which is making inquiry regarding irregularity in the allocation of the plots by the Lucknow development authority and the corruption made during the registry of the plots. It is well known fact that this matter is pending before the Lucknow development authority since 2017 and they are procrastinating on this matter of corruption by taking recourse of various cunning tricks. Instead of going into the facts of the case they have made a committee now to procrastinate on it.
Here matter of fact is that why the order passed by the Lucknow bench of the high court of judicature at Allahabad was not complied by the Lucknow development authority?
Why the registry executed by the Lucknow development authority without taking the perusal of the relevant records?
Department -विकास प्राधिकरणComplaint Category -
नियोजित तारीख-02-05-2023शिकायत की स्थिति-
Level -विकास प्राधिकरणPost -सचिव
प्राप्त रिमाइंडर-
प्राप्त फीडबैक -दिनांक को फीडबैक:-
फीडबैक की स्थिति -
संलग्नक देखें -Click here
नोट- अंतिम कॉलम में वर्णित सन्दर्भ की स्थिति कॉलम-5 में अंकित अधिकारी के स्तर पर हुयी कार्यवाही दर्शाता है!
अग्रसारित विवरण :
क्र.स. सन्दर्भ का प्रकार आदेश देने वाले अधिकारी अग्रसारित/आपत्ति दिनांक नियत दिनांक अधिकारी को प्रेषित आदेश स्थिति
1 अंतरित ऑनलाइन सन्दर्भ 17-04-2023 02-05-2023 सचिव-लखनऊ,विकास प्राधिकरण अनमार्क