Mahesh Pratap Singh Yogi M P Singh <yogimpsingh@gmail.com> |
PMOPG :: Online Grievance Registration 1 message |
Registration Number DOCMO/A/2022/60173 Name Yogi M P Singh Date of Filing 09/08/2022 Status APPEAL DISPOSED OF as on 26/08/2022
Reply :- आपको पूर्व में सूचना उपलब्ध करा दिया गया है। अत: आपका आनलाइन अपीलीय पत्र निस्तारित किया जाता है
Registration Number DOCMO/A/2022/60180 Name Yogi M P Singh Date of Filing 24/08/2022 Status APPEAL DISPOSED OF as on 26/08/2022
Reply :- आपको पूर्व में सूचना उपलब्ध करा दिया गया है। अत: आपका आनलाइन अपीलीय पत्र निस्तारित किया जाता है
PIO of Public Authority approached ARVIND MOHAN (L.S. Sec-5) Designation UNDER SECRETARY Phone No 9454412574
Email Id arvind.12574@gov.in
Concerned Appellate Authority ARVIND MOHAN Phone No 9454412574 Email Id arvind.12574@gov.in
Subsection 1 of section 19 of Right to Information Act 2005 states as follows.
Any person who, does not receive a decision within the time specified in sub section (1) or clause (a) of sub-section (3) of section 7, or is aggrieved by a decision of the
Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be,
may within thirty days from the expiry of such period or from the receipt of such a decision
prefer an appeal to such officer who is senior in rank to the Central Public Information
Officer or State Public Information Officer as the case may be, in each public authority:
Provided that such officer may admit the appeal after the expiry of the period of thirty
days if he or she is satisfied that the appellant was prevented by sufficient cause from filing
the appeal in time.
Here it is quite explicit that the First Appellate Authority must be a senior rank officer of public information officer but here ARVIND MOHAN (L.S. Sec-5) Designation UNDER SECRETARY is the both PIO and FAA which is contrary to explicit provision of Right to Information Act 2005.
Continuation of the aforementioned officer at the post of First Appellate Authority is the signal of the lawlessness and anarchy in the working of the office of chief minister government of Uttar Pradesh.
Nomination of the Arvind Mohan as the First Appellate Authority implies no remedy available against the arbitrary decisions of the public information officer.
If the efficient officers are available, then why is a man of doubtful integrity being promoted by the office of chief minister of Uttar Pradesh?
Corruption is proved in two ways.
1-Through direct evidences. 2-Circumstantial evidence. Here ample circumstantial evidence questions the integrity of the aforementioned officer reaping benefits of various key posts.
Tags:
Transparency
If the efficient officers are available, then why is a man of doubtful integrity being promoted by the office of chief minister of Uttar Pradesh?
ReplyDeleteCorruption is proved in two ways.
1-Through direct evidences. 2-Circumstantial evidence. Here ample circumstantial evidence questions the integrity of the aforementioned officer reaping benefits of various key posts.
मुख्यमंत्री कार्यालय की कार्यशैली अवैध है क्योंकि जन सूचना अधिकार 2005 के तहत वरिष्ठ अधिकारी जो कि जन सूचना अधिकारी से वरिष्ठ हो उसी को प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी नामित किया जा सकता है और यहां पर जो कुछ भी किया गया वह तो पूर्ण रूप से भ्रष्टाचार पूर्ण भी है क्योंकि जो व्यक्ति जन सूचना अधिकारी है वही अपीलीय अधिकारी भी है अरविंद मोहन उप सचिव मुख्यमंत्री कार्यालय जन सूचना अधिकारी के साथ-साथ प्रथम अपीलीय अधिकारी भी है अर्थात वे अपने खिलाफ अपील सुनेंगे अर्थात उनकी कार्यशैली कितनी अच्छी होगी तो आप अंदाजा लगा सकते
ReplyDelete