Lucknow Development Authority made the mockery of High court order


Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2023/0010783

Grievance Concerns To

Name Of Complainant

Yogi M. P. Singh

Date of Receipt


Received By Ministry/Department

Uttar Pradesh

Grievance Description

The matter concerns deep-rooted corruption and the date when the committee formed more than one and half years passed but they are only procrastinating on the matter of serious allegations of corruption. The committee only seeks the document but never takes action in the matter because of corruption. Grievance Status for registration number : PMOPG/E/2022/0332338

Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant Yogi M P Singh

Date of Receipt 16/12/2022 Received By Ministry/Department Prime Ministers OfficeIf High court ordered to decide the title suit, why Lucknow development authority executed the registry without deciding the title suit? It is a bitter truth that our system has been insensitive because of the rampant corruption.

An application on behalf of Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Angad Prasad Singh under Article 51 A of the constitution of India.

Lucknow development authority, lower court Lucknow and Lucknow police took under their teeth the order passed by the Lucknow bench of the high court of judicature at Allahabad.

I pray before the Honourable Sir order dated 07-03-2006 passed by Justice B.B. Agarwal of Lucknow bench of the High court of judicature at Allahabad It is simply ordered that the respondent number 4 to 7 shall open the lock of the staircase so that Smt Anuradha Singh the petitioner may come out of the house and take the proper and appropriate remedy in the competent court and after that, she may have the liberty to go anywhere. Respondent 1. Dept. of home 2-Police commissioner Lucknow 3-SHO police station -Ashiana,

Moreover, Honourable Justice in its order said that the raised matter is civil and amenable by filing a title suit before the court or authority.

It is most surprising that the subordinate court is running away from taking perusal of order dated 07-03-2006 passed by Justice B.B. Agarwal of Lucknow bench of the High court of judicature at Allahabad and office monitoring body running away from transparency and accountability ipso facto.

Whether Lucknow development authority will disclose this fact that which court of law provided the civil remedy in the matter and decided the title suit between the Anuradha Singh and Dinesh Pratap Singh if not done so on what basis registry was carried out without taking the reference of the high court order which was mandatory for the Lucknow development authority to comply with the order passed by the highest court of law in the state of Uttar Pradesh.

Lucknow Development Authority again overlooked the matter of deep-rooted corruption quite obvious from its report submitted on PG Portal.

Grievance Status for registration number: GOVUP/E/2022/76147

Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant

Yogi M. P. Singh Date of Receipt 19/09/2022

Think about the deep-rooted corruption in the working of the Lucknow development authority which is procrastinating in providing information concerning the setup of enquiry committee which is making inquiry regarding irregularity in the allocation of the plots by the Lucknow development authority and the corruption made during the registry of the plots.

It is well known fact that this matter is pending before the Lucknow development authority since 2017 and they are procrastinating on this matter of corruption by taking recourse of various cunning tricks. Instead of going into the facts of the case they have made a committee now to procrastinate on it. Here matter of fact is that why the order passed by the Lucknow bench of the high court of judicature at Allahabad was not complied by the Lucknow development authority? Why the registry executed by the Lucknow development authority without taking the perusal of the relevant records? Here honesty and sincerity is only on to serve the print and electronic media not in the working of the government departments. Whether it is a good governance as articulated by our great prime minister Mr Narendra Damodar Modi and our chief minister Yogi Adityanath ?

Grievance Document

Current Status

Grievance received   

Date of Action


Officer Concerns To

Forwarded to

Uttar Pradesh

Officer Name

Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary)

Organisation name

Uttar Pradesh

Contact Address

Chief Minister Secretariat , Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow

Email Address

Contact Number


Reminder(s) / Clarification(s)

Reminder Date



Yogi Adityanath sir it is not reflecting deep rooted corruption in the working of Lucknow development authority.

Our motive is good governance.

श्री मान जी इस समय लखनऊ विकास प्राधिकरण चाहे जनसूचना के तहत आवेदन हो या शिकायत हो या कोई निवेदन हो हर किसी को इस आधार पर नजरअंदाज कर रही है की मामले में समिति गठित कर दी गयी है किन्तु न तो समिति के सन्दर्भ में कुछ बताएँगे और न ही प्रश्न गत प्रकरण को हल करने का ही प्रयास करेंगे तीन वर्षो से मामले में ताल मटोल कर रहे है क्या इसी तरह से योगी सरकार भ्र्ष्टाचार रोकती


An anti-corruption crusader. Motive to build a strong society based on the principle of universal brotherhood. Human rights defender and RTI activist. Working for the betterment of societies and as an anti-corruption crusader for more than 25 years. Our sole motive is to raise the voices of weaker and downtrodden sections of the society and safeguard their human rights. Our motive is to promote the religion of universal brotherhood among the various castes communities of different religions. Man is great by his deeds and character.

Post a Comment

Your view points inspire us

Previous Post Next Post