CCI slaps Rs 1,337.76 cr penalty on Google is an unethical practice of ruling party at centre to create undue pressure on media stalwart



Whoever made the complaints are not sufferers, but masked consumers planted by rivals and ruling party itself so that in the name of action google may be pressurized to work for the promotion of ulterior motives ensured to reach the masses. Undoubtedly this step of the government will affect the transparency in the functioning of the Google because of pressure of the government. 
CCI slaps Rs 1,337.76 cr penalty on Google for unfair biz practices in the Android mobile device ecosystem consequently information sought. 
 CPIO may provide the following information to the information seeker pointwise as sought at the earliest or within the stipulated time of 30 days as prescribed under subsection 1 of section 7 of the Right to Information Act 2005.

1-      CCI slaps Rs 1,337.76 cr penalty on Google for unfair biz practices in the Android mobile device ecosystem. Please provide the status of the recovery of this penalty.

2-      Provide a copy of the document exchanged from Google regarding the recovery of the imposed penalty.

3-      Provide the name and designation of the staff executing the recovery of this penalty.

4-      Please provide the measures taken to ensure transparency and accountability during the enquiry against Google.

5-      It was checked that rivals of google are not wreaking vengeance because could not succeed in the competition. If any such steps were taken, then provide the details.

The Competition Act, of 2002, as amended by the Competition (Amendment) Act, of 2007, follows the philosophy of modern competition laws. The Act prohibits anti-competitive agreements, and abuse of dominant position by enterprises and regulates combinations (acquisition, acquiring of control and M&A), which cause or are likely to cause an appreciable adverse effect on competition within India.

To promote and sustain an enabling competition culture through engagement and enforcement that would inspire businesses to be fair, competitive and innovative; enhance consumer welfare, and support economic growth. 

 

Your RTI Appeal filed successfully.

Please note down the details of registration.

Registration Number CPCOI/A/E/22/00006

Name Yogi M P Singh

Date of Filing 19-11-2022

Appeal filed with Competition Commission of India

 Contact Details  

Telephone Number 011-24664859

Email Id sunil.bhadauria@cci.gov.in

Online RTI Appeal Form Details

RTI Appeal Details :-

   

RTI Appeal Registration number CPCOI/A/E/22/00006

Public Authority Competition Commission of India

   

Personal Details of Appellant:-

Request Registration Number CPCOI/R/E/22/00033

Request Registration Date 21/10/2022

Name Yogi M P Singh

Gender Male

Address Surekapuram colony Laxmi Narayan Baikunth Mahadev , Riva Road, Mirzapur city

Country India

State Uttar Pradesh

Status Urban

Educational Status Literate

  Above Graduate

Phone Number +91-7379105911

Mobile Number +91-7379105911

Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com

Appeal Details :-

Citizenship Indian

Is the Requester Below Poverty Line ? No

Ground For Appeal Provided Incomplete,Misleading or False Information

CPIO of Public Authority approached Kapil Dev Singh

CPIO's Order/Decision Number Details not provided

CPIO's Order/Decision Date

(Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters)

Prayer or Relief Sought

Undoubtedly in this age of globalization, competition among the business rivals is at its peak. Corruption because of greed among the public staff mushrooming in our country and abroad and rival competitors are reaping benefits of it. Consequently raised questions and seeking information.

1-Status of recovery of penalty sought but not available instead provided misleading information.

2-No copy of document exchanged with google made available.

3-Measures taken to ensure transparency and accountability not made available.

4-Government itself taking arbitrary steps to take google under pressure is an unhealthy practice.


Supporting document (only pdf upto 1 MB)

Online RTI First Appeal Status Form

Note:Fields marked with * are Mandatory.


Enter Registration Number CPCOI/A/E/22/00006

Name Yogi M P Singh

Received Date 19/11/2022

Public Authority Competition Commission of India

Status RTI APPEAL RECEIVED

Date of action 19/11/2022

First Appellate Authority Details :- Details not provided

Nodal Officer Details :-

Telephone Number 011-24664859

Email Id sunil[dot]bhadauria[at]cci[dot]gov[dot]in

CCI slaps Rs 1,337.76 cr penalty on Google for unfair biz practices in Android mobile device ecosystem. In a release, the CCI said it has also directed Google to modify its conduct within a defined timeline PTI, OCT 20 2022, 20:56 IST, UPDATED: OCT 20 2022, 20:56 IST

The Competition Commission on Thursday imposed a penalty of Rs 1,337.76 crore on Google for abusing its dominant position in multiple markets in the Android mobile device ecosystem.

Besides, the fair trade regulator has directed the internet major to desist from unfair business practices. In a release, the Competition Commission of India (CCI) said it has also directed Google to modify its conduct within a defined timeline.

In April 2019, the regulator ordered a detailed probe into the matter following complaints by consumers of Android-based smartphones in the country. Android is an open-source, mobile operating system installed by Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) of Smartphones and Tablets.

The allegations of unfair business practices pertained to two agreements -- Mobile Application Distribution Agreement (MADA) and Anti Fragmentation Agreement (AFA) -- which were entered into by the OEMs of Android OS with Google.

In the release, the regulator said it has imposed a penalty of Rs 1,337.76 crore on Google for abusing its dominant position in multiple markets in the Android mobile device ecosystem apart from issuing the cease and desist order.
Beerbhadra Singh

To write blogs and applications for the deprived sections who can not raise their voices to stop their human rights violations by corrupt bureaucrats and executives.

Post a Comment

Whatever comments you make, it is your responsibility to use facts. You may not make unwanted imputations against any body which may be baseless otherwise commentator itself will be responsible for the derogatory remarks made against any body proved to be false at any appropriate forum.

Previous Post Next Post