Second appeal submitted against Ad. Deputy Commissioner in office of police commissioner G.B.N.

 

Welcome UPICR20240000149

UTTAR PRADESH INFORMATION COMMISSION

Second Appeal under section 19(3) of the Right to Information Act, 2005

Appeal Registration Number - A-20240602365

Appeallent's Particulars

Applied Date : 27/06/2024 05:23:21 AM

Name Yogi M P Singh

Gender Male

State UTTAR PRADESH

District MIRZAPUR

Town/Village मिर्जापुर

Pincode 231001

Mobile Number 7379105911

Email yogimpsingh@gmail.com

Address सुरेकापुरम कॉलोनी जबलपुर रोड मिर्जापुर सिटी

Department

Department HOME DEPARTMENT (District)

Division Meerut

District Gautam buddhnagar

Office POLICE COMMISSIONERATE GAUTAM BUDH NAGAR

Details of Request for obtaining information under section 6(1) of RTI Act, 2005

Date of RTI application under section 6(1) 17-01-2024

Is the Applicant below piverty line? No

Section 6(1) Application No. PCGBN/R/2024/60042

Section 6(1) Transaction ID PCGBNR20240000000053

Action Taken by Public Information Officer(PIO)

Answer of P.I.O. Answer incomplete/unsatisfactory/false/misleading etc.

Date of PIO Reply 15-02-2024

Public Information Officer Details

PIO Manish Kumar Mishra

Address Public Information Officer Office - POLICE COMMISSIONERATE GAUTAMBUDHNAGAR

Pincode 203202

Mobile Number 8595902511

Email adcpnoidagbn@gmail.com

Details of First Appeal

Date of First Appeal application under Section 19(1) 16-02-2024

FAA Vidhya Sagar Mishra

Address First Appellate Authority Office - POLICE COMMISSIONERATE GAUTAMBUDHNAGAR

Pincode 203202

Mobile Number 8595902505

Email dcp-polnoida.gb@up.gov.in

FAA Address Details

Answer of First Appellate Authority (FAA) Answer unsatisfactory/false/misleading etc.

Date of Order 18-03-2024

Remarks

Relief sought under Section 19(3)- Second Appeal of the Right to Information Act, 2005 Public information officer denied information by taking recourse of subsection 1 hSection 8 of the right to information act 2005 while the sought information does not concern the investigation

Other Supporting Documents

Document-1 Details Document

Document-2 Details application status

Hearing Option

Hearing Type Offline

Online Hearing Mobile ---

Online Hearing Email ---

Declaration

 I hereby state that the information and particulars given above are true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I also declare that this matter is not previously filed with this commission nor is pending with any Court or tribunal or authority.

Documents Enclosure

Scanned copy of the signed second appeal u/s 19(3) of the Right to Information Act,2005

Document-1

Document-2

Copy of Order

Copy of PIO Reply

Copy of RTI Application under section 6(1)

Copy of First Appeal under section 19(1)

To

Chief Information Commissioner/ Companion Information Commissioners

7/7A, RTI Bhawan, Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, PIN Code-226010

Details of the appellant-Mohalla Surekapuram colony, Jabalpur Road, Sangmohal post office, Districts          Mirzapur, Pincode     231001, State-Uttar Pradesh, Mobile number 7379105911

Details of the respondents-

1-PIO of Public Authority approached-Manish Kumar Mishra

Designation-Ad. Deputy Commissioner of Police.Mobile No          8595902511

Email Id     adcpnoidagbn@gmail.com, District-Gautam Buddha Nagar, Pin Code-203202

2-Concerned Appellate Authority-     Vidhya Sagar Mishra, Mobile No 8595902505, Email Id        dcp-polnoida.gb@up.gov.in District-Gautam Buddha Nagar, Pin Code-203202

Prayer- Public information officer denied information by taking recourse of subsection 1 (h)Section 8 of the right to information act 2005 while the sought information does not concern the investigation.

Short submissions of the appellant are as follows.

1-    It is submitted before the Honourable Sir that the matter concerns the corruption which must be investigated in transparent and accountable way in time bound manner.

Section 173 in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973

173. Report of police officer on completion of investigation.

(1) Every investigation under this Chapter shall be completed without unnecessary delay.

As soon as it is completed, the officer in charge of the police station shall forward to a Magistrate empowered to take cognizance of the offence on a police report.

2-It is submitted before the Honourable Sir that subsection 1 (h)Section 8 of the right to information act 2005 categorically states that information which would impede the process of investigation or apprehension, or prosecution of offenders is exempted from disclosure under right to information act 2005.

3-The matter concerns Gautam Budh Nagar police have busted a gang of eight people who were unscrupulously misusing permanent account number (PAN) cards of 635,000 people for over five years and created 2,660 shell companies to evade Goods and Services Tax (GST) worth multiple crores, deputy commissioner of police (Noida) Harish Chander said on Thursday as reported Jun 02, 2023, 04:48 AM IST by Hindustan Times. The suspects have been identified as Yasin Sheikh, 38, of Mumbai, Akash Saini, 21, of Sahibabad, Atul Sengar, 23, of Hathras, Avni, 25, of Noida, Deepak Murjani, 48, his wife Vinita, 45, Vishal, 20, and Rajeev, 38, (all Delhi). They were apprehended at their office in Madhu Vihar, Delhi. (Sunil Ghosh/HT Photo)

Most respected Sir one year has passed when this matter was reported in various dailies by concerned police itself to glorify its false competency in this largest democracy in the world. How long concerned police will procrastinate in the name of investigation to withhold the information under right to information act 2005?

4-It is quite obvious that more than eight months have passed in the matter and the concerned investigation officer of the police is still withholding the information in the name of continuation of investigation in the matter which means if he provides the information it will impede the process of Investigation.

5-Whether the concerned investigation officer could not submit chargesheet in the concerned competent court which was to be submitted by him as soon as it is completed according to subsection one half section 171 of the code of criminal procedure 1973.

6-Right to information at 2005 was introduced by the government of India to promote transparency and accountability in the working of the public authorities so that corruption growing like jungle fire must be curbed by the government but here in the name of investigation information concerning wide public interest and deep-rooted corruption is being concealed by the police such practises must be stopped.

7-The information sought by appellant is not concerned with the investigation of the sub inspector in the matter. The transparency in the investigation can be guessed easily from the fact that information is not concerning with the investigation, is being withheld by the public information officer. How can it be justified to withhold information; public information officer is allowing the investigation officer to carry out investigation and making undue delay.

8-Description of information sought by the appellant are as follows.

1- This matter is a huge scandal concerning the Department of income tax therefore public information officers may provide the reason for not informing the department of income tax regarding this matter as right to reason is the indispensable part of a sound administrative system.

2- Because of this syndicate huge loss to the public exchequer occurred which must be taken into account. Public information officer may provide a copy of the communication exchanged with the department of the central government in the matter.

3- This matter concerns the economic offence so please provide a copy of the communication exchanged with the economic offensive wing of the state government because the investigation officer of the police is not well equipped to investigate the matter.

4- Public information officer may provide the copy of those communications in the matter which does not concern the investigation of the investigation officer.

5- Public information officer may provide the time of limitation to complete the investigation by the investigation officer as the matter concerns the wide public interest so it must be completed in a time bound manner.

This is a humble request of your applicant to you Hon'ble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness, and chaos arbitrarily by making the mockery of law of land? There is need of the hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer to win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your appellant shall ever pray for you, Hon’ble Sir.

Date-27/06/2024                                                Yours sincerely.

 

Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911,

Mohalla- Surekapuram colony, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar

Pradesh, PIN code-231001.



Yogi

An anti-corruption crusader. Motive to build a strong society based on the principle of universal brotherhood. Human rights defender and RTI activist. Working for the betterment of societies and as an anti-corruption crusader for more than 25 years. Our sole motive is to raise the voices of weaker and downtrodden sections of the society and safeguard their human rights. Our motive is to promote the religion of universal brotherhood among the various castes communities of different religions. Man is great by his deeds and character.

Post a Comment

Your view points inspire us

Previous Post Next Post