L.D.A. set up committee in August 2021 to check corruption now it is Oct 2023, but teeth less committee failed to provide its report

Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2023/0064300

Grievance Concerns To

Name Of Complainant

Keshav Pratap Singh alias Tantrik K P Singh

Date of Receipt

28/09/2023

Received By Ministry/Department

Uttar Pradesh

Grievance Description

The matter concerns corruption of Lucknow Development Authority.

Status PARTIES SUMMONED FOR HEARING as on 17/07/2023 , 12:00 PM

OLD BUILDING, FIRST FLOUR, APAR SACHIV CAMP

This implies that Lucknow Development Authority can provide the 3 point information which have sought by the information seeker, to the information seeker. Please take a glance of the attached PDF documents to the grievance in which communication of the Public Information Officer Shraddha Choudhary is also included who did not provide the information by taking the recourse that committee has been set up by the Lucknow Development Authority to make enquiry into the matter.

An application under Article 51 A of the constitution of India on behalf of Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Angad Prasad Singh to make enquiry regarding the set up and findings of committee to look into irregularity in registration of plots and its allocation to beneficiaries. Report submitted by the Tehsildar Vivek Kumar Shukla on 31/05/2022 of L.D.A. is the same parrot report as submitted earlier by various staff of L.D.A. For more details, vide attached document to the grievance.

Undoubtedly the matter concerns the deep-rooted corruption and the concerned staff of the Lucknow development authority are procrastinating on the matter for many years and such reports are the integral part of their corrupt and mysterious dealings. Two years have passed till the formation of the committee to take action in the matter but still no action has been taken by the committee. Whether it is not procrastination and showing the ulterior design of the public authority. They themselves are accepting the fact that they have told repeatedly to the complainant that a committee has been formed and they are taking action in the matter but in this way they have passed many years whether it reflects the transparency and accountability in the working of the public authority Lucknow development authority? Whether it reflects the characteristic of an anti-corruption government as claimed by the accountable public functionaries of the Government of Uttar Pradesh?

Registration Number LKDPA/A/2021/60160

Name Dinesh Pratap Singh

Date of Filing 02/10/2021

Status PARTIES SUMMONED FOR HEARING as on 17/07/2023 , 12:00 PM

OLD BUILDING, FIRST FLOUR, APAR SACHIV CAMP

Nodal Officer Details

Name Rekha Doharey

Telephone Number 7081100326

Email-ID ldartionline@gmail.com

Registration Number LKDPA/R/2021/60285

Name Dinesh Pratap Singh

Date of Filing 04/08/2021

Status REQUEST DISPOSED OF as on 08/10/2021

This R.T.I. communique is submitted by Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Angad Prasad Singh who is the claimant of the plot of the land quite obvious from the order passed by the Lucknow bench of the High court of judicature at Allahabad in the Writ Petition Number 135 HC Year 2006. In the Writ Petition Number 135 HC Year 2006 filed in the Lucknow bench of the High court of Judicature at Allahabad filed by Anuradha Singh also named Guddi also named Aradhana Singh through her mother Beena Singh wife of Brijraj Singh also Beena Singh wife of Netrpal Singh. Whether in the same matter, to get remedy from various redressal bodies and get public aid by changing the name is not illegal?

In the aforementioned writ, Anuradha Singh was directed by the High court of judicature to seek civil remedy from competent authority by filing a title suit.

1-L.D.A. may provide the detail of title suit filed by multi-named lady Anuradha Singh in the record of L.D.A. Guddi Singh including the designation, name of the public staff who executed it with posting detail.

2-L.D.A. may provide the copy of the order passed by the competent court decided the title suit of the Anuradha Singh in the compliance of the High court order in the Writ Petition Number 135 HC Year 2006.

3-L.D.A. may provide the detail of the posting of the staffs executed the registry of plots to allottees with designation and name so that accountability may be fixed.

Grievance Document

Current Status

Case closed   

Date of Action

21/10/2023

Remarks

Please see the attachment

Rating

1

Poor

Rating Remarks

Is it not ridiculous that the concerned staff of the Chief Minister office is saying that a report is attached but the factual position is that no report is attached to the grievance on the public grievance portal of the Government of India? Can it be claimed that there is good governance in the state of Uttar Pradesh as claimed by our political Masters time and again during the election before the print and electronic media? Think about the gravity of the situation without attaching the report on the public grievance portal of the Government of India they redressed the grievance. The matter concerns deep-rooted corruption and they are running away from submitting the report on the public grievance portal, quite obvious from their cryptic approach in dealing with the matter. How will corruption be curbed in Uttar Pradesh if the matter concerning the corruption will be put under carpet in such a mysterious and cryptic way?

Appeal Details

Appeal Number

Date of Receipt

Appeal Text

Current Status

Officer Concerns To

Officer Name

Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary)

Organisation name

Government of Uttar Pradesh

Contact Address

Chief Minister Secretariat , Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow

Email Address

bhaskar.12214@gov.in

Contact Number

05222226350 

To see the attached document to the grievance, please click on the link

संदर्भ संख्या : 60000230195745 , दिनांक - 22 Oct 2023 तक की स्थिति

आवेदनकर्ता का विवरण :

शिकायत संख्या:-60000230195745

आवेदक का नाम-Keshav Pratap Singh alias Tantrik K P Singhविषय-The matter concerns corruption of Lucknow Development Authority. Status PARTIES SUMMONED FOR HEARING as on 17/07/2023 , 12:00 PM OLD BUILDING, FIRST FLOUR, APAR SACHIV CAMP This implies that Lucknow Development Authority can provide the 3 point information which have sought by the information seeker, to the information seeker. Please take a glance of the attached PDF documents to the grievance in which communication of the Public Information Officer Shraddha Choudhary is also included who did not provide the information by taking the recourse that committee has been set up by the Lucknow Development Authority to make enquiry into the matter. An application under Article 51 A of the constitution of India on behalf of Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Angad Prasad Singh to make enquiry regarding the set up and findings of committee to look into irregularity in registration of plots and its allocation to beneficiaries. Report submitted by the Tehsildar Vivek Kumar Shukla on 31/05/2022 of L.D.A. is the same parrot report as submitted earlier by various staff of L.D.A. For more details, vide attached document to the grievance. Undoubtedly the matter concerns the deep-rooted corruption and the concerned staff of the Lucknow development authority are procrastinating on the matter for many years and such reports are the integral part of their corrupt and mysterious dealings. Two years have passed till the formation of the committee to take action in the matter but still no action has been taken by the committee. Whether it is not procrastination and showing the ulterior design of the public authority. They themselves are accepting the fact that they have told repeatedly to the complainant that a committee has been formed and they are taking action in the matter but in this way they have passed many years whether it reflects the transparency and accountability in the working of the public authority Lucknow development authority? Whether it reflects the characteristic of an anti-corruption government as claimed by the accountable public functionaries of the Government of Uttar Pradesh? Registration Number LKDPA/A/2021/60160 Name Dinesh Pratap Singh Date of Filing 02/10/2021 Status PARTIES SUMMONED FOR HEARING as on 17/07/2023 , 12:00 PM OLD BUILDING, FIRST FLOUR, APAR SACHIV CAMP Nodal Officer Details Name Rekha Doharey Telephone Number 7081100326 Email-ID ldartionline@gmail.com Registration Number LKDPA/R/2021/60285 Name Dinesh Pratap Singh Date of Filing 04/08/2021 Status REQUEST DISPOSED OF as on 08/10/2021 This R.T.I. communique is submitted by Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Angad Prasad Singh who is the claimant of the plot of the land quite obvious from the order passed by the Lucknow bench of the High court of judicature at Allahabad in the Writ Petition Number 135 HC Year 2006. In the Writ Petition Number 135 HC Year 2006 filed in the Lucknow bench of the High court of Judicature at Allahabad filed by Anuradha Singh also named Guddi also named Aradhana Singh through her mother Beena Singh wife of Brijraj Singh also Beena Singh wife of Netrpal Singh. Whether in the same matter, to get remedy from various redressal bodies and get public aid by changing the name is not illegal? In the aforementioned writ, Anuradha Singh was directed by the High court of judicature to seek civil remedy from competent authority by filing a title suit. 1-L.D.A. may provide the detail of title suit filed by multi-named lady Anuradha Singh in the record of L.D.A. Guddi Singh including the designation, name of the public staff who executed it with posting detail. 2-L.D.A. may provide the copy of the order passed by the competent court decided the title suit of the Anuradha Singh in the compliance of the High court order in the Writ Petition Number 135 HC Year 2006. 3-L.D.A. may provide the detail of the posting of the staffs executed the registry of plots to allottees with designation and name so that accountability may be fixed.

विभाग -विकास प्राधिकरणशिकायत श्रेणी -

नियोजित तारीख-21-10-2023शिकायत की स्थिति-

स्तर -विकास प्राधिकरणपद -उपाध्यक्ष

प्राप्त रिमाइंडर-

प्राप्त फीडबैक -दिनांक को फीडबैक:-

फीडबैक की स्थिति -

संलग्नक देखें -Click here

नोट- अंतिम कॉलम में वर्णित सन्दर्भ की स्थिति कॉलम-5 में अंकित अधिकारी के स्तर पर हुयी कार्यवाही दर्शाता है!

अधीनस्थ द्वारा प्राप्त आख्या :

क्र.स. सन्दर्भ का प्रकार आदेश देने वाले अधिकारी अग्रसारित दिनांक आदेश आख्या देने वाले अधिकारी आख्या दिनांक आख्या स्थिति आपत्ति देखे संलगनक

1 अंतरित लोक शिकायत अनुभाग -3(, मुख्यमंत्री कार्यालय ) 06-10-2023 कृपया शीघ्र नियमानुसार कार्यवाही किये जाने की अपेक्षा की गई है। उपाध्यक्ष -विकास प्राधिकरण 21-10-2023 Please see the attachment

विवरण हेतु क्लिक करें... निस्तारित

Beerbhadra Singh

To write blogs and applications for the deprived sections who can not raise their voices to stop their human rights violations by corrupt bureaucrats and executives.

Post a Comment

Whatever comments you make, it is your responsibility to use facts. You may not make unwanted imputations against any body which may be baseless otherwise commentator itself will be responsible for the derogatory remarks made against any body proved to be false at any appropriate forum.

Previous Post Next Post