Your RTI Appeal filed successfully.
Please note down the details of registration.
Registration Number :PCGBN/A/2024/60024
Name :Yogi M P Singh
Date of Filing :16-02-2024
Request filed with :POLICE COMMISSIONER OFFICE GAUTAM BUDDA NAGAR
Contact Details
Telephone Number :8595902504
Email-ID :adcp-polhq.gb@up.gov.in
Online RTI Appeal Form Details
Public Authority Details :-
* Public Authority POLICE COMMISSIONER OFFICE GAUTAM BUDDA NAGAR
Personal Details:-
* Name Yogi M P Singh
Gender Male
* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road, Sangmohal post office
Districts Mirzapur
Pincode 231001
State Uttar Pradesh
Educational Status Literate
Phone Number Details not provided
Mobile Number +91-7379105911
Email-ID yogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
Citizenship Indian
* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No
First Appeal Details u/s 19(1) :-
Registration Number PCGBN/A/2024/60024
Date of Filing 16/02/2024
Concerned Appellate Authority Nodal Officer
Phone No Details not provided
Email Id Details not provided
* Ground For Appeal Refused access to Information Requested
((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )
* Prayer or Relief Sought A-20240200203 Yogi M P Singh Public Information Officer Office - POLICE COMMISSIONERATE GAUTAMBUDHNAGAR 12/02/2024
To Chief Information Commissioner/ Companion Information Commissioners 7/7A, RTI Bhawan, Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, PIN Code-226010
Details of the appellant-Mohalla Surekapuram colony, Jabalpur Road, Sangmohal post office, Districts Mirzapur, Pin code 231001, State-Uttar Pradesh, Mobile number 7379105911
Details of the respondents-
1-PIO of Public Authority approached-Shakti Mohan Awasthi Designation-Ad. Deputy Commissioner of Police.Mobile No 8595902511 Email Id adcpnoidagbn@gmail.com, District-Gautam Buddha Nagar, Pin Code-203202
2-Concerned Appellate Authority- Harishchandra, Mobile No 8595902505, Email Id dcp-polnoida.gb@up.gov.in District-Gautam Buddha Nagar, Pin Code-203202
Prayer- Public information officer denied information by taking recourse of subsection 1 (h)Section 8 of the right to information act 2005 while the sought information does not concern the investigation.
Short submissions of the appellant are as follows.
1- It is submitted before the Honourable Sir that the matter concerns the corruption which must be investigated in transparent and accountable way in time bound manner. Section 173 in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 173. Report of police officer on completion of investigation. (1) Every investigation under this Chapter shall be completed without unnecessary delay. As soon as it is completed, the officer in charge of the police station shall forward to a Magistrate empowered to take cognizance of the offence on a police report.
2-It is submitted before the Honourable Sir that subsection 1 (h)Section 8 of the right to information act 2005 categorically states that information which would impede the process of investigation or apprehension, or prosecution of offenders is exempted from disclosure under right to information act 2005.
3-This is a humble request of the appellant to the most respected member of the Information Commission that he must take the perusal of the first and second page of the attached pdf document to this appeal which is the denial of information by the concerned police officer.
4-It is quite obvious that more than eight months have passed in the matter and the concerned investigation officer of the police is still withholding the information in the name of continuation of investigation in the matter which means if he provides the information it will impede the process of Investigation.
5-Whether the concerned investigation officer could not submit chargesheet in the concerned competent court which was to be submitted by him as soon as it is completed according to subsection one half section 171 of the code of criminal procedure 1973.
6-Right to information at 2005 was introduced by the government of India to promote transparency and accountability in the working.
Supporting document ((only pdf up to 1 MB)) Supporting document not provided
RTI Application Details u/s 6(1) :-
Registration Number PCGBN/R/2024/60042
Date of Filing 17/01/2024
PIO of Public Authority approached Shakti Mohan Awasthi
Designation Ad. Deputy Commissioner of Police
Phone No 8595902511
Email Id adcpnoidagbn@gmail.com
PIO Order/Decision Number Details not provided
* PIO Order/Decision Date
Registration Number PCGBN/A/2024/60024
Name Yogi M P Singh
Date of Filing 16/02/2024
Status RTI APPEAL RECEIVED as on 16/02/2024
Nodal Officer Details
Name VISHAL PANDAY
Telephone Number 8595902504
Email-ID adcp-polhq.gb@up.gov.in
Because of rampant corruption in the working of the public staff they do not like the right to information act 2005 because it promotes the transparency and accountability in the working of the government staff.
ReplyDeleteThink about the good governance of yogi and Modi where orders of the constitutional functionaries are not followed by the bureaucrats. Think about the poor corruption perception index of the transparency international regarding India. Which is the root cause of this anarchy.
The job of the police is to be instrumental in maintaining law and order in the state but the factual position is that police itself are most dangerous law breakers.
ReplyDeleteRight to information act 2005 has been put into dustbin by the government staff to promote corruption in the government machinery which is quite obvious from the working of the various public authorities under the government.
ReplyDelete