Public information officer in Commissionerate Prayagraj denied providing posting details of assistant commissioner Phoolpur


 

Your RTI Appeal filed successfully.

Please note down the details of registration.

Registration Number: SSPPY/A/2023/60073

Name: Yogi M P Singh

Date of Filing :22-09-2023

Request filed with: SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE OFFICE PRAYAGRAJ

 Contact Details  

Telephone Number :9454401015

Email-ID :adlspgangaparaldpolice@gmail.com

Online RTI Appeal Form Details

Public Authority Details :-  

* Public Authority SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE OFFICE PRAYAGRAJ  

Personal Details:-

* Name Yogi M P Singh

Gender Male

* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road, Sangmohal post office

Districts Mirzapur

Pincode 231001

State Uttar Pradesh

Educational Status Literate

Phone Number Details not provided

Mobile Number +91-7379105911

Email-ID yogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com

Citizenship Indian

* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No

First Appeal Details u/s 19(1) :-

Registration Number SSPPY/A/2023/60073

Date of Filing 22/09/2023

Concerned Appellate Authority Nodal Officer

Phone No Details not provided

Email Id Details not provided

* Ground For Appeal Refused access to Information Requested

((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )

* Prayer or Relief Sought Sought information-1-Public information officer may provide the designation and district along with the posting details when Manoj Kumar Singh joined the services of the police. 

2-Public information officer may provide the date and designation when Manoj Kumar Singh joined the district Prayagraj. 

3- Public information officer in the police Commissionerate Prayagraj may provide the chronology of the posting details of the Manoj Kumar Singh posted as the assistant commissioner of police at Phoolpur in Prayagraj district. 

Denial of Information -Ground- Public information officer denied information of three points as aforementioned above by taking the recourse of subsection 1 j of section 8 of the right to information act 2005 which states as far as follows.

(j) information which relates to personal information the disclosure of which has no relationship to any public activity or interest, or which would cause unwarranted invasion of the privacy of the individual unless the Central Public Information Officer or the State Public Information Officer or the appellate authority, as the case may be, is satisfied that the larger public interest justifies the disclosure of such information: 

Provided that the information which cannot be denied to the Parliament or a State Legislature shall not be denied to any person.

Please take a glance of the first page of the attached pdf document to this appeal.

Before submitting my submissions, I want to request to the first appellate authority to take a glance of the second and third page of the attached pdf document which is voluntary disclosure of the information concerning with 

SRI SANTOSH RAI District & Sessions Judge Prayagraj under subsection 1 b of section 4 of the Right to Information Act 2005. As far as the Department of police is concerned no information has been disclosed by the Department of police at the district level under subsection 1 B of section 4 of the right to information act 2005.

The brief submissions of the information seeker cum appellant may be summarised as follows. 

1- Transfer and posting is not a personal information of a personnel but it is working of the public authority which must be transparent and accountable.

2- Right to information act 2005 was introduced by the government of India to promote transparency and accountability in the working of the public authorities.

3- It seems that something is wrong in the promotion of the personnel by the public authority which is the cause, PIO not disclosing the information to the information seeker which must be disclosed by the public authority voluntarily under the provision of right to information at 2005.

4- It is such information are unwarranted invasion  on the privacy of the public personnel then why judicial members are disclosing their information in the public domain voluntarily under the provision of right to information act 2005.

Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))

RTI Application Details u/s 6(1) :-

Registration Number SSPPY/R/2023/60405

Date of Filing 10/07/2023

PIO of Public Authority approached PIOCOOFFICEprj

Designation DYSP

Phone No 954401278

Email Id

PIO Order/Decision Number Details not provided

* PIO Order/Decision Date

Registration Number SSPPY/A/2023/60073

Name Yogi M P Singh

Date of Filing 22/09/2023

Status RTI APPEAL RECEIVED as on 22/09/2023

  Nodal Officer Details  

Name NARENDRA KUMAR SINGH

Telephone Number 9454401015

Email-ID adlspgangaparaldpolice@gmail.com

To see the attached document to the RTI appeal, please click on the link

Yogi

An anti-corruption crusader. Motive to build a strong society based on the principle of universal brotherhood. Human rights defender and RTI activist. Working for the betterment of societies and as an anti-corruption crusader for more than 25 years. Our sole motive is to raise the voices of weaker and downtrodden sections of the society and safeguard their human rights. Our motive is to promote the religion of universal brotherhood among the various castes communities of different religions. Man is great by his deeds and character.

Post a Comment

Whatever comments you make, it is your responsibility to use facts. You may not make unwanted imputations against any body which may be baseless otherwise commentator itself will be responsible for the derogatory remarks made against any body proved to be false at any appropriate forum.

Previous Post Next Post