Who is nominated enquiry officer by commissioner of police to comply order passed by member of UPHRC ? Yogi M P Singh



Submissions before the Uttar Pradesh Human Rights Commission


Please connect this supplementary to the case submitted before Uttar Pradesh Human Rights Commission  by the information seeker which detail is Diary No 1894/IN/2021 Case / File No 2383/24/48/2021-WC Registration Date 26/07/2021as the matter needs urgent and the utmost attention of the Honourable commission to growing anarchy in the office of police commissioner Lucknow. 
Prayer- प्रार्थी श्री योगी एम0पी0 सिंह द्वारा दिये गये शिकायती प्रार्थना पत्र में अंकित आरोपों की जांच राजपत्रित अधिकारी से करवा कर आवश्यक वैधानिक कार्यवाही सुनिश्चित करायें तथा कृत कार्यवाही की आख्या आयोग को दिनांक 03.09.2021 तक उपलब्ध करायें। Whether any letter communication was issued by the commissioner of police Lucknow in compliance of the order passed by the Honourable member of the Uttar Pradesh Human Rights Commission on 03/09/2021 as aforementioned to carry out enquiry regarding allegations made in the petition Diary No 1894/IN/2021 Case / File No 2383/24/48/2021-WC Registration Date 26/07/2021 by petitioner Yogi M. P. Singh. 
Factual position is that applicant sought information regarding the order passed by SHRC, Uttar Pradesh Case Details Diary No 1894/IN/2021 Case / File No 2383/24/48/2021-WC Action Date 12/08/2021 Authority THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, LUCKNOW Proceeding याचिका की प्रतिलिपि पुलिस आयुक्त, लखनऊ को इस निर्देश के साथ भेज दी जाये कि वह प्रार्थी श्री योगी एम0पी0 सिंह द्वारा दिये गये शिकायती प्रार्थना पत्र में अंकित आरोपों की जांच राजपत्रित अधिकारी से करवा कर आवश्यक वैधानिक कार्यवाही सुनिश्चित करायें तथा कृत कार्यवाही की आख्या आयोग को दिनांक 03.09.2021 तक उपलब्ध करायेंपत्रावली दिनांक 06.09.2021 को पुनः प्रस्तुत हो   

Public information officer in the office of commissioner of police Lucknow may provide the following information point wise as sought.

1-Provide the status  of the compliance regarding aforementioned order passed by the Honourable member of the Uttar Pradesh human rights commission. 

2-Provide the name and designation of gazetted officer appointed by the commissioner of police to comply to the order passed as aforementioned.

3-Provide the copy of the enquiry report submitted by the enquiry officer appointed by the police commissioner, Lucknow in compliance of the order of the commission. 

4-If commissioner of police Lucknow did not proceed in the matter still, then provide the cause of procrastination under subsection  1 d of section 4 of the Right to Information Act 2005. 
The information provided by them is surprising as no gazetted officer appointed by the commissioner of police to comply to the order passed as aforementioned.
Voluminous misleading information provided by the public information officer in the office of commissioner of police Lucknow, but it lacked detail of the gazetted officer in the compliance of order passed by the Honourable member of the commission. 

According to criminal penal code Chapter XII Section 173 deals with investigation of the police with section 161 and 164 as auxiliary provisions. 
Report of police officer on completion of investigation
Description 1-Every investigation under this Chapter shall be completed without unnecessary delay.
1A. The investigation in relation to an offence under sections 376, 376A, 376AB, 376B, 376C, 376D, 376DA, 376DB or 376E of the Indian Penal Code shall be completed within two months1 from the date on which the information was recorded by the officer in charge of the police station. 
Who is the gazetted officer nominated by the police commissioner Lucknow in compliance of the order passed by the Honourable member of the commission, and where is his findings? 
Beerbhadra Singh

To write blogs and applications for the deprived sections who can not raise their voices to stop their human rights violations by corrupt bureaucrats and executives.

1 Comments

Whatever comments you make, it is your responsibility to use facts. You may not make unwanted imputations against any body which may be baseless otherwise commentator itself will be responsible for the derogatory remarks made against any body proved to be false at any appropriate forum.

  1. Whether any letter communication was issued by the commissioner of police Lucknow in compliance of the order passed by the Honourable member of the Uttar Pradesh Human Rights Commission on 03/09/2021 as aforementioned to carry out enquiry regarding allegations made in the petition Diary No 1894/IN/2021 Case / File No 2383/24/48/2021-WC Registration Date 26/07/2021 by petitioner Yogi M. P. Singh.

    ReplyDelete
Previous Post Next Post