PIO in the office of superintendent of police did not provide any information to Anil Kumar Maurya in the matter of land grabbing


SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE OFFICE MIRZAPUR did not provide information to Anil Kumar Maurya so later submitted appeal against PIO

Registration Number SPMZR/A/2023/60003

Name Anil Kumar Maurya

Date of Filing 15/03/2023

Status APPEAL DISPOSED OF as on 17/06/2023

Reply :- answer to anil kumar

View Document

  Nodal Officer Details  

Name AJAY KUMAR SINGH

Telephone Number 9454401105

Email-ID addlspopmzr@gmail.com

Online RTI Appeal Form Details

Public Authority Details :-

   

* Public Authority SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE OFFICE MIRZAPUR

   

Personal Details:-

* Name Anil Kumar Maurya

Gender Male

* Address Lohiya Talab , Kotwali Katra, Tehsil Sadar

Pincode 231001

State Uttar Pradesh

Educational Status Literate

Phone Number -9125142451

Mobile Number +91-9125142451

Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com

Citizenship Indian

* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No

First Appeal Details u/s 19(1) :-

Registration Number SPMZR/A/2023/60003

Date of Filing 15/03/2023

Concerned Appellate Authority

Phone No

Email Id

* Ground For Appeal No Response Within the Time Limit

((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )

* Prayer or Relief Sought Registration Number SPMZR/R/2023/60004 Name Anil Kumar Maurya Date of Filing 11/01/2023 Status RTI REQUEST RECEIVED as on 11/01/2023 Nodal Officer Details Name AJAY KUMAR SINGH Telephone Number 9454401105 Email-ID addlspopmzr@gmail.com It is quite obvious that the appellant submitted the application under subsection one of section 6 of The Right to information act 2005 on 11th January 2023 which is quite obvious from the aforementioned. Think about the gravity of situation that more than two months passed but concerned public information officer in the office of superintendent police did not provide the information to the information seeker which means appellant Anil Kumar Maurya in the matter concerning the grabbing of the land which is showing the lackadaisical approach of the police to the matters concerning the corruption and anarchy in the working of the police. Undoubtedly the public information officer in the office of superintendent of police violated the provisions of Right to information act 2005 which has been brought up by the government of India to promote the transparency and accountability in the working of the public authority but because of corruption in the department, it has been teeth less. Under subsection one of section 7 of Right to information at 2005 the time stipulated to provide information to the information seeker is 30 days and in this case 2 months have passed and public information officer in the office of superintendent of police did not entertain the application which is a mockery of the provisions of The Right to information act 2005 reflecting deep-rooted corruption in the working of the public authority. Where is the honesty in the governance as claimed by the accountable public functionaries in the government.

Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB)) Supporting document not provided

RTI Application Details u/s 6(1) :-

Registration Number SPMZR/R/2023/60004

Date of Filing 11/01/2023

PIO of Public Authority approached Nodal Officer

Designation Details not provided

Phone No Details not provided

Email Id Details not provided

PIO Order/Decision Number Details not provided

* PIO Order/Decision Date

Beerbhadra Singh

To write blogs and applications for the deprived sections who can not raise their voices to stop their human rights violations by corrupt bureaucrats and executives.

Post a Comment

Whatever comments you make, it is your responsibility to use facts. You may not make unwanted imputations against any body which may be baseless otherwise commentator itself will be responsible for the derogatory remarks made against any body proved to be false at any appropriate forum.

Previous Post Next Post