Showing posts with label C.O. City Budaun. Show all posts
Showing posts with label C.O. City Budaun. Show all posts

A.S.P. Rural/PIO in office of S.S.P. Budaun denied information to Smt. Radha Rastogi so latter made an appeal before FAA/SSP



 Registration Number SSPBD/R/2024/60013

Name Smt Radha Rastogi

Date of Filing 04/02/2024

Status REQUEST DISPOSED OF as on 22/02/2024

Reply :- आपकी सूचना ईमेल के माध्यम से दिनाँकः22.02.2024 को भेजी गयी ।

  Nodal Officer Details  

Name SPRA BDN

Telephone Number 9454401021

Email-ID rtidn@gmail.com

Your RTI Appeal filed successfully.

Please note down the details of registration.

Registration Number :SSPBD/A/2024/60008

Name :Smt Radha Rastogi

Date of Filing :18-03-2024

Request filed with :SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE OFFICE BUDAUN

 Contact Details  

Telephone Number :9454401021

Email-ID :rtidn@gmail.com

Online RTI Appeal Form Details

Public Authority Details :-

* Public Authority SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE OFFICE BUDAUN 

Personal Details:-

* Name Smt Radha Rastogi

Gender Male

* Address W/O Vimal Kumar Rastogi , Garhaiya Shahbajpur, Patiyali Sarai

Districts Budaun

Pincode 243601

State Uttar Pradesh

Educational Status Literate

Phone Number Details not provided

Mobile Number +91-9354762733

Email-ID vimalkrastogi1946[at]gmail[dot]com

Citizenship Indian

* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No

First Appeal Details u/s 19(1) :-

Registration Number SSPBD/A/2024/60008

Date of Filing 18/03/2024

Concerned Appellate Authority Nodal Officer

Phone No Details not provided

Email Id Details not provided

* Ground For Appeal Refused access to Information Requested

((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )

* Prayer or Relief Sought PIO denied the information sought by appellant under 6-points by taking the recourse of the subsection 1 d of section 8 of R.T.I. Act 2005. 

Registration Number SSPBD/R/2024/60013

Name Smt Radha Rastogi

Date of Filing 04/02/2024

Reply :- आपकी सूचना ईमेल के माध्यम से दिनाँकः 22.02.2024 को भेजी गयी 

According to subsection 1 d of section 8 of R.T.I. Act 2005, ) information including commercial confidence, trade secrets or intellectual property, the disclosure of which would harm the competitive position of a third party, unless the competent authority is satisfied that larger public interest warrants the disclosure of such information; 

Sought information by the appellant are as follows. 

1-Provide the posting details of sub inspector Anil Kumar Rana including date of joining in the district-Budaun as well as first posting details when he joined the service of the police with last posting details.

2-Provide the posting details of inspector of police station-Kotwali with name and designation including date of joining in the district-Budaun as well as first posting details when he joined the service of the police with last posting details.

3-Right to reason is an indispensable part of the sound administrative system therefore PIO may provide the reason for unsigned general diary details attached as page 2 of PDF document to this RTI application.

4-Please provide the name and designation of the executive magistrate before whom this unsigned general diary details was submitted by sub inspector Anil Kumar Rana and the executive magistrate accepted it.

5-Land under dispute is the registered land in the name of my husband Vimal Kumar Rastogi but police said in reports that it is a matter of partition. Please provide the reason for it.

6-In sub judice matters in which adjudication is pending before a competent court, how can police allow grabbing of land by offenders in the form of new construction ipso facto? Please provide the reason for not registering the F.I.R. after numerous representations of the husband of the information seeker. 

Ground of denial-Information is commercial confidence, trade secrets or intellectual property and disclosure of it harms third party. 

Here it is noticeable that sought information concerns working of the police which disclosure will increase transparency and accountability in the working of the police. Right to information Act 2005 was introduced by government to promote transparency and accountability in the working of the public authority. 

Whether police perform commercial activity or police performs trade or acts of police are intellectual property. At least PIO must take suggestion from S.S.P. before categorising working of police under commercial confidence, trade secrets or intellectual property.

FAA may direct PIO to provide 6-points information as aforementioned as concerned police are only concealing their corruption by withholding sought information through PIO. 

Supporting document ((only pdf up to 1 MB))

RTI Application Details u/s 6(1) :-

Registration Number SSPBD/R/2024/60013

Date of Filing 04/02/2024

PIO of Public Authority approached spra bdn

Designation spra

Phone No 9454401021

Email Id rtibdn@gmail.com

PIO Order/Decision Number Details not provided

* PIO Order/Decision Date

To see the attached document to the online RTI application, please click on the link

To fix accountability of inspector Kotwali and sub inspector Anil Kumar Rana, Radha Rastogi sought information from Budaun police




Registration Number SSPBD/R/2024/60013

Name Smt Radha Rastogi

Date of Filing 04/02/2024

Status RTI REQUEST RECEIVED as on 04/02/2024

  Nodal Officer Details  

Name SPRA BDN

Telephone Number 9454401021

Email-ID rtidn@gmail.com 

Online RTI Request Form Details

Public Authority Details :-   

* Public Authority SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE OFFICE BUDAUN 

Personal Details of RTI Applicant:-

Registration Number SSPBD/R/2024/60013

Date of Filing 04/02/2024

* Name Smt Radha Rastogi

Gender Male

* Address W/O Vimal Kumar Rastogi , Garhaiya Shahbajpur, Patiyali Sarai

Districts Budaun

Pincode 243601

State Uttar Pradesh

Educational Status Literate

Phone Number Details not provided

Mobile Number +91-9354762733

Email-ID vimalkrastogi1946[at]gmail[dot]com

Citizenship Indian

* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line? No

RTI Application Details u/s 6(1) :-

((Description of Information sought (up to 500 characters) )

* Description of Information Sought Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2024/0000969

Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant-Vimal Kumar Rastogi, Date of Receipt-04/01/2024, Received By Ministry/Department-Uttar Pradesh

To curb the misuse of section 151/107/116 of criminal procedure code, the government of Uttar Pradesh in order to comply with the direction of the High court of judicature at Allahabad issued the circular dated 09 September 2021 attached as Page 1 of the attached PDF document. Form the contents of the aforementioned circular, it was directed to entire accountable staff of the department of police that powers provided to police officer under section 151/107/116 of the criminal penal code is discretionary power of police must be used with due caution otherwise pecuniary penalty of Rs.25000 may be imposed on the police if found guilty of the abusing the tools.

How can there be apprehension of a breach of peace because my son who is employed in a company and workplace is Gautam Buddh Nagar Noida? It is quite obvious that police are wreaking vengeance with the applicant because the applicant is submitting a grievance as police are adopting lackadaisical approach to take action against the offenders.

Public information officer in the office of Senior Superintendent of police, district-Budaun must provide the following information to the information seeker point wise as follows.

1-Provide the posting details of sub inspector Anil Kumar Rana including date of joining in the district-Budaun as well as first posting details when he joined the service of the police with last posting details. 

2-Provide the posting details of inspector of police station-Kotwali with name and designation including date of joining in the district-Budaun as well as first posting details when he joined the service of the police with last posting details.

3-Right to reason is an indispensable part of the sound administrative system therefore PIO may provide the reason for unsigned general diary details attached as page 2 of PDF document to this RTI application. 

4-Please provide the name and designation of the executive magistrate before whom this unsigned general diary details was submitted by sub inspector Anil Kumar Rana and the executive magistrate accepted it. 

5-Land under dispute is the registered land in the name of my husband Vimal Kumar Rastogi but police said in reports that it is a matter of partition. Please provide the reason of it. 

6-In sub judice matter in which adjudication is pending before competent court, how can police allow grabbing of land by offenders in the form of new construction ipso facto? Please provide the reason of not registerig the F.I.R. after numerious representations of the husband of the information seeker. 

Public information officer must provide 6-point information to the information seeker within stipulated 30 days as prescribed under subsection 1 of section 7 of the right to information act 2005.

* Concerned PIO Nodal Officer

Designation Details not provided.

Phone No Details not provided.

Email Id Details not provided.

Supporting document ((only pdf up to 1 MB))

Grievance Status for registration number: GOVUP/E/2024/0000969

Grievance Concerns To

Name Of Complainant

Vimal Kumar Rastogi

Date of Receipt

04/01/2024

Received By Ministry/Department

Uttar Pradesh

Grievance Description

The matter concerns the working of the senior superintendent of police District-Budaun and the applicant who is a senior citizen draws the kind attention of the Honourable Sir to matters that needs urgent action.

There are two types of evidence of corruption 1-direct evidence and 2-circumstantial evidence. Undoubtedly there is no direct evidence of corruption of police in the matter but circumstantial evidence itself stating that police provided the full support to the land grabbers which is the root cause the applicant is alleging that there is no impeccable integrity of the concerned police personnel in the matter because of they have adopted lackadaisical and partial approach in dealing with the matter which is quite obvious from there irresponsible and illogical reports submitted by them in dozens of grievances of the applicant on the public grievance portal at the Government of India. Instead of taking action against the offenders under sections Section 441 (Criminal Trespass), Section 425 (Mischief), Section420 (Cheating), 442 (House Trespass), Section 503 (Criminal Intimidation) of the Indian Penal Code, you have misused section 151 107 and 116 of the criminal procedure code which are preventive measures applied against the spirit of circular issued by D.G.P. office in compliance guidelines issued by High court of judicature at Allahabad to prevent misuse of preventive measures and such dereliction will only promote anarchy in the society and promote land grabbers.

Police are justifying the land grabbing in the name partition awaited between the applicant and offenders but factual position is that offenders are grabbing the land which was purchased by the applicant on 19 July 1985 which means 38 years ago quite obvious from scan copy papers of registry executed by registrar Raj Bahadur Saxena between the applicant who is purchaser and Kanhai Lal Sarin S/O Raj Bahadur Sarin who is the seller of the land. Please take a glance of the last five pages of the attached PDF document to the grievance. The police submitted an arbitrary and inconsistent parrot report in the following grievance which is highly objectionable to the applicant. Concerned police may ask offenders to remove cars and other materials including construction work from the land of the applicant purchased from Kanhai Lal Sarin S/O Raj Bahadur Sarin whose measurement is 68 sq metres. The applicant has paid the price of the land and requisite fee to government for obtaining title of the land. How can partition claim of police in report be justified in the land of the applicant which is purchased land of the applicant. Grievance Status for registration number: GOVUP/E/2023/0083523, Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant-Vimal Kumar Rastogi, Date of Receipt-16/12/2023, Received By Ministry/Department-Uttar Pradesh

To curb the misuse of section 151/107/116 of criminal procedure code, the government of Uttar Pradesh in order to comply with the direction of the High court of judicature at Allahabad issued the circular dated 09 September 2021 attached as Page 1 of the attached PDF document. Form the contents of the aforementioned circular, it was directed to entire accountable staff of the department of police that powers provided to police officer under section 151/107/116 of the criminal penal code is discretionary power of police must be used with due caution otherwise pecuniary penalty of Rs.25000 may be imposed on the police if found guilty of the abusing the tools.

How can there be apprehension of a breach of peace because my son who is employed in a company and workplace is Gautam Buddh Nagar Noida? It is quite obvious that police are wreaking vengeance with the applicant because the applicant is submitting a grievance as police are adopting lackadaisical approach to take action against the offenders.

Grievance Document

Current Status

Case closed   

Date of Action

25/01/2024

Remarks

अधीनस्थ अधिकारी के स्तर पर निस्तारित श्रीमानजी आवेदक द्वारा दिये गये शिकायती प्रार्थना पत्र के सम्बन्ध में जाँच कर आख्या संलग्न है श्रीमान जी संलग्न शिकायती प्रार्थना पत्र के संबंध में जांच आख्या अवलोकनार्थ प्रेषित है

Reply Document

Rating

1

Poor

Rating Remarks

NotSatisfied

Appeal Details

Appeal Number

Date of Receipt

Appeal Text

Current Status

Officer Concerns To

Officer Name

Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary)

Organisation name

Government of Uttar Pradesh

Contact Address

Chief Minister Secretariat , Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow

Email Address

bhaskar.12214@gov.in

Contact Number

05222226350

To see the attached document to the online RTI application, please click on the link

Public information officer in the office of S.S.P. Budaun provided misleading information to senior citizen Vimal Kumar Rastogi


 Your RTI Appeal filed successfully.

Please note down the details of registration.

Registration Number: SSPBD/A/2024/60003

Name: Vimal Kumar Rastogi

Date of Filing :27-01-2024

Request filed with: SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE OFFICE BUDAUN

 Contact Details  

Telephone Number :9454401021

Email-ID:rtidn@gmail.com

Online RTI Appeal Form Details

Public Authority Details :-  

* Public Authority SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE OFFICE BUDAUN  

Personal Details:-

* Name Vimal Kumar Rastogi

Gender Male

* Address Garhaiya , Shahbajpur, Patiyali Sarai

Districts Budaun

Pincode 243601

State Uttar Pradesh

Educational Status Literate

Phone Number Details not provided

Mobile Number +91-9250727486

Email-ID vimalkrastogi1946[at]gmail[dot]com

Citizenship Indian

* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No

First Appeal Details u/s 19(1) :-

Registration Number SSPBD/A/2024/60003

Date of Filing 27/01/2024

Concerned Appellate Authority Nodal Officer

Phone No Details not provided

Email Id Details not provided

* Ground For Appeal Provided Incomplete, Misleading or False Information

((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )

* Prayer or Relief Sought 1-It is quite from the attached reports of the police that the information seeker submitted repeated representations before Budaun police, but police did not register a first information report in the matter of land grabbing by taking recourse that adjudication is pending in the court regarding the matter.

Please provide the canon law which allows the litigant to grab the land which adjudication is pending in the court of law.

Submission of the appellant- Under this point the public information officer is saying that adjudication concerning the partition and possession is pending in the competent court. This information is misleading because property grabbed by the offender is the purchased property of the applicant Vimal Kumar Rastogi from somebody else which is not the part of partition.

2-Please provide the order of the competent court which allowed Dinesh Kumar Gupta S/O Ram Bahadur Gupta to grab the land of the information seeker.

Submission of the appellant - This information is also misleading because the appellant is seeking order of the magistrate but you have provided the description of various cases to mislead the appellant instead of the order of the competent court.

3-Concerned police must provide the efforts made by it to remove the encroachment made by Dinesh Kumar Gupta S/O Ram Bahadur Gupta in the land of the information seeker.

Submission of the appellant- Whether the offenders had the order of the court to grab the land of the information seeker Vimal Kumar Rastogi. Moreover this land was registered in the name of the information seeker 35 years ago through the appropriate procedure before the registrar. Here police had to remove the encroachment because this encroachment by the offenders is illegal.

4-Kotwali police says that the information seeker and his family members are fugitive as told by few people even Kotwal said it publicly.

Please provide the court proceedings in detail to the information seeker which was not attended by the information seeker and his family members.

Submission of the appellant- For your kind information the appellant and his wife were present in the court of the District Judge already in the revision which was under consideration before the District Judge against the said matter. How can the appellant and his family members be fugitives? The kotwal maligned our image publicly and defamed us which is against the dignity of the police. .

5-Please provide the code of conduct for police which allows them to act like rumour mongers against senior citizens husband and wife who are living with his son because the protection could not be provided by the police even after repeated requests. Police ignore the offenses the offenders in the name of adjudication are pending which promoted the offenders creating danger to the security.

Submission of the appellant- the appellant is seeking the code of conduct for police which allows the police to act like rumour mongers which was not provided but they have misled the appellant that they are providing security to every senior citizen but the fact is that the appellant and his wife are living in Noida due to the security reasons.

Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))

RTI Application Details u/s 6(1) :-

Registration Number SSPBD/R/2023/60252

Date of Filing 07/12/2023

PIO of Public Authority approached spra bdn

Designation spra

Phone No 9454401021

Email Id rtibdn@gmail.com

PIO Order/Decision Number Details not provided

* PIO Order/Decision Date

Online RTI Appeal Form Details

Public Authority Details :-  

* Public Authority SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE OFFICE BUDAUN 

Personal Details:-

* Name Vimal Kumar Rastogi

Gender Male

* Address Garhaiya , Shahbajpur, Patiyali Sarai

Districts Budaun

Pincode 243601

State Uttar Pradesh

Educational Status Literate

Phone Number Details not provided

Mobile Number +91-9250727486

Email-ID vimalkrastogi1946[at]gmail[dot]com

Citizenship Indian

* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No

First Appeal Details u/s 19(1) :-

Registration Number SSPBD/A/2024/60003

Date of Filing 27/01/2024

Concerned Appellate Authority Nodal Officer

Phone No Details not provided.

Email Id Details not provided.

* Ground For Appeal Provided Incomplete, Misleading or False Information

((Description of Information sought (up to 500 characters)

* Prayer or Relief Sought 1-It is quite from the attached reports of the police that the information seeker submitted repeated representations before Budaun police, but police did not register a first information report in the matter of land grabbing by taking recourse that adjudication is pending in the court regarding the matter.

Please provide the canon law which allows the litigant to grab the land which adjudication is pending in the court of law.

Submission of the appellant- Under this point the public information officer is saying that adjudication concerning the partition and possession is pending in the competent court. This information is misleading because property grabbed by the offender is the purchased property of the applicant Vimal Kumar Rastogi from somebody else which is not the part of partition.

2-Please provide the order of the competent court which allowed Dinesh Kumar Gupta S/O Ram Bahadur Gupta to grab the land of the information seeker.

Submission of the appellant - This information is also misleading because the appellant is seeking order of the magistrate but you have provided the description of various cases to mislead the appellant instead of the order of the competent court.

3-Concerned police must provide the efforts made by it to remove the encroachment made by Dinesh Kumar Gupta S/O Ram Bahadur Gupta in the land of the information seeker.

Submission of the appellant- Whether the offenders had the order of the court to grab the land of the information seeker Vimal Kumar Rastogi. Moreover this land was registered in the name of the information seeker 35 years ago through the appropriate procedure before the registrar. Here police had to remove the encroachment because this encroachment by the offenders is illegal.

4-Kotwali police says that the information seeker and his family members are fugitive as told by few people even Kotwal said it publicly.

Please provide the court proceedings in detail to the information seeker which was not attended by the information seeker and his family members.

Submission of the appellant- For your kind information the appellant and his wife were present in the court of the District Judge already in the revision which was under consideration before the District Judge against the said matter. How can the appellant and his family members be fugitives? The kotwal maligned our image publicly and defamed us which is against the dignity of the police. .

5-Please provide the code of conduct for police which allows them to act like rumour mongers against senior citizens husband and wife who are living with his son because the protection could not be provided by the police even after repeated requests. Police ignore the offenses the offenders in the name of adjudication are pending which promoted the offenders creating danger to the security.

Submission of the appellant- the appellant is seeking the code of conduct for police which allows the police to act like rumour mongers which was not provided but they have misled the appellant that they are providing security to every senior citizen but the fact is that the appellant and his wife are living in Noida due to the security reasons.

Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))

RTI Application Details u/s 6(1) :-

Registration Number SSPBD/R/2023/60252

Date of Filing 07/12/2023

PIO of Public Authority approached spra bdn

Designation spra

Phone No 9454401021

Email Id rtibdn@gmail.com

PIO Order/Decision Number Details not provided

* PIO Order/Decision Date

Registration Number SSPBD/A/2024/60003

Name Vimal Kumar Rastogi

Date of Filing 27/01/2024

Status RTI APPEAL RECEIVED as on 27/01/2024

  Nodal Officer Details  

Name SPRA BDN

Telephone Number 9454401021

Email-ID rtidn@gmail.com

To see the reply of the public information officer, please click on the link

Budaun police calling grabbing of purchased land of Vimal Kumar Rastogi a dispute of partition of land and provided safe haven to offenders

Grievance Status for registration number: GOVUP/E/2023/0085879

Grievance Concerns To

Name Of Complainant

Vimal Kumar Rastogi

Date of Receipt

26/12/2023

Received By Ministry/Department

Uttar Pradesh

Grievance Description

To curb the misuse of section 151/107/116 of criminal procedure code, the government of Uttar Pradesh in order to comply with the direction of the High court of judicature at Allahabad issued the circular dated 09 September 2021 attached as Page 1 of the attached PDF document. Form the contents of the aforementioned circular, it was directed to entire accountable staff of the department of police that powers provided to police officer under section 151/107/116 of the criminal penal code is discretionary power of police must be used with due caution otherwise pecuniary penalty of Rs.25000 may be imposed on the police if found guilty of the abusing the tools. 

How can there be apprehension of a breach of peace because my son who is employed in a company and workplace is Gautam Buddh Nagar Noida? It is quite obvious that police are wreaking vengeance with the applicant because the applicant is submitting a grievance as police are adopting lackadaisical approach to take action against the offenders. 

Police are justifying the land grabbing in the name partition awaited between the applicant and offenders but factual position is that offenders are grabbing the land which was purchased by the applicant on 19 July 1985 which means 38 years ago quite obvious from scan copy papers of registry executed by registrar Raj Bahadur Saxena between the applicant who is purchaser and Kanhai Lal Sarin S/O Raj Bahadur Sarin who is the seller of the land. Please take a glance of the last five pages of the attached PDF document to the grievance. The police submitted an arbitrary and inconsistent parrot report in the following grievance which is highly objectionable to the applicant. Concerned police may ask offenders to remove cars and other materials including construction work from the land of the applicant purchased from Kanhai Lal Sarin S/O Raj Bahadur Sarin whose measurement is 68 sq metres.The applicant has paid the price of the land and requisite fee to government for obtaining title of the land. How can partition claim of police in report be justified in the land of the applicant which is purchased land of the applicant. Grievance Status for registration number: GOVUP/E/2023/0081796, Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant-Vimal Kumar Rastogi, Date of Receipt-09/12/2023, Received By Ministry/Department-Uttar Pradesh

Grievance Description-Concerned police submitted arbitrary and inconsistent reports in the following grievance and whatever report has been submitted by the police concerning the assault on the applicant by the offenders. It is noticeable that the current matter concerns the grabbing of the land which adjudication is pending before the court of the law which is self-obvious from the report of the police submitted in the earlier grievances and in this grievance also. The offenders are doing construction quite obvious from the attached photographs to the grievance so please act instead of overlooking the matter by submitting inconsistent and arbitrary reports in the matter.

Under Article 51 A of the constitution of India the applicant who is a senior citizen making following enquiries to the concerned investigation officer who is also the in charge of the Kotwali named Anil Kumar Rana. The applicant has full faith that he will not respond following queries properly as usual done by the concerned police.

1-It is quite from the attached reports of the police that the information seeker submitted repeated representations before Budaun police, but police did not register first information report in the matter of land grabbing by taking recourse that adjudication is pending in the court regarding the matter.

Please provide the canon law which allows the litigant to grab the land which adjudication is pending in the court of law.

2-Please provide the order of the competent court which allowed Dinesh Kumar Gupta S/O Ram Bahadur Gupta to grab the land of the information seeker.

Please remove encroachment otherwise register FIR.

Grievance Document

Current Status

Grievance received   

Date of Action

26/12/2023

Officer Concerns To

Forwarded to

Uttar Pradesh

Officer Name

Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary)

Organisation name

Uttar Pradesh

Contact Address

Chief Minister Secretariat , Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow

Email Address

bhaskar.12214@gov.in

Contact Number

05222226350

Reminder(s) / Clarification(s)

Reminder Date

Remarks

26/12/2023

3-Concerned police must provide the efforts made by it to remove the encroachment made by Dinesh Kumar Gupta S/O Ram Bahadur Gupta in the land of the information seeker.

4-Kotwali police says that the information seeker and his family members are fugitive as told by few people even Kotwal said it publicly.

Please provide the court proceedings in detail to the information seeker which was not attended by the information seeker and his family members.

5-Please provide the code of conduct for police which allows them to act like rumour mongers against senior citizens husband and wife who are living with his son because protection could not be provided by the police even after repeated requests. Police ignores the offenses the offenders in the name of adjudication are pending which promoted anarchy.

Grievance Status for registration number: GOVUP/E/2023/0081796

Grievance Concerns To

Name Of Complainant

Vimal Kumar Rastogi

Date of Receipt

09/12/2023

Received By Ministry/Department

Uttar Pradesh

Grievance Description

Concerned police submitted arbitrary and inconsistent report in the following grievance and whatever report has been submitted by the police concerning the assault on the applicant by the offenders. It is noticeable that the current matter concerns the grabbing of the land which adjudication is pending before the court of the law which is self-obvious from the report of the police submitted in the earlier grievances and in this grievance also. The offenders are doing construction quite obvious from the attached photographs to the grievance so please act instead of overlooking the matter by submitting inconsistent and arbitrary reports in the matter.

Grievance Status for registration number: GOVUP/E/2023/0075979, Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant- Vimal Kumar Rastogi, Date of Receipt-15/11/2023, Received By Ministry/Department-Uttar Pradesh

It is quite obvious that the applicant has attached the sequence of photographs of the construction and encroachment done by the offenders which must be considered by the concerned sub inspector and the Kotwal of the Kotwali under whose signature the partial report submitted on the public grievance portal by the police of the district Budaun. In this sequence of photographs there are 30 pictures which are showing, how the construction took place under the monitoring of the offenders? It is noticeable that video of the construction watch provided by the aggrieved applicant on the WhatsApp of the concerned sub inspector who was investigating the matter whose name is Anil Kumar Rana designation-sub inspector cum in-charge.

Budaun police is not registering F.I.R. of senior citizen in matter of land grabbing and overlooked repeated complaints of the applicant Vimal Kumar Rastogi.

Whether the pending adjudications in civil matters provide immunity to defenders from registering criminal cases against them. Whether such lackadaisical approach of the police in dealing with the criminal matters will not promote criminal activities in the society ipso facto police is overlooking the matter on the flimsy ground only promoting offenders. Here this question arises that why is the police is sympathetic to the offenders instead of senior citizen who is the victim in the crime committed by the offenders?

Under Article 51 A of the constitution of India the applicant who is a senior citizen making following enquiries to the concerned investigation officer who is also the in charge of the Kotwali named Anil Kumar Rana. The applicant has full faith that he will not respond following queries properly as usual done by the concerned police.

1-It is quite from the attached reports of the police that information seeker submitted repeated representations before Budaun police, but police did not register first information report in the matter of land grabbing by taking recourse that adjudication is pending in the court regarding the matter.

Please provide the canon law which allows the litigant to grab the land which adjudication is pending in the court of law.

2-Please provide the order of the competent court which allowed Dinesh Kumar Gupta S/O Ram Bahadur Gupta to grab the land of the information seeker.

3-Concerned police must provide the efforts made by it to remove the encroachment made by Dinesh Kumar Gupta S/O Ram Bahadur Gupta in the land of the information seeker.

4-Kotwali police says that the information seeker and his family members are fugitive as told by few people even Kotwal said it publicly.

Please provide the court proceedings in detail to the information seeker which was not attended by the information seeker and his family members.

5-Please provide the code of conduct for police which allows it to act like rumour mongers against senior citizens husband and wife who are living with his son because of the protection could not be provided by the police even after repeated requests. Police ignores the offenses the offenders in the name of adjudication are pending which promoted

Grievance Document

Current Status

Case closed   

Date of Action

22/12/2023

Remarks

श्रीमान जी प्रार्थना पत्र की जांच संलग्न है

Reply Document

Rating

1

Poor

Rating Remarks

NotSatisfied

Appeal Details

Appeal Number

Date of Receipt

Appeal Text

Current Status

Officer Concerns To

Officer Name

Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary)

Organisation name

Government of Uttar Pradesh

Contact Address

Chief Minister Secretariat , Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow

Email Address

bhaskar.12214@gov.in

Contact Number

05222226350

To see the attached document to the grievance, please click on the link

S.S.P. Budaun must provide the canon law which allows litigant to grab the land.

 



Grievance Status for registration number: GOVUP/E/2023/0083523

Grievance Concerns To

Name Of Complainant

Vimal Kumar Rastogi

Date of Receipt

16/12/2023

Received By Ministry/Department

Uttar Pradesh

Grievance Description

It is quite obvious that S.P. city district-Budaun, Uttar Pradesh Mr. Amit Kishore Srivastav in its report dated 7th September 2023 whatever report has been submitted same parrot report dated 11 December 2023 has been submitted in the following grievance with that report the applicant was not satisfied because that report was inconsistent and arbitrary and submitted by him without taking the perusal after contents of the grievance. For the more details, please take a glance at the attached PDF document to the grievance.

Grievance Status for registration number: GOVUP/E/2023/0077247, Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant-Vimal Kumar Rastogi, Date of Receipt-21/11/2023

Received By Ministry/Department-Uttar Pradesh

Which Canon law allows grabbing of the land by the litigant itself after filing litigation before the appropriate court and litigant is privileged and having immunity from the action of the police? Undoubtedly the matter is sub judice but the act of the opposite party is of criminal nature which must be taken into account by the concerned police under the appropriate section of the Indian Penal Code. Consequently F.I.R. must be registered against the opposition party

The matter concerns Budaun police, district-Budaun, Uttar Pradesh. Police is adopting a lackadaisical approach in the matter of land grabbing in which adjudication is pending before the court of law. Police are escaping from the matter on the flimsy ground which will promote the anti-social elements to keep on their illegal activities. There is no fear of police action in the offenders because of lackadaisical approach of police and partial cryptic reports of police on the Jansunwai portal.

Most respected Sir, how can police escape from the matter merely on the ground that the matter is of civil nature. If the police themselves accept that the matter is sub judice in various courts, then which competent court or magistrate provided them permission of construction and other activities in the land whose title is sub judice before the court? How to install a submersible pump in the land and grab it in a cryptic and mysterious way may be justified? Whether the act of the opposite party is not tantamount to house trespass and this land grabbing even when matter is pending before the court is not punishable under the various sections of the Indian Penal Code? Whether the opposite party is not superseding the court order because adjudication is pending before the various Court of Justice. Honourable Sir it is obligatory duty of the police to maintain the status quo of the impugned land but police have failed because of the partial approach in the matter.

In the report submitted by the Superintendent of police Budaun city it is quite obvious that in the concerned matter, the adjudication is pending before the court moreover this litigation has been submitted by the opposite party for seeking justice however opposite party itself having no regard for the adjudication awaited from the respected court of law.

The applicant is making inquiry under Article 51 A of the constitution of India to the senior Superintendent of police district-Budaun under whose supervision this anarchy is taking place.

1-It is quite from the attached reports of the police that information seeker submitted repeated representations before Budaun police, but police did not register first information report in the matter of land grabbing by taking recourse that adjudication is pending in the court regarding the matter.

Please provide the canon law which allows the litigant to grab the land which adjudication is pending in the court of law.

2-Please provide the order of the competent court which allowed Dinesh Kumar Gupta S/O Ram Bahadur Gupta to grab the land of the information seeker.

3-Concerned police must provide the efforts made by it to remove the encroachment made by Dinesh Kumar Gupta S/O Ram Bahadur Gupta in the land of the information seeker.

Grievance Document

Current Status

Grievance received   

Date of Action

16/12/2023

Officer Concerns To

Forwarded to

Uttar Pradesh

Officer Name

Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary)

Organisation name

Uttar Pradesh

Contact Address

Chief Minister Secretariat, Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow

Email Address

bhaskar.12214@gov.in

Contact Number

05222226350

To see the attached document to the grievance, please click on the link

Substantial evidence of construction was overlooked by in-charge sub-inspector Kotwali Budaun and submitted partial report



 Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2023/0081796

Grievance Concerns To
Name Of Complainant
Vimal Kumar Rastogi
Date of Receipt
09/12/2023
Received By Ministry/Department
Uttar Pradesh
Grievance Description
Concerned police submitted arbitrary and inconsistent report in the following grievance and whatever report has been submitted by the police concerning the assault on the applicant by the offenders. It is noticeable that the current matter concerns the grabbing of the land which adjudication is pending before the court of the law which is self-obvious from the report of the police submitted in the earlier grievances and in this grievance also. The offenders are doing construction quite obvious from the attached photographs to the grievance so please act instead of overlooking the matter by submitting inconsistent and arbitrary reports in the matter.
Grievance Status for registration number: GOVUP/E/2023/0075979, Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant- Vimal Kumar Rastogi, Date of Receipt-15/11/2023, Received By Ministry/Department-Uttar Pradesh
It is quite obvious that the applicant has attached the sequence of photographs of the construction and encroachment done by the offenders which must be considered by the concerned sub inspector and the Kotwal of the Kotwali under whose signature the partial report submitted on the public grievance portal by the police of the district Budaun. In this sequence of photographs there are 30 pictures which are showing, how the construction took place under the monitoring of the offenders? It is noticeable that video of the construction watch provided by the aggrieved applicant on the WhatsApp of the concerned sub inspector who was investigating the matter whose name is Anil Kumar Rana designation-sub inspector cum in-charge.
Budaun police is not registering F.I.R. of senior citizen in matter of land grabbing and overlooked repeated complaints of the applicant Vimal Kumar Rastogi.
Whether the pending adjudications in civil matters provide immunity to defenders from registering criminal cases against them. Whether such lackadaisical approach of the police in dealing with the criminal matters will not promote criminal activities in the society ipso facto police is overlooking the matter on the flimsy ground only promoting offenders. Here this question arises that why is the police is sympathetic to the offenders instead of senior citizen who is the victim in the crime committed by the offenders?
Under Article 51 A of the constitution of India the applicant who is a senior citizen making following enquiries to the concerned investigation officer who is also the in charge of the Kotwali named Anil Kumar Rana. The applicant has full faith that he will not respond following queries properly as usual done by the concerned police.
1-It is quite from the attached reports of the police that information seeker submitted repeated representations before Budaun police, but police did not register first information report in the matter of land grabbing by taking recourse that adjudication is pending in the court regarding the matter.
Please provide the canon law which allows the litigant to grab the land which adjudication is pending in the court of law.
2-Please provide the order of the competent court which allowed Dinesh Kumar Gupta S/O Ram Bahadur Gupta to grab the land of the information seeker.
3-Concerned police must provide the efforts made by it to remove the encroachment made by Dinesh Kumar Gupta S/O Ram Bahadur Gupta in the land of the information seeker.
4-Kotwali police says that the information seeker and his family members are fugitive as told by few people even Kotwal said it publicly.
Please provide the court proceedings in detail to the information seeker which was not attended by the information seeker and his family members.
5-Please provide the code of conduct for police which allows it to act like rumour mongers against senior citizens husband and wife who are living with his son because of the protection could not be provided by the police even after repeated requests. Police ignores the offenses the offenders in the name of adjudication are pending which promoted
Grievance Document
Current Status
Grievance received   
Date of Action
09/12/2023
Officer Concerns To
Forwarded to
Uttar Pradesh
Officer Name
Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary)
Organisation name
Uttar Pradesh
Contact Address
Chief Minister Secretariat , Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow
Email Address
bhaskar.12214@gov.in
Contact Number
05222226350

Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2023/0075979

Grievance Concerns To

Name Of Complainant

Vimal Kumar Rastogi

Date of Receipt

15/11/2023

Received By Ministry/Department

Uttar Pradesh

Grievance Description

Concerned police submitted arbitrary and inconsistent report in the following grievance and whatever report has been submitted by the police concerning the assault on the applicant by the offenders. It is noticeable that the current matter concerns the grabbing of the land which adjudication is pending before the court of the law which is self obvious from the report of the police submitted in the earlier grievances. The offenders are doing construction quite obvious from the attached photographs to the grievance so please take action instead of overlooking the matter by submitting inconsistent and arbitrary reports in the matter.

Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2023/0069827

Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant-Vimal Kumar Rastogi, Date of Receipt-19/10/2023

Received By Ministry/Department-Uttar Pradesh

Grievance Description-The matter concerns Budaun police, district-Budaun, Uttar Pradesh. Police is adopting a lackadaisical approach in the matter of land grabbing in which adjudication is pending before the court of law.

Police are escaping from the matter on the flimsy ground which will promote the anti-social elements to keep on their illegal activities.

Most respected Sir, how can police escape from the matter merely on the ground that the matter is of civil nature and police itself accept that the matter is sub judice in various courts. Which competent court or magistrate provided them permission in the land which is sub judice before the court to install a submersible pump and grab it in a cryptic and mysterious way? Whether the act of the opposite party is not tantamount to house trespass and this land grabbing even when matter is pending before the court is not punishable under the various sections of the Indian Penal Code? Whether the opposite party is not superseding the court order because adjudication is pending before the various Court of Justice. Honourable Sir it is obligatory duty of the police to maintain the status quo of the impugned land but police have failed because of the partial approach in the matter.

In the report submitted by the Superintendent of police Budaun city it is quite obvious that in the concerned matter adjudication is pending before the court moreover this litigation has been submitted by the opposite party for seeking justice however the opposite party itself having no regard for the adjudication awaited from the respected court of law.

Which Canon law allows grabbing of the land by the litigant itself after filing litigation before the appropriate court and the litigant is privileged and having immunity from the action of the police?

Undoubtedly the matter is sub judice but the act of the opposite party is of criminal nature which must be taken into account by the concerned police under the appropriate section of the Indian Penal Code.

Consequently F.I.R. must be registered against the opposition party including main conspirator Dinesh Gupta S/O R.D. Gupta and Shipra Gupta W/O Dinesh Gupta under the following sections of the Indian Penal Code.

Section 441 (Criminal Trespass): When someone unlawfully enters a property, or lawfully enters a property but unlawfully remains there (such as a tenant after expiration of tenancy) with the intent to commit an offence, or to intimidate, insult or annoy the person in possession of such property, it amounts to criminal trespass.

Section 425 (Mischief): When someone intentionally or knowingly causes destruction of a property or any change in a property that diminishes its value or utility, they are said to commit mischief.

Section 420 (Cheating): This provision is applied when someone cheats and deceives you into delivering any property to someone else.

Section 442 (House Trespass): This is a form of “criminal trespass” wherein the trespasser unlawfully enters a human dwelling, or any building used as a place of worship

Section 503 (Criminal Intimidation): Any threat of injury to person, reputation or property

Grievance Document

Current Status

Case closed   

Date of Action

09/12/2023

Remarks

अधीनस्थ अधिकारी के स्तर पर निस्तारित श्रीमान जी संलग्न शिकायती प्रार्थना पत्र के सम्बन्ध में जाँच आख्या अवलोकनार्थ सादर सेवा में प्रेषित है श्रीमान जी उक्त प्रकरण की जांच मुझ प्रभारी निरीक्षक मय उ0नि0 अनिल कुमार राणा के की गयी तो तो वाक्यात इस प्रकार पाये गये कि आवेदक नोयडा में अपने बेटे व पत्नी के साथ रहता है उनका कहना है कि जनपद बदायूं स्थित घर के सामने पडे प्लाट में विपक्षी द्वारा कब्जा करने का प्रयास करने के उद्देश्य से समरसेबल लगा लिया है तथा उक्त आवेदक मकान के सामने पडी जमीन पर निर्माण करने से रोका गया है और बिखरी पडी ईटो को अपने मकान के सामने रख लेना बताया और माननीय न्यायालय में परेशान करने की नियत से विभिन्न वाद आवेदक के खिलाफ दायर कर दिये है प्रकरण के सम्बन्ध में जांच से पाया कि आवेदक विमल कुमार व उसके सगे भाई स्व0 अशोक कुमार रस्तोगी के सामने खाली जगह है जिसे आवेदक अपनी बताता है और स्व0 अशोक कुमार रस्तोगी की पत्नी किरन रस्तोगी अपनी बताती है आवेदक के भाई स्व0 अशोक कुमार रस्तोगी के कोई पुत्र न होने के कारण उनकी पुत्री क्षिप्रा रस्तोगी अपने पति दिनेश कुमार गुप्ता पुत्र श्री आरबी गुप्ता के साथ अपने पिता के हिस्से के मकान में रहती है मकान के सामने पडी जगह को दोनो पक्ष अपनी अपनी बताते है पडी जगह का दोनो पक्षो के मध्य बटवारा नही हुआ है आवेदक अपने लडके के पास नोयडा में रहते है कभी कभी बदायूं आते है तथा विपक्षी क्षिप्रा रस्तोगी आपनी मां के साथ उक्त मकान में अपने पति के साथ रहती है जिसके दरवाजे के आगे दोनो पक्षो की खाली जमीन है जिसमे से आने जाने का रास्ता है विगत वर्ष उक्त खाली पडी जमीन में आवेदक व उसके परिजन द्वारा ईटे निर्माण कार्य हेतु मगायी जिस पर दोनो पक्षो में अपनी अपनी बताने को लेकर कहासुनी हुई और निर्माण नही हो पाया जिसके बटवारे के सम्बन्ध में श्रीमती किरन रस्तोगी ने वाद सं0 214.22 किरन रस्तोगी बनाम विमल रस्तोगी माननीय न्यायालय मे दायर किया जो विचाराधीन है उक्त पक्षो के मध्य सम्पत्ति के विवाद को लेकर विभिन्न न्यायालयो में वाद सं0 233.22 ,वाद सं0 1103.23 दिनेश गुप्ता बनाम विमल रस्तोगी ,190.23 विमल रस्तोगी बनाम दिनेश रस्तोगी ,134.22 किरन रस्तोगी बनाम राहुल रस्तोगी ,184.22 किरन रस्तोगी बनाम विमल रस्तोगी आदि भिन्न भिन्न न्यायालय में विचाराधीन होना ज्ञात हुए है उल

Reply Document

Rating

1

Poor

Rating Remarks

NotSatisfied

Appeal Details

Appeal Number

Date of Receipt

Appeal Text

Current Status

Officer Concerns To

Officer Name

Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary)

Organisation name

Government of Uttar Pradesh

Contact Address

Chief Minister Secretariat , Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow

Email Address

bhaskar.12214@gov.in

Contact Number

05222226350

To see the attached document to the grievance, please click on the link