Here my PAN Card is connected to Aadhar, Aadhar connected to mobile number which implies that these transactions made by me

 Here findings are 1-Mobile number belongs to complainant.

2-Account holder is different which means beneficiary is different. 

But streams of notices of the department will be served to applicant cum complainant. 

If any irregularity is found, complainant will be dragged because of mobile number prima facie. 

Income tax serve the notice on the ground of incomplete information seeking clarification from innocent and gullible people having zero knowledge regarding factual position. 

Dear complainant, 

Subject: CPGRAMS grievance reg. No. CBODT/E/2021/17947 

The aforementioned grievance was lodged for issues pertaining to - 

I. Receipt of an SMS on the complainant's mobile number from CMPOC, SBI, Hyderabad The response provided by SBI for this issue is as follows1. “The referred transactions pertain to Salary payment instructions uploaded by Controller of Defence Accounts Jabalpur [Unit: Pay Accounts Office (ORs), Jammu and Kashmir] under Ministry of Defence and the payments were processed for credit to Account No. xxxxxxxx233 (IFSC: Sxxxxxxxxx8). 

2. The mobile number provided by the CDA Jabalpur unit in the referred Payment instructions match with that mentioned in the complaint. However, the name of the Account Holder does not match with the name of the complainant. 

3. As per the arrangement, CMPOC systems triger SMS to the beneficiry/vendor Mobile Number as given in the uploaded payment instructions intimating them of processing of the transactions uploaded by the CDAs. We advise that there is no mechanism at our end to check the correctness of mobile numbers as given in the payment instructions. 

4. We have alerted CDA Jabalpur to verify the mobile number of the beneficiary and arrange for correction, if necessary. 

Therefore, you are requested to pursue the matter with SBI, in case you are not satisfied with the response. 

II. Receipt of an SMS on the complainant's mobile number pertaining to ecampaign for high value financial transactions for F.Y. 2019-20 

The response to the aforementioned issue is as follows

Under High Value transaction campaign, information received by Income tax department on your PAN from different sources has been shown to you for validation of information. In respect of the information received in your case, you are requested to note that the campaign is a part of the voluntary compliance management framework of the department for promoting voluntary compliance by the taxpayers and for enabling the taxpayers in taking necessary steps towards filling any potential compliance gaps if it exists. It is with this purpose that the information has been made available to you and response has been solicited in respect of the correctness and completeness of the information. 

With respect to the query raised, please note that information available on your PAN is shown for response on compliance portal and appropriate options have been made available in order to enable you to furnish response on the correctness and completeness of information. You may select options applicable to you among the following options on Compliance Portal: 

• Information is correct 

• Information is not fully correct 

• Information related to other Person/ Year 

• Information is duplicate/ included in other displayed information 

• Information is denied. 

Please note that response can be submitted online on Compliance Portal only. Further, feedback given by taxpayer is utilized during data analytics and processing of information for further proceedings under the Income tax Act. 

Your suggestions in respect of authentication of data is valuable to us and constant endeavors are being made to make the process more taxpayer friendly. Your cooperation in submitting response is highly valued by the department. 

For further assistance, Campaign User Guide and FAQs are available under the “Resources” menu on Compliance Portal. You can also call at the Toll-free number 1800 103 4215 between 9.30 a.m. – 6.00 p.m. on working days or click on the ‘Help’ icon on the Compliance portal to get support/call back.


Grievance Status for registration number : CBODT/E/2021/17947

Grievance Concerns To

Name Of Complainant

Yogi M. P. Singh

Date of Receipt

04/07/2021

Received By Ministry/Department

Central Board of Direct Taxes (Income Tax)

Grievance Description

Fraud accounts are opened and anonymous mobile numbers are registered with them and then hefty sum of money is transacted and notice of income tax is served to mobile number holders.

The matter is also sent to PMO

Dear Sir/Madam,

Your Communication has been registered with registration number: PMOPG/E/2021/0428938.

Following message came on my mobile No. 9794760348 initially service provider was Airtel now ported to B.S.N.L.


Name:

Number: BP-SBI CMP

Content:

Txn with Ref No. 600155367144 for Rs. 109147.00 in A/c XXX0233 received from CDA JABALPUR is taken up for Processing on 30-06-2021. SBI


Sender- BP-SBICMP

Sent-Time: 30 June 2021 7:53:43 AM


Modi Sir both State Bank of India and Department of Income Tax of India both come under the supervisory control of your office.


Modi Sir everyone knows that there is a manifold increase in corruption compared to earlier governments and these public authorities, governed by your office through the subordinate ministry i.e. ministry of finance.


Modi Sir undoubtedly you are honest because two parliamentary elections have proved it. Aggressive assault on the opposition during the last election campaign on the issue of corruption remained exemplary and set up a precedent.


Sir, this account A/c XXX0233 does not belong to me and also does not belong to my family member.


Again Sir, as far as the aforementioned transaction is concerned and earlier transactions like the following not done by the applicant.


Txn with Ref No. 600122810590 for Rs. 52372.00 in A/c XXX0233 received from CDA JABALPUR is taken up for Processing on 30-04-20. SBI,CMP,HYD.

Time: 4/30/2020 3:46:15 PM


Sir if I have not done this transaction and aforementioned earlier similar transactions, then why the messages were sent on my Mobile number-9794760348.


Sir, whether these dealings are not illegal?


On the grounds of such bogus transactions, later on, your department of income tax targets an anti-corruption crusader whose family is on the verge of hunger.


How can it be justified that those drawing a huge salary from the public exchequer but not satisfied and indulge in the deep-rooted corruption? If an anti-corruption crusader raises fingers against them for the betterment of society, then he is targeted in such a cunning planned way?


Why were Ram and Akbar great kings? Because both used to know the troubles of the people in a disguised way but here everything knows but doing acting of not knowing.


This is a humble request of your applicant to you Hon’ble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness and chaos arbitrarily by making the mockery of law of land? There is need of the hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer to win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your applicant shall ever pray to you, Hon’ble Sir.



Date-04/07/2021 Yours sincerely


Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911, Mohalla- Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code-231001.

Grievance Document

Current Status

Case closed   

Date of Action

27/08/2021

Remarks

The response to the grievance in concern is attached herewith and the complainant is requested to refer to the same.. Therefore, the grievance may be treated as settled.

Reply Document

Rating

1

Poor

Rating Remarks

The mobile number provided by the CDA Jabalpur unit in the referred Payment instructions match with that mentioned in the complaint. However, the name of the Account Holder does not match with the name of the complainant. Which means lacunae found on the part of State Bank of India but such thing causes trouble to the mobile holder ipso facto from the report of the concerned mandate. Such mismanagement and negligence on the part of S.B.I. causing troublesome to the innocent and gullible people which must be curbed in the wide public interest. Here findings are only saying that subsequent result is nil because such negligence undoubtdly creating loophole for wrongdoers taken negligently by the concerned mandate.

Officer Concerns To

Officer Name

Ananthagiri VLN Mahesh

Officer Designation

ADIT Systems-2-3-2

Contact Address

Email Address

ananthagiri.mahesh@incometax.gov.in

Contact Number

01202770057

Yogi

An anti-corruption crusader. Motive to build a strong society based on the principle of universal brotherhood. Human rights defender and RTI activist. Working for the betterment of societies and as an anti-corruption crusader for more than 25 years. Our sole motive is to raise the voices of weaker and downtrodden sections of the society and safeguard their human rights. Our motive is to promote the religion of universal brotherhood among the various castes communities of different religions. Man is great by his deeds and character.

1 Comments

Whatever comments you make, it is your responsibility to use facts. You may not make unwanted imputations against any body which may be baseless otherwise commentator itself will be responsible for the derogatory remarks made against any body proved to be false at any appropriate forum.

  1. Here findings are 1-Mobile number belongs to complainant.

    2-Account holder is different which means beneficiary is different.

    But streams of notices of the department will be served to applicant cum complainant.

    If any irregularity is found, complainant will be dragged because of mobile number prima facie.

    Income tax serves the notice on the ground of incomplete information seeking clarification from innocent and gullible people having zero knowledge regarding factual position.

    ReplyDelete
Previous Post Next Post