Uttar Pradesh Information Commission denied to provide information concerns the corruption in its registry to Yogi M P Singh

 



Your RTI Appeal filed successfully.

Please note down the details of registration.

Registration Number UPICM/A/2021/60033

Name Yogi M P Singh

Date of Filing 29-09-2021

Request filed with Uttar Pradesh Information Commission

 Contact Details  

Telephone Number 05222724941

Email-ID

Online RTI Appeal Form Details

Public Authority Details :-

   

* Public Authority Uttar Pradesh Information Commission

   

Personal Details of Appellant:-

Request Registration Number UPICM/R/2021/80008

Request Registration Date 26/08/2021

* Name Yogi M P Singh

Gender Male

* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Lakshmi Narayan Baikunth Mahadev Mandir, Jabalpur Road

Pincode 231001

Country India

State Uttar Pradesh

Status Details not provided

Educational Status Literate

Phone Number Details not provided

Mobile Number +91-7379105911

Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com

Appeal Details :-

Citizenship Indian

* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No

* Ground For Appeal Refused access to Information Requested

* PIO of Public Authority approached Tejaskar Pandey

PIO Order/Decision Number Details not provided

* PIO Order/Decision Date

((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )

* Prayer or Relief Sought Registration Number UPICM/R/2021/80008 Name Yogi M P Singh Date of Filing 26/08/2021 Status REQUEST DISPOSED OF as on 02/09/2021 Reply :- आप द्वारा प्रश्नगत आवेदक के माध्यम से आयोग की कार्यप्रणाली के सम्बन्ध में कतिपय आपत्ति व्यक्त की गयी है, जिसपर उच्चादेश हेतु आपका आवेदन निबन्धक, उ0प्र0 सूचना आयोग को अग्रसारित कर दिया गया है। 

Public information officer in the office of the chief minister, government of Uttar Pradesh may provide the following information as sought. 

1-According to chauki in charge, Mandi Samiti, the matter concerns the mismanagement and corruption of Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission, so it is expedient to carry out enquiry by the senior rank of officer of the commission. Provide the detail of officer nominated to carry out enquiry in regard to alleged irregularities being committed in the state information commission in the government of Uttar Pradesh. 

2-Provide the reason as required under subsection 1 d of the section 4 of the Right to Information Act 2005 to close the aforementioned grievance arbitrarily without reaching on any conclusion, even when the matter concerns the deep-rooted irregularities. 

3-Provide the name and designation of the staff under whose direction aforementioned grievance was closed arbitrarily, evidently jansunwai portal is monitored by the chief minister office of the government of Uttar Pradesh. 

4- Please provide detail if any enquiry to check irregularities in the Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission is under progress. Appellant is aggrieved with the corruption in the registry of the Uttar Pradesh Information Commission so submitted representation before the Government of Uttar Pradesh and information sought as aforementioned. 

On 14-Sept-2021, PIO, Mumataj Ahmad through its communication bearing letter number 4582 addressed to appellant denied the aforementioned four point information on the flimsy ground that grievance has been already disposed of, but the factual position is that subsequent grievance still not disposed of and PIO only made efforts to conceal the prevailed corruption in the registry of the UPSIC. The matter may be resolved by providing information sought under four points instead of shielding corrupt sheep. We want solution of corruption as depriving information seekers from information.

Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB)) Supporting document not provided

Registration Number UPICM/A/2021/60033

Name Yogi M P Singh

Date of Filing 29/09/2021

Status RTI APPEAL RECEIVED as on 29/09/2021

  Nodal Officer Details  

Telephone Number 05222724941

Email-ID

Registration Number UPICM/R/2021/80008

Name Yogi M P Singh

Date of Filing 26/08/2021

Status REQUEST DISPOSED OF as on 02/09/2021

Reply :- आप द्वारा प्रश्नगत आवेदक के माध्यम से आयोग की कार्यप्रणाली के सम्बन्ध में कतिपय आपत्ति व्यक्त की गयी है, जिसपर उच्चादेश हेतु आपका आवेदन निबन्धक, उ0प्र0 सूचना आयोग को अग्रसारित कर दिया गया है।

  Nodal Officer Details  

Telephone Number 05222724941

Email-ID

Online RTI Request Form Details

Public Authority Details :-

   

* Public Authority Uttar Pradesh Information Commission

   

Personal Details of RTI Applicant:-

Registration Number UPICM/R/2021/80008

Date of Filing 26/08/2021

* Name Yogi M P Singh

Gender Male

* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Lakshmi Narayan Baikunth Mahadev Mandir, Jabalpur Road

Pincode 231001

Country India

State Uttar Pradesh

Status Details not provided

Educational Status Literate

  Above Graduate

Phone Number Details not provided

Mobile Number +91-7379105911

Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com

Request Details :-

Citizenship Indian

* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No

((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )

* Description of Information Sought आवेदनकर्ता का विवरण : शिकायत संख्या:-60000210110527 आवेदक का नाम-Yogi M P Singh दिनांक12-08-2021 को फीडबैक:-महोदय जब प्रकरण राज्य सूचना आयोग उत्तर प्रदेश से है तो और खुद मंडी समित चौकी इंचार्ज बाली मौर्या ने भी अपने अपने रिपोर्ट में कहा है और उसी रिपोर्ट के आधार पर शिकायत को बंद कर दिए जब खुद हिंदी में लिखे है की आवेदक आवेदक द्वारा राज्य सूचना आयोग के कुप्रबंधन और भ्र्ष्टाचार की शिकायत प्रार्थी द्वारा किया गया है इसलिए प्रार्थना पत्र का निस्तारण राज्य सूचना आयोग के वरिष्ठ अधिकारी द्वारा कराया जाना समीचीन होगा और हास्यास्पद यह है की आप द्वारा द्वारा इस रिपोर्ट को आधार बना कर शिकायत निस्तारित लिया गया जो की भ्रष्टाचार को पोषित करने वाला है कृपया भूल का परिमार्जन करे For more detail, vide attached document to the R.T.I. rquest. 

Public information officer in the office of the chief minister, government of Uttar Pradesh may provide the following information as sought. 

1-According to chauki in charge, Mandi Samiti, the matter concerns the mismanagement and corruption of Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission, so it is expedient to carry out enquiry by the senior rank of officer of the commission. Provide the detail of officer nominated to carry out enquiry in regard to alleged irregularities being committed in the state information commission in the government of Uttar Pradesh. 

2-Provide the reason as required under subsection 1 d of the section 4 of the Right to Information Act 2005 to close the aforementioned grievance arbitrarily without reaching on any conclusion even when the matter concerns the deep-rooted irregularities. 

3-Provide the name and designation of the staff under whose direction aforementioned grievance was closed arbitrarily evidently jansunwai portal is monitored by the chief minister office of the government of Uttar Pradesh. 

4- Please provide detail if any enquiry to check irregularities in the Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission is under progress.

* Concerned PIO Tejaskar Pandey

Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))

संदर्भ संख्या : 60000210110527 , दिनांक - 29 Sep 2021 तक की स्थिति

आवेदनकर्ता का विवरण :

शिकायत संख्या:-60000210110527

आवेदक का नाम-Yogi M P Singhविषय-Instead of show of, we must take genuine steps to curb the steep hike in growing corruption. An institution invites the removal of objections from appellant through notice, but UPSIC returns the entire appeal through a parrot note. Whether it is not a mismanagement of a constitutional institution? 

Mismanagement and corruption in the working of Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission. 

Subject-Objection made by the commission in the appeal dated 23/07/2020 received in the office of Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission on 30/07/2020 through a communication dated 05/10/2020 received by the applicant on 31/10/2020 is arbitrary and illegal. 

The objections made by the Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission are as follows. 

1-Appellant has not attached a copy of R.T.I. Communique submitted under subsection 1 section 6 of Right Information Act 2005 to the second appeal dated 23/07/2020. 

2- Appellant has not attached a copy of R.T.I. first appeal submitted under subsection 1 section 19 of Right Information Act 2005 to the second appeal dated 23/07/2020. 

3- Appellant did not verify that no appeal submitted under subsection 3 of section 19 earlier in the same matter. 

Replies of the applicant before the accountable public functionaries including State Information Commission of Uttar Pradesh are as follows respectively. 

1-The submission 2 of the appeal dated 23/07/2020 contains the status and application of R.T.I. Communique registered on the portal of the Government of Uttar Pradesh as forwarded by the department of justice under subsection 3 of section 6 of R.T.I. Act of 2005. Vide attached document to the representation. 

\2- The submission 3 of the appeal dated 23/07/2020 contains the status and application of R.T.I. appeal submitted under subsection 1 of section 19 of the Right to Information Act 2005 registered on the portal of the Government of Uttar Pradesh. Vide attached document to the representation. 

3-Appellant can not verify that he submitted an appeal before the commission before appeal dated 23/07/2020 in the same matter as it is subject of commission. But appellant affirms that no appeal, he submitted before the Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission before the appeal dated 23/07/2020 in the same matter. Undoubtedly the Government has passed the august act, but the information is not accessible to citizens because of arbitrariness, tyranny and corruption in the government machinery. O God help me in my pious approach, betterment to society.

विभाग -शिकायत श्रेणी -

नियोजित तारीख-10-08-2021शिकायत की स्थिति-

स्तर -जनपद स्तरपद -जिलाधिकारी

प्राप्त रिमाइंडर-

प्राप्त फीडबैक -दिनांक12-08-2021 को फीडबैक:-महोदय जब प्रकरण राज्य सूचना आयोग उत्तर प्रदेश से है तो और खुद मंडी समित चौकी इंचार्ज बाली मौर्या ने भी अपने अपने रिपोर्ट में कहा है और उसी रिपोर्ट के आधार पर शिकायत को बंद कर दिए जब  खुद हिंदी  में लिखे  है की आवेदक आवेदक द्वारा राज्य सूचना आयोग के कुप्रबंधन और भ्र्ष्टाचार की शिकायत प्रार्थी द्वारा किया गया है इसलिए प्रार्थना पत्र का निस्तारण राज्य सूचना आयोग के वरिष्ठ अधिकारी द्वारा कराया जाना समीचीन होगा और हास्यास्पद यह  है की आप द्वारा द्वारा इस रिपोर्ट को आधार बना कर शिकायत  निस्तारित  लिया गया  जो की भ्रष्टाचार को पोषित करने वाला है कृपया भूल का परिमार्जन करे 

फीडबैक की स्थिति -पुलिस उप महानिरीक्षक/पुलिस महा निरीक्षक द्वारा संतोषजनक में परिवर्तित

संलग्नक देखें -Click here

नोट- अंतिम कॉलम में वर्णित सन्दर्भ की स्थिति कॉलम-5 में अंकित अधिकारी के स्तर पर हुयी कार्यवाही दर्शाता है!

अधीनस्थ द्वारा प्राप्त आख्या :

क्र.स. सन्दर्भ का प्रकार आदेश देने वाले अधिकारी आदेश/आपत्ति दिनांक आदेश/आपत्ति आख्या देने वाले अधिकारी आख्या दिनांक आख्या स्थिति संलगनक

1 अंतरित लोक शिकायत अनुभाग -3(, मुख्यमंत्री कार्यालय ) 26-07-2021 कृपया शीघ्र नियमानुसार कार्यवाही किये जाने की अपेक्षा की गई है। जिलाधिकारी-मिर्ज़ापुर, 10-08-2021 अधीनस्थ अधिकारी के स्तर पर निस्तारित निक्षेपित

2 अंतरित जिलाधिकारी ( ) 26-07-2021 नियमनुसार आवश्यक कार्यवाही करें वरिष्ठ /पुलिस अधीक्षक-मिर्ज़ापुर,पुलिस 10-08-2021 महोदय, जांच आख्या संलग्न कर सादर अवलोकनार्थ प्रेषित है। निस्तारित

3 आख्या वरिष्ठ /पुलिस अधीक्षक (पुलिस ) 26-07-2021 आवश्यक कार्यवाही करने का कष्ट करें एवं आख्या प्रेषित करें क्षेत्राधिकारी / सहायक पुलिस आयुक्त-क्षेत्राधिकारी , नगर ,जनपद-मिर्ज़ापुर 10-08-2021 महोदय , जांच आख्या सादर अवलोकनार्थ प्रेषित है । निस्तारित

4 आख्या क्षेत्राधिकारी / सहायक पुलिस आयुक्त (पुलिस ) 28-07-2021 पृष्ठांकित कृपया आख्या 05 दिवस मे प्रेेषित करना सुनिश्चित करे, प्रकऱण निस्तारण समय से न होने की दशा मे प्र0नि0 व सम्बन्धित जांच कर्ता का उत्तरदायित्व होगा । थानाध्‍यक्ष/प्रभारी नि‍रीक्षक-कोतवाली कटरा,जनपद-मिर्ज़ापुर,पुलिस 09-08-2021 आख्या संलग्न कर अवलोकनार्थ प्रेषित है। निस्तारित

Beerbhadra Singh

To write blogs and applications for the deprived sections who can not raise their voices to stop their human rights violations by corrupt bureaucrats and executives.

1 Comments

Whatever comments you make, it is your responsibility to use facts. You may not make unwanted imputations against any body which may be baseless otherwise commentator itself will be responsible for the derogatory remarks made against any body proved to be false at any appropriate forum.

  1. According to chauki in charge, Mandi Samiti, the matter concerns the mismanagement and corruption of Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission, so it is expedient to carry out enquiry by the senior rank of officer of the commission. Provide the detail of officer nominated to carry out enquiry in regard to alleged irregularities being committed in the state information commission in the government of Uttar Pradesh.

    ReplyDelete
Previous Post Next Post