CPIO in district court Budaun denied sought information by quoting it opinion consequently senior citizen was again denied information


 Registration Number DNBDU/R/2023/60004

Name Vimal Kumar Rastogi

Date of Filing 23/10/2023

Status REQUEST REJECTED as on 06/11/2023

Reason for Rejection :- Others.

Remarks:- According to Rule4 of Allahabd High Court(right to information)rule 2006.

  Nodal Officer Details  

Name District Court Budaun

Telephone Number 6395555051

Email-ID sunitchandrajudge@gmail.com

Online RTI Request Form Details

Public Authority Details :-   

* Public Authority District Court Budaun  

Personal Details of RTI Applicant:-

Registration Number DNBDU/R/2023/60004

Date of Filing 23/10/2023

* Name Vimal Kumar Rastogi

Gender Male

* Address Garhaiya , Shahbajpur, Patiyali Sarai

Pincode 243601

State Uttar Pradesh

Educational Status Literate

Phone Number Details not provided

Mobile Number +91-9250727486

Email-ID vimalkrastogi1946[at]gmail[dot]com

Citizenship Indian

* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No

RTI Application Details u/s 6(1) :-

((Description of Information sought (up to 500 characters) )

* Description of Information Sought As per Section 397 of Cr.P.C, the High Court or any Sessions Judge have been empowered to call for and examine the records of any proceeding satisfy oneself: as to the correctness, legality, or propriety of any finding, sentence or order, whether recorded or passed, and as to the regularity of any proceedings of an inferior court. Moreover, they have the power to direct the execution of any sentence or an order to be suspended. Not just this, but to even direct to release the accused on bail or on his own bond if the accused is in confinement. They may even order an inquiry subject to certain limitations. It is clearly evident that the appellant courts have been granted such powers so as to obviate any failure of justice. The information seeker is a 77 years old senior citizen whose health is not well enough to travel long distances. Following case Institute against my wife, son and me itself. Daily Status Chief Judicial Magistrate In the court of :IV ACJJD/AJM CNR Number :UPBN040023182023 Case Number :Warrant or Summons Criminal Case/0001103/2023 DINESH KUMAR GUPTA versus VIMAL KUMAR RASTOGI, Date : 16-10-2023, next date of hearing has been fixed on 7th November 2023. The applicant filed the criminal revision which details are as follows. Daily Status District and Session Judge In the court of :DISTRICT JUDGE, BUDAUN CNR Number :UPBN010083962023 Case Number :Criminal Revision/0000190/2023 VIMAL KUMAR RASTOGI versus State of UP, Date : 11-10-2023 The next date of hearing has been fixed by district judge 27th October 2023. It is noticeable that despite the objection of my advocate learned judge/:IV ACJJD/AJM issued warrant against the information seeker and his family members. The learned Council for the applicant told the Honourable magistrate Court that revision application of the applicant has been admitted by the Honourable Court of the district judge but it was overlocked by the trial court. Moreover, the applicant and his wife appeared in person before the court of Honourable district judge it was told to the learned magistrate but he/she did not pay heed. Central Public Information Officer may provide the information to the information seeker if the parallel proceeding of the subordinate Court will continue how the miscarriage of justice will be curbed. Please provide information at the earliest or within stipulated 30 days as prescribed under subsection 1 of section 7 of Right to Information Act 2005.

* Concerned PIO SUNIT CHANDRA

Designation ADDITIONAL AND SESSION JUDGE COURT NO 1

Phone No 05832267223

Email Id sunitchandrajudge@gmail.com

Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))

To see the attached document to the RTI application, please click on the link

Beerbhadra Singh

To write blogs and applications for the deprived sections who can not raise their voices to stop their human rights violations by corrupt bureaucrats and executives.

Post a Comment

Whatever comments you make, it is your responsibility to use facts. You may not make unwanted imputations against any body which may be baseless otherwise commentator itself will be responsible for the derogatory remarks made against any body proved to be false at any appropriate forum.

Previous Post Next Post