Sachchida Nand Shukla submitted application under section 24 of revenue code to decide boundary of land as government is grabbing

 





An application under section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, U.P. Act No. 8 of 2012 Last Updated 30th March 2021

To

                           Hon’ble Sub divisional Magistrate Sadar

                            District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh

Prayer-Please direct concerned staff of the Tahsil Sadar to settle Dispute regarding boundaries of Araji number326 ख.    as encroachers want to grab the land. 

Detail of the land as aforementioned is attached herewith as annexure 1 to this application. 

Applicant cum complainant- Sachchida Nand Shukla

Name of the father- Mr. Krishna Nand Shukla 

Village- Naugaon , Post- Nadini 

District- Mirzapur , Uttar Pradesh 

PIN Code-231303, Mobile number-7860688249

Versus 

1-Executive Engineer 

Jal Nigam, District- Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh

PIN Code- 231001

2-Gram panchayat through Gram Pradhan 

Village Pachayat- Naugaon

Village- Naugaon , Post- Nadini 

District- Mirzapur , Uttar Pradesh 

PIN Code-231303 

3-Lekhpal, Chandra Bhoosan Shukla 

Tahsil Sadar, District- Mirzapur , Uttar Pradesh 

and others.

Short submissions are as follows.

1-Lekhpal, Chandra Bhoosan Shukla by colluding with Gram Pradhan and Executive Engineer 

Jal Nigam, have made the compound and did the boring in the land aforementioned which illegal and mockery of the law of land. 

2-If the Lekhpal Chandra Bhoosan Shukla claiming the construction made in the Araji number326 क  , then he must ascertain the boundaries of Araji number326 ख. 

3-Please Sir, direct the appropriate authority to decide the boundary of the Araji number326 ख through by pursuing due procedure of the law. 

4-Applicant submitted following grievance on the Jansunwai portal of the government of Uttar Pradesh.

             संदर्भ संख्या : 40019921014923 , दिनांक - 10 Sep 2021 तक की स्थिति

आवेदनकर्ता का विवरण :शिकायत संख्या:-40019921014923 आवेदक का नाम- Sachchida Nand Shukla 

विषय- The matter concerns the grabbing of the land by the Executive Engineer JAL Nigam arbitrarily without adopting due procedure of law by acting in caucus with the other accountable public staffs at the district level which is unconstitutional and arbitrary action by the district administration showing lawlessness and anarchy in the state. The application of the aggrieved addressed to the District Magistrate Mirzapur is attached to this grievance and document concerned with the title of the land is also attached to the grievance. Please restrain executive engineer JAL Nigam from grabbing the land of the applicant illegally even when applicant kept his point before the staffs concerned.  In India, right to property was initially considered as a fundamental right, but later it was scrapped down and became merely a constitutional right by the 44th amendment of the constitution, under the provision of Article 300A. The state has powers to acquire any private land for the public purpose or its own purpose, but this is only possible after giving adequate compensation to the private individual/ party. Here this question arises that why private land of the applicant is being acquired cum grabbed by the Executive Engineer JAL Nigam arbitrarily without adopting due procedure as prescribed under the law of India.  In 1967, the Himachal Pradesh government forcibly took four acres of land from a widow, Vidya Devi, to build road The court delivered the decision in favour of Ms Devi by stating-‘A citizen’s right to own private property is a human right. The state cannot take possession of it without following due procedure and authority of law; the state cannot trespass into the private property of a citizen and then claim ownership of the land in the name of ‘adverse possession’. Grabbing private land and then claiming it as its own makes the state an encroacher’Article 17 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) also recognizes the right to private property, and India is a signatory to that declaration. One thing is to be noted that the framers of our constitution paid sufficient focus to the right to property as they drafted article 19(1) (f) and Article 31 in the constitution.

विभाग -राजस्व एवं आपदा विभागशिकायत श्रेणी -

नियोजित तारीख-07-09-2021शिकायत की स्थिति-

स्तर -तहसील स्तरपद -तहसीलदार

प्राप्त रिमाइंडर-

प्राप्त फीडबैक -दिनांक को फीडबैक:-

फीडबैक की स्थिति -

संलग्नक देखें -Click here

नोट- अंतिम कॉलम में वर्णित सन्दर्भ की स्थिति कॉलम-5 में अंकित अधिकारी के स्तर पर हुयी कार्यवाही दर्शाता है!

अधीनस्थ द्वारा प्राप्त आख्या :

क्र.स. सन्दर्भ का प्रकार आदेश देने वाले अधिकारी आदेश/आपत्ति दिनांक आदेश/आपत्ति आख्या देने वाले अधिकारी आख्या दिनांक आख्या स्थिति संलगनक

1 अंतरित ऑनलाइन सन्दर्भ 08-08-2021 तहसीलदार-सदर,जनपद-मिर्ज़ापुर,राजस्व एवं आपदा विभाग 06-09-2021 आख्या अपलोड कर सेवा में सादर अवलोकनार्थ प्रेषित है निस्तारित

5-Sir in the aforementioned grievance, Lekhpal Chandra Bhoosan Shukla submitted arbitrary and inconsistent report. Which is attached to this application as annexure 2. 

According to him, applicant is habitual to submit grievances, but the factual position is that applicant has submitted only one grievance as aforementioned and his/ Lekhpal Chandra Khoisan Shukla report is retrospective not subsequent showing laxity on the part of him and disregard to Jansunwai portal of government of Uttar Pradesh monitored directly by the chief minister office. 

This is a humble request of your applicant to you, Hon’ble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness and chaos arbitrarily by making the mockery of law of land? There is need of the hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer to win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your applicant shall ever pray for you, Hon’ble Sir.

Date-10/09/2021                          Yours sincerely

                                                      Sachchida Nand Shukla 

address as aforementioned.


1 Comments

Whatever comments you make, it is your responsibility to use facts. You may not make unwanted imputations against any body which may be baseless otherwise commentator itself will be responsible for the derogatory remarks made against any body proved to be false at any appropriate forum.

  1. Jal Nigam, have made the compound and did the boring in the land aforementioned which illegal and mockery of the law of land.

    2-If the Lekhpal Chandra Bhoosan Shukla claiming the construction made in the Araji number- 326 क , then he must ascertain the boundaries of Araji number- 326 ख.

    3-Please Sir, direct the appropriate authority to decide the boundary of the Araji number- 326 ख through by pursuing due procedure of the law.

    ReplyDelete
Previous Post Next Post