Grievance Status for registration number: GOVUP/E/2023/0085048

Grievance Concerns To

Name Of Complainant

Yogi M. P. Singh

Date of Receipt

22/12/2023

Received By Ministry/Department

Uttar Pradesh

Grievance Description

Respected executive engineer electricity distribution division 2nd must take the perusal of second and third page of the attached pdf document to the grievance which are addressed to the superintending engineer district Mirzapur Uttar Pradesh and the first page of the attached pdf document which is addressed to the applicant is the same parrot report which has been addressed in earlier two reports addressed to the superintendent engineer. Undoubtedly the Superintendent Engineer is not so competent that he may understand the flaws in the report submitted by you, Honourable Sir, but the applicant can understand. Here it is quite obvious that your report is acceptable to the applicant but it seems that you are not understanding the contents of the grievance which is requesting you that you may follow article 14 of the constitution of India which categorically states that everyone is alike before the law and everyone has equal protection of the law and if the electricity connection can be provided to Preeti W/O Ashok Prasad then why not to her sister in law Sunita, wife of Mr. Mangala Prasad in the same premise?

Grievance Status for registration number: GOVUP/E/2023/0079366, Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant-Yogi M. P. Singh, Date of Receipt-29/11/2023, Received By Ministry/Department-Uttar Pradesh

Executive engineer electricity distribution division 2nd Mr. Rajesh Kumar District Mirzapur must meditate on it.

Mrs. Prabhavati Devi wife of Mr. Ram Avtar Has two sons and two daughters-in-law whose description is as follows.

1-Sunita, wife of Mr. Mangala Prasad and 2-Preeti W/O Ashok Prasad

In the same premises you have provided the electricity connection to the Preeti W/O Ashok Prasad who is the sister-in-law of the aggrieved applicant Sunita, wife of Mr. Mangala Prasad. Why is the following reason not applicable to Preeti W/O Ashok Prasad? Right to reason is an indispensable part of a sound administrative system quoted by the Honourable Supreme Court of India in its several judgments so this reason must be provided to the applicant as required under the law. Under subsection 1 d of the section 4 of the right to information act 2005 it has been categorically stated that it shall be obligatory duty of each public authority to provide the reasons of its decision to the parties concerned. Do not conceal corruption.

Sub Divisional officer Mr Vipin Kumar submitted its report on 10th November 2023 regarding the complaint reference number 60000230207098 and this communication was addressed to executive engineer electricity distribution division 2nd Mr. Rajesh Kumar which is the first page of the attached pdf document to the grievance.

Mrs. Prabhavati Devi wife of Mr. Ram Avtar Has two sons and two daughters-in-law whose description is as follows. 1-Sunita, wife of Mr. Mangala Prasad and 2-Preeti W/O Ashok Prasad Right to reason is the indispensable part of the sound administrative system so it is expected from the executive engineer electricity distribution division 2nd District Mirzapur to provide the reason how can his department provided the electricity connection to Preeti wife of Ashok Prasad In the same premises? Undoubtedly subordinates of the executive engineer provided the connection to the lady after taking illegal gratification otherwise there was no legitimate reason to provide the connection. From the contents of the grievance and the report submitted by the executive engineer electricity distribution division 2nd, It is quite obvious that there is no relevance between the report and the grievance. It is quite obvious that our chief minister has failed to curb corruption in the Department of electricity.

In entire reports, the contents of the grievances were not touched by both the officers, but they justified the illegal stand of their subordinate which is a mockery of the law of land and such practices must be stopped at any cost. This is not the reflection of the honesty of our political masters.

Grievance Document

Current Status

Case closed   

Date of Action

10/01/2024

Remarks

अधीनस्थ अधिकारी के स्तर पर निस्तारित अधीनस्थ अधिकारी के स्तर पर निस्तारित अधीनस्थ अधिकारी के स्तर पर निस्तारित आख्या श्रेणी - प्रकरण सुझाव श्रेणी का है

On line complaint no 60000230255238 has been closed On line complaint no 60000230255238 has been closed

Reply Document

Rating

1

Poor

Rating Remarks

Think about the gravity of situation, repeated representations have been submitted by the applicant to remove the anomalies in providing the electricity connections to the aggrieved connection holders who made the application for electricity connection and concerned staff are not considering because of corruption in the department. It is quite obvious that in the form of solution executive engineer electricity distribution division second has provided a new suggestion to apply on the Jhatpat Portal of the Department of electricity government of Uttar Pradesh for the electricity connection. It seems that they are not providing the electricity connection to Sunita as provided to her sister-in-law in same premises in view of article 14 of the constitution of India. Think about transparent and accountable governance being provided by Yogi Adityanath in which corruption is prevailed throughout system and no one is taking cognizance of it. Poor people are suffering because of this anarchy.

Appeal Details

Appeal Number

Date of Receipt

Appeal Text

Current Status

Officer Concerns To

Officer Name

Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary)

Organisation name

Government of Uttar Pradesh

Contact Address

Chief Minister Secretariat , Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow

Email Address

bhaskar.12214@gov.in

Contact Number

05222226350