Showing posts with label Growing corruption in police. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Growing corruption in police. Show all posts

Smt Radha Rastogi submitted grievance against land grabbing because of inaction of Budaun police in good governance of Uttar Pradesh





To fix accountability of inspector Kotwali and sub inspector Anil Kumar Rana, Radha Rastogi sought information from Budaun police

 Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2024/0019936

Grievance Concerns To

Name Of Complainant

Smt Radha Rastogi

Date of Receipt

19/03/2024

Received By Ministry/Department

Uttar Pradesh

Grievance Description

SSP BUDAUN MAY KINDLY -

Instead of submitting proper consistent report in the matter concerned sub inspector is submitting arbitrary, inconsistent and misleading reports having no relevance with the points of the grievance. This is deliberate attempt to deviate attention of the supervisory body and the applicant from core issue must be taken seriously by the senior rank officer in the department under the supervision of the senior superintendent of police Budaun.

Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2024/0000969

Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant-Vimal Kumar Rastogi, Date of Receipt- 04/01/2024, Received By Ministry/Department-Uttar Pradesh

To curb the misuse of section 151/107/116 of criminal procedure code, the government of Uttar Pradesh in order to comply with the direction of the High court of judicature at Allahabad issued the circular dated 09 September 2021 attached as Page 1 of the attached PDF documents.

How can there be apprehension of a breach of peace because my son who is employed in a company and workplace is Gautam Buddh Nagar Noida? It is quite obvious that police are wreaking vengeance with the applicant because the applicant is submitting a grievance as police are adopting lackadaisical approach to take action against the offenders.


The applicant is making enquiry under article 51A of the constitution of India regarding the misuse of the provisions of law by the concerned police and misleading the senior rank officers in the department by submitting the inconsistent and arbitrary misleading reports in the matter.


1- Provide the posting details of sub inspector Anil Kumar Rana including date of joining in the district-Budaun as well as first posting details when he joined the service of the police with last posting details.


2- Provide the posting details of inspector of police station-Kotwali with name and designation including date of joining in the district-Budaun as well as first posting details when he joined the service of the police with last posting details.


3- Right to reason is an indispensable part of the sound administrative system therefore PIO may provide the reason for unsigned general diary details attached as page 2 of PDF document to this RTI application.


4- Please provide the name and designation of the executive magistrate before whom this unsigned general diary details was submitted by sub inspector Anil Kumar Rana and the executive magistrate accepted it.


5- Land under dispute is the registered land in the name of my husband Vimal Kumar Rastogi but police said in reports that it is a matter of partition. Please provide the reason of it.


6-In sub judice matter in which adjudication is pending before competent court, how can police allow grabbing of land by offenders in the form of new construction ipso facto? Please provide the reason of not registering the F.I.R. after numerous representations of the husband of the aggrieved applicant.

Think about the gravity of situation concerned investigation officer is mentioning the details of a case which adjudication is pending before the appropriate court of the law and having no relevance in the current matter of the land grabbing by the offenders.


Because of the ambiguous report of the investigation officer core issue of the matter remains untouched by the investigation officer which only promotes the corruption in the working of the police and creates a suspense in the working style of the police. In the sub judice matter, offenders are not taking seriously the violations of the provisions of law in the matter in which they themselves filed suit and now police is saying that I should wait the adjudication of the court.


Undoubtedly the applicant and her family members are law abiding citizens will wait for the decision of the court but in meanwhile the police must register First information report against the offenders who grabbed the land by doing construction in the impugned land.

Grievance Document

Current Status

Grievance received   

Date of Action

19/03/2024

Officer Concerns To

Forwarded to

Uttar Pradesh

Officer Name

Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary)

Organisation name

Uttar Pradesh

Contact Address

Chief Minister Secretariat , Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow

Email Address

bhaskar.12214@gov.in

Contact Number

05222226350

To see the attached document to the grievance, please click on the link

Thieves stole two bikes from premise of Mauaima police station Prayagraj on the same day showing real picture law-order

Payment Details:-

RTI Fee Received: 10

Online Reference number : IK0COXLNS4

Transaction Status: Success 

Registration Number DGPOF/R/2024/60004

Name Yogi M P Singh

Date of Filing 01/01/2024

Status RTI REQUEST RECEIVED as on 01/01/2024

  Nodal Officer Details  

Name DINESH KUMAR DWIVEDI

Telephone Number 9454405121

Email-ID rti.dgphq-up@gov.in

Online RTI Request Form Details

Public Authority Details: -   

* Public Authority Director General of Police Office  

Personal Details of RTI Applicant: -

Registration Number DGPOF/R/2024/60004

Date of Filing 01/01/2024

* Name Yogi M P Singh

Gender Male

* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road, Sangmohal post office

Districts Mirzapur

Pin code 231001

State Uttar Pradesh

Educational Status Literate

  Above Graduate

Phone Number Details not provided

Mobile Number +91-7379105911

Email-ID yogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com

Citizenship Indian

* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No

RTI Application Details u/s 6(1) :-

((Description of Information sought (up to 500 characters)

* Description of Information Sought In Prayagraj, a case of theft of two bikes was reported from the police station on the same day. The thieves have embarrassed the police. Thieves have also stolen a dozen bikes in the area in the last three months.

Those who have the responsibility of guarding the society, their own house is no longer safe. A sample of this was seen in Mauaima police station of Prayagraj district. Thieves blew up two bikes in one day from the police station premises. Thieves have also stolen a dozen bikes in the area in the last three months.

On December 1, Shivsagar Patel, a resident of village Naugira, came to Mauaima police station with a complaint. Meanwhile, the bike was parked in the police station premises and thieves blew it up. In front of this, another bike parked in the old police station premises also disappeared by the thieves. Consequently the thieves stole two bicycles on the first December 2023. For the more details, please take a glance of the news story published in the leading daily Amarujala on 5th December 2023 which is attached as the pdf document to this online RTI application. 

Public information officer in the office of Director General of Police Uttar Pradesh must provide the following information print wise as follows. 

1- Public information officer must provide the information concerning circular, office memo government orders exchanged with the commissioner of police prayagraj regarding to curb the growing criminal activities in this class one district because of the dereliction of duty of the police personnel. 

2- Please provide the action taken by the commissioner of police Prayagraj in the case of steep hike in the cases of theft concerning bikes under the jurisdiction of police station Mauaima district Prayagraj which is quite obvious from the attached document to the online rtia application.

3-People say that In incidents of bike theft, the police do not register a case in the first place. If anyhow the case is registered on the instructions of senior rank authorities, then in the name of investigation, it is put into a cold bag.

​Right to reason is an indispensable part of a sound administrative system, so provide the reason for the procrastination of the police in registering the first information report in cases of bike theft​.

4- Please provide the case detail if any worked out by the Mauaima police concerning the theft of motorcycles/bikes in the last 6 months.

5- Please provide the punitive action taken by the commissioner of police on the rise of the theft of motorcycles/bikes against the police personnel to fix accountability.

6- Please provide the communications exchanged by the commissioner of police Prayagraj with the station house officer of police station Mauaima or circle officer Phoolpur concerning the steep hike in theft cases of bikes. 

Public information officer must provide 6 point information to the information seeker within stipulated 30 days as prescribed under subsection one of section 7 of the right to information act 2005.

* Concerned PIO Nodal Officer

Designation Details not provided.

Phone No Details not provided.

Email Id Details not provided.

Supporting document ((only pdf up to 1 MB))

Hindi News ›   Uttar Pradesh ›   Prayagraj News ›   Two Bikes Stolen From Mauaima Police Station Of Prayagraj In A Single Day

गजब के चोर: यहां चोरों ने पुलिस थाने में ही डाला डाका, एक ही दिन में दो बाइक चोरी, शर्मसार हुई 'खाकी'

अमर उजाला नेटवर्क, प्रयागराज Published by: शाहरुख खान Updated Tue, 05 Dec 2023 02:55 PM IST

प्रयागराज

प्रयागराज में पुलिस थाने से एक ही दिन में दो बाइक चोरी करने का मामला सामने आया है। चोरों ने पुलिस की किरकिरी करा दी है। इसके अलावा चोर पिछले तीन माह में क्षेत्र में एक दर्जन बाइक चोरी कर चुके हैं।

जिन पर समाज के रखवाली की जिम्मेदारी है उनका अपना घर भी अब सुरक्षित नहीं रहा। इसका नमूना प्रयागराज जिले के मऊआइमा थाने में देखने को मिला। थाना परिसर से ही एक दिन में चोरों ने दो बाइक उड़ा दी। इसके अलावा चोर पिछले तीन माह में क्षेत्र में एक दर्जन बाइक चोरी कर चुके हैं।

एक दिसंबर को ग्राम नौगिरा निवासी शिवसागर पटेल मऊआइमा थाने में फरियाद लेकर आए थे। इस बीच थाना परिसर में खड़ी बाइक चोरों ने उड़ा दी। इसी के सामने पुराने थाना परिसर में खड़ी एक अन्य बाइक भी चोरों ने गायब कर दी।

आठ नवंबर को प्रतापगढ़ के अजीत नगर मुकुंदगंज निवासी ओमप्रकाश पड़ाव चौराहा निवासी अपने बहनोई संतोष कुमार से मिलने आए थे। चोरों ने उनकी बाइक उड़ा दी। 11 नवंबर को प्रतापगढ़ के थाना हथिगवां निवासी रंजीत यादव की बाइक मऊआइमा स्थित एक निजी अस्पताल के सामने से चोरी हो गई।

15 अक्तूबर को मोहल्ला मौलाना निवासी मुअज्जम अली की घर के सामने खड़ी बाइक शुक्रवार को चोरों ने उड़ा दी। 29 सितंबर को पुरखीपुर गांव निवासी रामचंद्र की बाइक चोरी हो गई। 18 सितंबर को हरिसेनगंज बाजार निवासी शंकरलाल के घर के बाहर खड़ी मोटरसाइकिल पर चोरों ने हाथ साफ कर दिया था।

15 सितंबर को देल्हूपुर थाना क्षेत्र के देवईनी निवासी छात्र विवेक कुमार की बाइक थाने के पास स्थित कोचिंग सेंटर से चोरों ने गायब कर दी। 12 सितंबर को रतनसेनपुर गांव निवासी नवाब अली की बाइक चोरों ने उड़ा दी। 

लोगों को कहना है कि बाइक चोरी जैसी घटनाओं में पुलिस पहले तो मुकदमा दर्ज नहीं करती। यदि अधिकारियों के निर्देश पर मुकदमा दर्ज भी कर लिया जाता है तो जांच के नाम पर उसे ठंडे बस्ते में डाल दिया जाता है।

बाइक चोरी की घटनाओं पर अंकुश के लिए पुलिस सक्रिय है,जल्द ही मामलों का पर्दाफाश किया जाएगा। -वीरेंद्र कुमार कुशवाहा-प्रभारी निरीक्षक, मऊआइमा


Budaun police calling grabbing of purchased land of Vimal Kumar Rastogi a dispute of partition of land and provided safe haven to offenders

Grievance Status for registration number: GOVUP/E/2023/0085879

Grievance Concerns To

Name Of Complainant

Vimal Kumar Rastogi

Date of Receipt

26/12/2023

Received By Ministry/Department

Uttar Pradesh

Grievance Description

To curb the misuse of section 151/107/116 of criminal procedure code, the government of Uttar Pradesh in order to comply with the direction of the High court of judicature at Allahabad issued the circular dated 09 September 2021 attached as Page 1 of the attached PDF document. Form the contents of the aforementioned circular, it was directed to entire accountable staff of the department of police that powers provided to police officer under section 151/107/116 of the criminal penal code is discretionary power of police must be used with due caution otherwise pecuniary penalty of Rs.25000 may be imposed on the police if found guilty of the abusing the tools. 

How can there be apprehension of a breach of peace because my son who is employed in a company and workplace is Gautam Buddh Nagar Noida? It is quite obvious that police are wreaking vengeance with the applicant because the applicant is submitting a grievance as police are adopting lackadaisical approach to take action against the offenders. 

Police are justifying the land grabbing in the name partition awaited between the applicant and offenders but factual position is that offenders are grabbing the land which was purchased by the applicant on 19 July 1985 which means 38 years ago quite obvious from scan copy papers of registry executed by registrar Raj Bahadur Saxena between the applicant who is purchaser and Kanhai Lal Sarin S/O Raj Bahadur Sarin who is the seller of the land. Please take a glance of the last five pages of the attached PDF document to the grievance. The police submitted an arbitrary and inconsistent parrot report in the following grievance which is highly objectionable to the applicant. Concerned police may ask offenders to remove cars and other materials including construction work from the land of the applicant purchased from Kanhai Lal Sarin S/O Raj Bahadur Sarin whose measurement is 68 sq metres.The applicant has paid the price of the land and requisite fee to government for obtaining title of the land. How can partition claim of police in report be justified in the land of the applicant which is purchased land of the applicant. Grievance Status for registration number: GOVUP/E/2023/0081796, Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant-Vimal Kumar Rastogi, Date of Receipt-09/12/2023, Received By Ministry/Department-Uttar Pradesh

Grievance Description-Concerned police submitted arbitrary and inconsistent reports in the following grievance and whatever report has been submitted by the police concerning the assault on the applicant by the offenders. It is noticeable that the current matter concerns the grabbing of the land which adjudication is pending before the court of the law which is self-obvious from the report of the police submitted in the earlier grievances and in this grievance also. The offenders are doing construction quite obvious from the attached photographs to the grievance so please act instead of overlooking the matter by submitting inconsistent and arbitrary reports in the matter.

Under Article 51 A of the constitution of India the applicant who is a senior citizen making following enquiries to the concerned investigation officer who is also the in charge of the Kotwali named Anil Kumar Rana. The applicant has full faith that he will not respond following queries properly as usual done by the concerned police.

1-It is quite from the attached reports of the police that the information seeker submitted repeated representations before Budaun police, but police did not register first information report in the matter of land grabbing by taking recourse that adjudication is pending in the court regarding the matter.

Please provide the canon law which allows the litigant to grab the land which adjudication is pending in the court of law.

2-Please provide the order of the competent court which allowed Dinesh Kumar Gupta S/O Ram Bahadur Gupta to grab the land of the information seeker.

Please remove encroachment otherwise register FIR.

Grievance Document

Current Status

Grievance received   

Date of Action

26/12/2023

Officer Concerns To

Forwarded to

Uttar Pradesh

Officer Name

Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary)

Organisation name

Uttar Pradesh

Contact Address

Chief Minister Secretariat , Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow

Email Address

bhaskar.12214@gov.in

Contact Number

05222226350

Reminder(s) / Clarification(s)

Reminder Date

Remarks

26/12/2023

3-Concerned police must provide the efforts made by it to remove the encroachment made by Dinesh Kumar Gupta S/O Ram Bahadur Gupta in the land of the information seeker.

4-Kotwali police says that the information seeker and his family members are fugitive as told by few people even Kotwal said it publicly.

Please provide the court proceedings in detail to the information seeker which was not attended by the information seeker and his family members.

5-Please provide the code of conduct for police which allows them to act like rumour mongers against senior citizens husband and wife who are living with his son because protection could not be provided by the police even after repeated requests. Police ignores the offenses the offenders in the name of adjudication are pending which promoted anarchy.

Grievance Status for registration number: GOVUP/E/2023/0081796

Grievance Concerns To

Name Of Complainant

Vimal Kumar Rastogi

Date of Receipt

09/12/2023

Received By Ministry/Department

Uttar Pradesh

Grievance Description

Concerned police submitted arbitrary and inconsistent report in the following grievance and whatever report has been submitted by the police concerning the assault on the applicant by the offenders. It is noticeable that the current matter concerns the grabbing of the land which adjudication is pending before the court of the law which is self-obvious from the report of the police submitted in the earlier grievances and in this grievance also. The offenders are doing construction quite obvious from the attached photographs to the grievance so please act instead of overlooking the matter by submitting inconsistent and arbitrary reports in the matter.

Grievance Status for registration number: GOVUP/E/2023/0075979, Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant- Vimal Kumar Rastogi, Date of Receipt-15/11/2023, Received By Ministry/Department-Uttar Pradesh

It is quite obvious that the applicant has attached the sequence of photographs of the construction and encroachment done by the offenders which must be considered by the concerned sub inspector and the Kotwal of the Kotwali under whose signature the partial report submitted on the public grievance portal by the police of the district Budaun. In this sequence of photographs there are 30 pictures which are showing, how the construction took place under the monitoring of the offenders? It is noticeable that video of the construction watch provided by the aggrieved applicant on the WhatsApp of the concerned sub inspector who was investigating the matter whose name is Anil Kumar Rana designation-sub inspector cum in-charge.

Budaun police is not registering F.I.R. of senior citizen in matter of land grabbing and overlooked repeated complaints of the applicant Vimal Kumar Rastogi.

Whether the pending adjudications in civil matters provide immunity to defenders from registering criminal cases against them. Whether such lackadaisical approach of the police in dealing with the criminal matters will not promote criminal activities in the society ipso facto police is overlooking the matter on the flimsy ground only promoting offenders. Here this question arises that why is the police is sympathetic to the offenders instead of senior citizen who is the victim in the crime committed by the offenders?

Under Article 51 A of the constitution of India the applicant who is a senior citizen making following enquiries to the concerned investigation officer who is also the in charge of the Kotwali named Anil Kumar Rana. The applicant has full faith that he will not respond following queries properly as usual done by the concerned police.

1-It is quite from the attached reports of the police that information seeker submitted repeated representations before Budaun police, but police did not register first information report in the matter of land grabbing by taking recourse that adjudication is pending in the court regarding the matter.

Please provide the canon law which allows the litigant to grab the land which adjudication is pending in the court of law.

2-Please provide the order of the competent court which allowed Dinesh Kumar Gupta S/O Ram Bahadur Gupta to grab the land of the information seeker.

3-Concerned police must provide the efforts made by it to remove the encroachment made by Dinesh Kumar Gupta S/O Ram Bahadur Gupta in the land of the information seeker.

4-Kotwali police says that the information seeker and his family members are fugitive as told by few people even Kotwal said it publicly.

Please provide the court proceedings in detail to the information seeker which was not attended by the information seeker and his family members.

5-Please provide the code of conduct for police which allows it to act like rumour mongers against senior citizens husband and wife who are living with his son because of the protection could not be provided by the police even after repeated requests. Police ignores the offenses the offenders in the name of adjudication are pending which promoted

Grievance Document

Current Status

Case closed   

Date of Action

22/12/2023

Remarks

श्रीमान जी प्रार्थना पत्र की जांच संलग्न है

Reply Document

Rating

1

Poor

Rating Remarks

NotSatisfied

Appeal Details

Appeal Number

Date of Receipt

Appeal Text

Current Status

Officer Concerns To

Officer Name

Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary)

Organisation name

Government of Uttar Pradesh

Contact Address

Chief Minister Secretariat , Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow

Email Address

bhaskar.12214@gov.in

Contact Number

05222226350

To see the attached document to the grievance, please click on the link

Chauri Bajar police submitted arbitrary reports in matter of land grabbing under supervision of S.P. Bhadohi and chief minister office

 


Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2023/0077000

Grievance Concerns To

Name Of Complainant

Anand Kumar Tiwari

Date of Receipt

19/11/2023

Received By Ministry/Department

Uttar Pradesh

Grievance Description

The matter concerns the working of the Superintendent of police Sant Ravidas Nagar Bhadohi. Most respected Sir there are 8 pages attached as PDF documents to the grievance. The first page is the report signed by station house officer chauri bazar and concerned investigation officer. In this report names of the members of the opposite party are 1-Vidyadhar Tiwari 2-WakiL Dhar Tiwari 3-Tahsildhar Tiwari and the father of these members is Ramchandra Tiwari. This report is dated 3rd October 2023.

The second page of the attached PDF document it is quite obvious that on 14th August 2023 the same report was submitted on the jansunwai portal of the government of Uttar Pradesh.

Similar report was submitted on 28th September 2023 by the investigation officer Rameshwar Nath Yadav the only difference in this report is that it was not signed by station house officer Chauri Bazar.

It is quite obvious from the 3rd page of the attached PDF document to the grievance.

The 4th page of the attached PDF document is the report of the circle officer doctor Umeshwar Prabhat Singh, Aurai, district bhadohi and this report is dated 3rd September 2023.

In this report members of the opposition party are Ashutosh Tripathi S/O late Rajesh Tripathi and Pradeep Tripathi S/O Tejdhar Tripathi.

The 6th page is the report of the station house officer Chauri Bazar addressed to the additional Superintendent of police/nodal officer Right to information district-Sant Ravidas Nagar Bhadohi, dated 30th November 2023 uploaded on the portal of the government of Uttar Pradesh.

In this report also members of the opposition party are Ashutosh Tripathi S/O late Rajesh Tripathi and Pradeep Tripathi S/O Tejdhar Tripathi.

Think about the credibility of the report submitted by the police on the jansunwai portal of the government of Uttar Pradesh which is monitored by the office of the chief minister government of Uttar Pradesh.

Land grabbing is a criminal matter dealt under Cr.P.C. and I.P.C., land dispute in which title is decided through verdict of court is civil case. Forcible possession of the land constitutes the offence of land grabbing which is a criminal offence because this grabbing of land has been done by force not by the order of a competent court or magistrate. Police are escaping from the matter because of corruption.

Section441 (Criminal Trespass): When someone unlawfully enters a property, or lawfully enters a property but unlawfully remains there (such as a tenant after expiration of tenancy) with the intent to commit an offence, or to intimidate, insult or annoy the person in possession of such property, it amounts to criminal trespass. Section 425 (Mischief): When someone intentionally or knowingly causes destruction of a property or any change in a property that diminishes its value or utility, they are said to commit “mischief”. Section420 (Cheating): This provision is applied when someone cheats and deceives you into delivering any property to someone else. #Section 442 (House Trespass):This is a form of “criminal trespass” wherein the trespasser unlawfully enters a human dwelling, or any building used as a place of worship or as place for the custody of property. Section 503 (Criminal Intimidation): Any threat of injury to person, reputation or property with the intent to cause them to do something which they are not legally bound to do is a form of “criminal intimidation”. This is a humble request of your applicant to you Hon'ble Sir that It can never be justified to overlook the rights of the citizenry by delivering services in an arbitrary manner by floating all set up norms. This is sheer mismanagement which is encouraging wrongdoers to reap the benefit of loopholes in the system and depriving poor citizens of the right to justice. Therefore it is need of the hour to take concrete steps in order to curb grown anarchy in the system. For this, your applicant shall ever pray to you, Honourable Sir.

Grievance Document

Current Status

Grievance received   

Date of Action

19/11/2023

Officer Concerns To

Forwarded to

Uttar Pradesh

Officer Name

Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary)

Organisation name

Uttar Pradesh

Contact Address

Chief Minister Secretariat , Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow

Email Address

bhaskar.12214@gov.in

Contact Number

05222226350

To see the attached document to the grievance, please click on the link

Senior citizens are no more safe from missed iiritating calls by rowdy elements so Vimal Kumar Rastogi made complaint to commissioner

Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2023/0070839

Grievance Concerns To

Name Of Complainant

Vimal Kumar Rastogi

Date of Receipt

24/10/2023

Received By Ministry/Department

Uttar Pradesh

Grievance Description

The matter concerns working of commissioner of police Gautam Buddh Nagar, Noida, Uttar Pradesh so it must be forwarded abruptly for swift action in the matter.

Mobile number of Dinesh Gupta-8448031966, This person used to make irritating missed calls on the mobile numbers of family members of the applicant. In the Truecaller the name of the missed call is Mr X but in brackets it is written Dinesh Gupta, quite obvious from the attached PDF document of the screen shot taken out from the mobile handset. To see the missed call details, I attached a PDF document to the grievance. The address of Dinesh Kumar Gupta is as follows.

Address-Garhaiya , Shahbajpur, Patiyali Sarai, District-Budaun, Pin Code 243601, State Uttar Pradesh

The applicant is a 77 years old senior citizen currently living at the following address because my son is employed in a company which has offices in Noida.

The current address of the applicant is Flat 701, Tower CS 10, Capetown Supertech, plot GH 01-A Sector 74 Noida, Gautam Buddh Nagar U.P. 201301 under police station- sector 113 and police chowki- Sorkha chowki

To

Commissioner of Police

Gautam Buddh Nagar U.P. 201301

Subject- Please take action against the offender Dinesh Kumar Gupta under the appropriate sections of Indian penal code for making irritating missed calls on the mobile numbers of the family members of the applicant.

The brief description of the case may be summarised as follows.

1-Dinesh Kumar Gupta is a habitual offender to harass the applicant and his family members for it he was registered under the case as Budaun police registered him under section 323, 504 and 506 of the Indian penal code along with his companions.

2-The applicant and his family members are familiar with his uncivil behaviour so we do not pick up his phone calls but still he is not stopping such phone calls quite obvious from the attached missed call list.

3-Because of the rowdy and assaulting behaviour of the offender Dinesh Kumar Gupta the applicant and his wife left the native village and are living with their son because he is habitual to breach the peace of the applicant and his family.

4-We are law-abiding citizens, please protect us from rowdy Dinesh Kumar Gupta and his criminal activities who is always in search of tricks to Harass family members and applicants.

5-The jealousy of the offender Dinesh Kumar Gupta is quite obvious from the fact that he sent two emails against my son Rahul Kumar Rastogi to his senior rank officers of the company by making baseless allegations against him. The offender Dinesh Kumar Gupta always conspires to lower the image of the applicant and his family members through baseless allegations.

This is a humble request of the applicant to take action against the rowdy Dinesh Kumar Gupta under the appropriate section of the Indian Penal Code who made the lives of the family members of the applicant and the applicant itself hell. For this, the applicant shall ever pray to you most respected sir.

Grievance Document

Current Status

Grievance received   

Date of Action

24/10/2023

Officer Concerns To

Forwarded to

Uttar Pradesh

Officer Name

Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary)

Organisation name

Uttar Pradesh

Contact Address

Chief Minister Secretariat , Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow

Email Address

bhaskar.12214@gov.in

Contact Number

05222226350

Superintendent of police S.R.N. Bhadohi overlooked grabbing of land by inconsistent partial report so information sought from him.

 

Your RTI Request filed successfully.

Please note down the following details for further references.

Registration Number SPSRN/R/2023/60070

Name Anand Kumar Tiwari

Date of Filing 15-10-2023

RTI Fee Received    10

Online Reference Number IK0CMHUAS2

Transaction Status Success

Request filed with SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE OFFICE SANT RAVIDAS NAGAR (BHADOHI)

 Contact Details of Nodal Officer  

Telephone Number 9454401115

Email-ID aspbdi@gmail.com

Online RTI Request Form Details

Public Authority Details :-

   

* Public Authority SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE OFFICE SANT RAVIDAS NAGAR (BHADOHI)

   

Personal Details of RTI Applicant:-

Registration Number SPSRN/R/2023/60070

Date of Filing 15/10/2023

* Name Anand Kumar Tiwari

Gender Male

* Address S/O Wakil Dhar Tiwari Village Kandui , Post Darunhan, Police station Chauri Bajar, Tehsi and block Sant Ravidas Nagar Bhadohi

Districts Sant Ravidas Nagar

Pincode 221402

State Uttar Pradesh

Educational Status Details not provided

Phone Number Details not provided

Mobile Number +91-9029116778

Email-ID anandkumartiwaribhadohi[at]gmail[dot]com

Citizenship Indian

* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No

RTI Application Details u/s 6(1) :-

((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )

* Description of Information Sought  Land grabbing refers to any activity by which someone occupies or attempts to occupy any land over which they do not have any lawful entitlement. They may or may not use force, threats or intimidation with a view to illegally possess the land or create illegal tenancies or sell or construct unauthorized structures thereon. Whether land grabbers have  lawful entitlement in the current matter? Police must provide the copy of title awarded by competent court or magistrate to them otherwise register case against them of land grabbing?  

Tej Dhar Tiwari S/O Ram Chandra Tiwari is trespassing the land of my grandfather late Vakil Dhar Tiwari S/O Ram Chandra Tiwari by setting pegs to tie buffalo and feeding cattle.

The applicant is making inquiry to the investigation officer and circle officer concerned under Article 51 A of the constitution of India, where is the opposition party who were mentioned in the grievance as Tej Dhar Tiwari S/O Ram Chandra Tiwari and his sons.

Public information officer in the office of Superintendent of police district Sant Ravidas Nagar Bhadohi may provide the following information to the information seeker point wise as follows.

1- Sir, the complaint of land grabbing by the applicant was made against Tej Dhar Tiwari son of Ramchandra Tiwari, in which his sons were also involved. Under which law was the investigating officer detaining the remaining three brothers and their sons under sections 151, 107 and 116 of the Criminal Procedure Code? Please provide the provisions of the law available in the country. 

2- Sir, the applicant should be informed whether the complaint of the applicant was processed by the investigating officer after taking perusal of it if not done before submitting the report, then why, he should provide the reason? 

3- Sir, provide the name, designation and date of joining the district of the investigating officer to the information seeker. 

4- Sir, explain whether the case of land grabbing is civil or a criminal case if someone is forcibly taking the possession obvious from the matter. 

5-Public information officer should provide the copy of the order of the competent magistrate available to the police which allowed the grabbing of the land by the offenders.

Public information officer in the office of Superintendent of police may provide the 5 point information within stipulated time of 30 days as prescribed under subsection one of Section 7 of the right to information Act 2005.

* Concerned PIO Nodal Officer

Designation Details not provided

Phone No Details not provided

Email Id Details not provided

Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))

Registration Number SPSRN/R/2023/60070

Name Anand Kumar Tiwari

Date of Filing 15/10/2023

Status RTI REQUEST RECEIVED as on 15/10/2023

  Nodal Officer Details  

Name Rajesh Bharti

Telephone Number 9454401115

Email-ID aspbdi@gmail.com

To see the report of police submitted on the Jansunwai portal, click on the link

Sangita Kumari seeking shelter of Government against the inaction of police in registering First Information Report against offenders

 



Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2023/0067658

Grievance Concerns To

Name Of Complainant

Sangita Kumari

Date of Receipt

10/10/2023

Received By Ministry/Department

Uttar Pradesh

Grievance Description

The matter concerns the working of the station house officer police station Adalat who is not taking any action in the matter under the pressure of the gram pradhan of the village panchayat which is unjustified and can never be accepted in good governance.

To

Honourable Superintendent of police

district Mirzapur Uttar Pradesh pin code 231001

Subject-Procrastination by the station house officer police station adalahat district Mirzapur in registering the first information report against the offenders in the matter which is reported to the station house officer on 19th September 2023.

Case details are as follows.

Place of tragic incidence-village-Ghurahupur, post-pachegada, block-Narayanpur, police station-Adalahat, Tehsil- Chunar, district Mirzapur

Time of the tragic incident-6 o clock in the evening and date of it is 19th September 2023.

The Names of the offenders are as follows.

1-Manish S/O Munna, 2- Sandeep son of Vijendra

It is noticeable that both the offenders were in the police custody on the next day but it is most unfortunate station house officer Adal hat did not perform the proceedings of the first information report and both the accused we are set scot-free by the station house officer in cryptic and mysterious manner.

The brief description of the submissions of the applicant is as follows.

1-Both the offenders not only assulted the applicant seriously but they also snatched the gold ornaments worn by the publicant in nose and ears.

2-Right to reason is the indispensable part of sound administrative system therefore it is an obligatory duty of the station house officer who must disclose the reason why had he freed the offenders without pursuing the prescribed norms setup by the government of Uttar Pradesh in such matters.

3-Whether it is not reflecting the lackadaisical and corrupt approach of the station house officer in matters dealing with the criminal elements which will only promote corruption in the department.

4-Whether the derogatory remarks by the gram pradhan on the victim before the police is not the violation of the human rights of a woman? How can it be allowed in a police station which reflects only indiscipline in the working of the police?

5-How can it be justified that station house officer, police station- Adalahat may create undue pressure on the applicant to withdraw the case under the pressure of gram pradhan which is a mockery of the law of land and such practices must be curbed by the accountable staff in the department of police.

6-The treatment of the police in the police station Adal hat was the violation of the human rights of the applicant because they took under teeth the provisions of the law by making mockery of it who created not only embarrassing situation for a woman but also insulted her with their their derodatory and obscene remarks. Whether the police in the state of Uttar Pradesh regards the women in the state in such a way which is not reflecting a civilized society

This is a humble request of the applicant to the superintendent of police district Mirzapur to order and enquiry by a senior rank officer so that accountability can be fixed of the police personnel humiliating a woman seeking justice from them. O God help me.

Grievance Document

Current Status

Grievance received   

Date of Action

10/10/2023

Officer Concerns To

Forwarded to

Uttar Pradesh

Officer Name

Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary)

Organisation name

Uttar Pradesh

Contact Address

Chief Minister Secretariat , Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow

Email Address

bhaskar.12214@gov.in

Contact Number

05222226350

To see the attached document to the grievance, please click on the link

Police can summon an individual to police station through serving proper notice in compliance with order of Lucknow bench of High court

 

Your RTI Request filed successfully.

Please note down the following details for further references.

Registration Number DOCMO/R/2023/61219

Name Yogi M P Singh

Date of Filing 15-09-2023

RTI Fee Received    10

Online Reference Number IK0CLHDXW6

Transaction Status Success

Request filed with Chief Minister office

 Contact Details of Nodal Officer  

Telephone Number 05222216455

Email-ID sanjay.10972@gov.in

Online RTI Request Form Details

Public Authority Details :-

   

* Public Authority Chief Minister office

   

Personal Details of RTI Applicant:-

Registration Number DOCMO/R/2023/61219

Date of Filing 15/09/2023

* Name Yogi M P Singh

Gender Male

* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road, Sangmohal post office

Pincode 231001

State Uttar Pradesh

Educational Status Literate

  Above Graduate

Phone Number Details not provided

Mobile Number +91-7379105911

Email-ID yogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com

Citizenship Indian

* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No

RTI Application Details u/s 6(1) :-

((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )

* Description of Information Sought पुलिसकर्मियों के बीच मौजूद कुछ लोग आम लोगों और पुलिस की सक्षमता दोनों को नुकसान पहुंचाते हैं। यह पुलिस अधिकारियों का दायित्व है कि वे इसे तत्काल रोके जीवन के अधिकार और स्वतंत्रता को ऐसे अनौपचारिक तरीके से महत्वहीन नहीं किया जा सकता। - हाईकोर्ट

अदालत ने कहा, एफआईआर दर्ज होने के बाद ही किसी को नोटिस दे सकते हैं । बिना नोटिस दिए थाने पर नहीं बुला सकते: हाईकोर्ट 

लखनऊ, विधि संवाददाता हाईकोर्ट की लखनऊ बेंच ने एक महत्वपूर्ण आदेश में कहा है कि पुलिस किसी भी व्यक्ति को बिना लिखित नोटिस दिए थाने में नहीं बुला सकती न्यायालय ने राज्य सरकार को दिए आदेश में कहा है कि दंड प्रक्रिया संहिता के तहत ऐसी नोटिस एफआईआर दर्ज होने के बाद ही जारी की जाए। न्यायमूर्ति अरविंद मिश्रा प्रथम और न्यायमूर्ति मनीष माथुर की खंडपीठ ने यह भी कहा कि अधीनस्थ पुलिसकर्मी थाना इंचार्ज की अनुमति से ही ऐसा नोटिस जारी कर सकते हैं।

For more details, vide attached document to the RTI application. 

Article 21 of this part states that “No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to the procedure established by law”, and this is known as the Right to Life and Personal Liberty. Hence, this Article prohibits the encroachment upon a person’s right to life and personal liberty against the state. In the aforementioned order, two things are core issue.

1-An individual may be summoned at the police station through proper notice.2- This notice must be served after registering first information report. 3- High court and the Supreme Court are the court of records so their orders are binding on the government and the subordinate courts.

Public information officer may provide the following information to the information seeker point wise as far as follows.

1- Public information officer may provide the information about the steps taken by the government of Uttar Pradesh to comply with the direction of the Lucknow bench of the high court of Judicature at Allahabad. 

2- Please provide the government order, circular and office memo issued by the government to comply with the direction of the court.

3- Please provide the minutes proceedings carried out by the government to comply with the order of the court.

4- Please provide the name and designation of the Government staff and the department of the Government who are processing the order of the Lucknow bench of the high court of Judicature at Allahabad.

We appreciate the steps of the high court of Judicature at Allahabad and government of Uttar Pradesh must also clarify its stand in the matter as the matter concerns the wide public interest and the safeguard of human and constitutional rights of the people in the state.

Public information officer may provide the four point information within stipulated 30 days as prescribed under subsection 1 of section 7 of the right to information 2005.

* Concerned PIO Nodal Officer

Designation Details not provided.

Phone No Details not provided.

Email Id Details not provided.

Supporting document ((only pdf up to 1 MB))

Registration Number DOCMO/R/2023/61219
Name Yogi M P Singh
Date of Filing 15/09/2023
Status RTI REQUEST RECEIVED as on 15/09/2023
  Nodal Officer Details  
Name Sanjay Chaturvedi
Telephone Number 05222216455
Email-ID sanjay.10972@gov.in

Budaun police did not take any action in land grabbing concerning with senior citizen Vimal Kumar Rastogi only trying to deviate attention

Budaun police is not taking any action on the representation of senior citizen Vimal Kumar Rastogi against grabbers of land ipso facto

Grievance Status for registration number: GOVUP/E/2023/0059890

Grievance Concerns To

Name Of Complainant

Vimal Kumar Rastogi

Date of Receipt

10/09/2023

Received By Ministry/Department

Uttar Pradesh

Grievance Description

It is quite obvious from the report dated 5th September 2023 AAP the circle officer police district Budaun. If the case number 214/2022, Mrs Kiran Rastogi versus Vimal Kumar Rastogi and others is pending before the court of 4th additional civil judge junior division district Budaun in this matter, how can activities of grabbing of the land contact place by the opposite party who is the litigant in the case?

Here core issue is the grabbing up the land by the opposite party while he has filed several litigations before the various courts even in the matter concerned this implies that he has no faith in the decision of the court and he is trying to decide the case before the disposal of the case in the court of the law which is a mockery of the of law of land.

Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2023/0055685

Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant-Vimal Kumar Rastogi

Date of Receipt-22/08/2023, Received By Ministry/Department-Uttar Pradesh

Grievance Description

This representation may be considered as reminder of the following grievance which was submitted by the applicant to get registered the case against the opposition party who are trying to grab the land of the applicant by reaping the old age of the applicant.

Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2023/0053207

Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant-Vimal Kumar Rastogi Date of Receipt-12/08/2023

It is quite obvious that the opposite party is alleging Vindictiveness against the applicant and his family members. The applicant is suffering with several ailments so most part of the time is being spent in the Noida because facilities are not available at the Budaun district. Those individuals who do not have faith in the decision of the court taking the law of land in their own hands by grabbing the land which is sub judice in the court of law itself-proving the criminal approach of the opposite party in the matter.

With this representation of the applicant, the report attached by the Honourable Sir in the above grievance of 3 pages and rest of the 9 pages is the affidavit submitted by the applicant before the court of the law, has been attached by the applicant which must be taken into account by the accountable staff of the police district Budaun.

The evidence provided by the applicant concerning the grabbing of the land by the opposite party is based on the CC TV footage record which is authentic and true.

The opposite party made the deliberate attempt to violate the provisions of the law so action must be taken against him as the mistakes of the fact can be avoided but the mistakes of the law can never be avoided.

Consequently F.I.R. must be registered against the opposition party including main conspirator Dinesh Gupta S/O R.D. Gupta and Shipra Gupta W/O Dinesh Gupta under the following sections of the Indian Penal Code.

Section 441 (Criminal Trespass): When someone unlawfully enters a property, or lawfully enters a property but unlawfully remains there (such as a tenant after expiration of tenancy) with the intent to commit an offence, or to intimidate, insult or annoy the person in possession of such property, it amounts to criminal trespass.

Section 425 (Mischief): When someone intentionally or knowingly causes destruction of a property or any change in a property that diminishes its value or utility, they are said to commit “mischief”.

Section 420 (Cheating): This provision is applied when someone cheats and deceives you into delivering any property to someone else.

#Section 442 (House Trespass): This is a form of “criminal trespass” wherein the trespasser unlawfully enters a human dwelling, or any building used as a place of worship or as place for the custody of property.

Section 503 (Criminal Intimidation): Any threat of injury to person, reputation or property with the intent to cause them to do something which they are not legally bound to do is a form of criminal intimidation

Grievance Document

Current Status

Grievance received   

Date of Action

10/09/2023

Officer Concerns To

Forwarded to

Uttar Pradesh

Officer Name

Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary)

Organisation name

Uttar Pradesh

Contact Address

Chief Minister Secretariat , Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow

Email Address

bhaskar.12214@gov.in

Contact Number

05222226350 

Grievance Status for registration number: GOVUP/E/2023/0055685

Grievance Concerns To

Name Of Complainant

Vimal Kumar Rastogi

Date of Receipt

22/08/2023

Received By Ministry/Department

Uttar Pradesh

Grievance Description

This representation may be considered as reminder of the following grievance which was submitted by the applicant to get registered the case against the opposition party who are trying to grab the land of the applicant by reaping the old age of the applicant.

Grievance Status for registration number: GOVUP/E/2023/0053207

Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant-Vimal Kumar Rastogi Date of Receipt-12/08/2023 Received By Ministry/Department-Uttar Pradesh

Grievance Description-Today the applicant has made a call to the concerned sub inspector and made complaint in the matter in detail, but it is most unfortunate that sub inspector did not visit the site. There is little distance between the police chowki and the House of the applicant. Earlier sub inspector has made investigation in regard to the case registered and filed charge sheet under section 323, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

The matter concerning the working of the circle officer City district Budaun to direct his subordinates to take action in the matter as offender are trying to grab the land quite obvious from his cryptic and mysterious activities.

The applicant has attached the several photographs with the attached PDF documents to this grievance. Honourable sir may be pleased to take the perusal of the attached photographs to the grievance for the next action in the matter. It is most unfortunate that the police did not reach to the site of dispute which is a matter of great concern.

The opposition party may not be allowed to use my land and keep his own articles in the land of the applicant because after some time he will declare my land as his own land and will create new controversy so at the initial stage police may ask them to vacate the land as soon as possible and not to trespass in my land.

How can opposition party may be allowed to reap the benefits of vulnerability of the applicant which is quite obvious from the encroachment of the opposition party into the land of the applicant and the lackadaisical approach of the concerned police who could not reach to the site of dispute?

The mensrea of the opposition party is quite obvious from the fact that police have registered the case against them, yet they are taking the law of land in their own hand. The act itself does not make a man guilty unless he intends so and here intention is quite explicit from the fact that they are interested to grab the land of the applicant so first information report must be registered against them for the grabbing of the land of the applicant if they are not removing their articles from the land of the applicant.

Short submissions in the matter is as follows.

1-The applicant named Vimal Kumar Rastogi address- Garhaiya , Shahbajpur, Patiyali Sarai Pode 243601 State Uttar Pradesh is a senior citizen, and he is being constantly harassed by the habitual offenders.

2-It is noticeable that police have registered case under section 323, 504 and 506 of the Indian penal code against opposition party Dinesh Gupta S/O R.D. Gupta and Shipra Gupta W/O Dinesh Gupta in which charge sheet has been filed.

3-The applicant wants to inform the honourable Sir that the opposition party is habitual offender he has fabricated 6 frivolous cases in various courts including civil and revenue courts. Honourable Sir may be pleased to take a glance of the attached PDF documents to the grievance.

4-Honourable Sir it is the obligatory duty of the opposition party when they are seeking justice in the court of law by filing multiple suits then why they are grabbing the land by using cunning tricks and reaping the vulnerability of the applicant.

5-Consequently F.I.R. must be registered against the opposition party including main conspirator Dinesh Gupta S/O R.D. Gupta and Shipra Gupta W/O Dinesh Gupta under the following sections of the I.P.C. .

Section 441 (Criminal Trespass): When someone unlawfully enters a property, or lawfully enters a property but unlawfully remains there

Grievance Document

Current Status

Case closed   

Date of Action

07/09/2023

Remarks

आवेदक के शिकायती प्रार्थना पत्र के सम्बन्ध में आख्या अग्रसारित है श्रीमानजी आवेदक द्वारा प्रेषित किये गये शिकायती प्रार्थना पत्र की जांच कर आख्या संलग्न कर सादर सेवा में प्रेषित है

Reply Document

Rating

1

Poor

Rating Remarks

It is quite obvious from the report dated 5th September 2023 AAP the circle officer police district Budaun. If the case number 214/2022, Mrs Kiran Rastogi versus Vimal Kumar Rastogi and others is pending before the court of 4th additional civil judge junior division district Budaun in this matter, how can activities of grabbing of the land contact place by the opposite party who is the litigant in the case? Here core issue is the grabbing up the land by the opposite party while he has filed several litigations before the various courts even in the matter concerned this implies that he has no faith in the decision of the court and he is trying to decide the case before the disposal of the case in the court of the law which is a mockery of the of law of land. Consequently F.I.R. must be registered against the opposition party including main conspirator Dinesh Gupta S/O R.D. Gupta and Shipra Gupta W/O Dinesh Gupta under the following sections of the I.P.C. . like 441 Criminal Trespass

Appeal Details

Appeal Number

Date of Receipt

Appeal Text

Current Status

Officer Concerns To

Officer Name

Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary)

Organisation name

Government of Uttar Pradesh

Contact Address

Chief Minister Secretariat , Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow

Email Address

bhaskar.12214@gov.in

Contact Number

05222226350

To see the attached document to the grievance, click on the link