Electricity distribution division 2nd is not providing electricity connection to Sunita while her sister in law was provided connection

Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2023/0060446

Grievance Concerns To

Name Of Complainant

Mahesh Pratap Singh alias Yogi M. P. Singh

Date of Receipt


Received By Ministry/Department

Uttar Pradesh

Grievance Description

The matter concerns the working of the executive engineer electricity distribution division 2nd district-Mirzapur, PIN code 231001. The matter concerns the injustice with a vulnerable lady belonging to the oppressed section.

It is noticeable that electricity connection by the department has been provided to my sister in-law whose name is Preeti W/O Ashok Prasad and the applicant is still deprived of the electricity connection. Right to reason is the indispensable part of the sound administrative system so it is the obligatory duty of the concerned accountable staff of the Department of electricity to provide the reason of not providing the electricity connection to the applicant.

An application under Article 51 A of the constitution of India on behalf of Sunita D/O Lallu Prajapati and W/O Mangala Prasad to make inquiry regarding the domestic electricity connection whose application number is 1013373200. The address of the aggrieved applicant is as follows.

MI 668, Tehsil Ke Samane ki Gali, Mahuwaria, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, PIN Code-231001, Mobile number-9580275895

This application was submitted before the Purvanchal Vidyut Vitaran Nigam Limited on 8th June 2023 with the payment of Rs.50 as application fee for the connection quite obvious from the first page of the attached pdf document to this grievance.

The short submissions of the applicant in the matter is as follows.

1- Executive engineer electricity distribution division 2nd Mr Rajesh Kumar must disclose the cause of partial treatment to the vulnerable lady.

2- Scan copy of the application paper, individual bond paper, affidavit of the aggrieved applicant and revenue record are attached as the page 2,3, 4 and 5 to the attached documents of the grievance.

3- Whether the partial treatment with the vulnerable lady is not the violation of the human rights of the Lady?

4-Article 14 treats all people the same in the eyes of the law. This provision states that all citizens will be treated equally before the law. The law of the country protects everybody equally. Under the same circumstances, the law will treat people in the same manner. This article prohibits discrimination in any manner. Whether the act of the personnel of the department is not the violation of the Article 14 of the constitution of India in respect at the vulnerable lady.

This is a humble request of the applicant to take a step to provide the justice to the vulnerable lady which is the motive of the government of the Uttar Pradesh under the regime of Yogi Adityanath.

Grievance Document

Current Status

Grievance received   

Date of Action


Officer Concerns To

Forwarded to

Uttar Pradesh

Officer Name

Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary)

Organisation name

Uttar Pradesh

Contact Address

Chief Minister Secretariat , Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow

Email Address


Contact Number


To see the attached pdf document to the grievance, please click on the link


An anti-corruption crusader. Motive to build a strong society based on the principle of universal brotherhood. Human rights defender and RTI activist. Working for the betterment of societies and as an anti-corruption crusader for more than 25 years. Our sole motive is to raise the voices of weaker and downtrodden sections of the society and safeguard their human rights. Our motive is to promote the religion of universal brotherhood among the various castes communities of different religions. Man is great by his deeds and character.

Post a Comment

Whatever comments you make, it is your responsibility to use facts. You may not make unwanted imputations against any body which may be baseless otherwise commentator itself will be responsible for the derogatory remarks made against any body proved to be false at any appropriate forum.

Previous Post Next Post