L.D.A. must provide information to Dinesh Pratap Singh concerning deep rooted corruption in the working of the Lucknow Development Authority

Gmail Beerbhadra Singh <myogimpsingh@gmail.com>

RTI Online - Called For Hearing.

1 message

RTI-Online <onlinertihelpline.up@gov.in> 13 July 2023 at 14:45

Reply-To: RTI-Online <onlinertihelpline.up@gov.in>

To: Dinesh Pratap Singh <myogimpsingh@gmail.com>

Dear Sir/Madam,

This is with reference to your RTI appeal registered vide Registration number LKDPA/A/2021/60160

You are requested to come for Hearing on Date 17/07/2023 & Time 12:00 PM and Location & Remarks are OLD BUILDING, FIRST FLOUR, APAR SACHIV CAMP

Please log on to https://rtionline.up.gov.in to check the status of your appeal. 

Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2023/0064300

Grievance Concerns To

Name Of Complainant

Keshav Pratap Singh alias Tantrik K P Singh

Date of Receipt

28/09/2023

Received By Ministry/Department

Uttar Pradesh

Grievance Description

The matter concerns corruption of Lucknow Development Authority.

Status PARTIES SUMMONED FOR HEARING as on 17/07/2023 , 12:00 PM

OLD BUILDING, FIRST FLOUR, APAR SACHIV CAMP

This implies that Lucknow Development Authority can provide the 3 point information which have sought by the information seeker, to the information seeker. Please take a glance of the attached PDF documents to the grievance in which communication of the Public Information Officer Shraddha Choudhary is also included who did not provide the information by taking the recourse that committee has been set up by the Lucknow Development Authority to make enquiry into the matter.

An application under Article 51 A of the constitution of India on behalf of Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Angad Prasad Singh to make enquiry regarding the set up and findings of committee to look into irregularity in registration of plots and its allocation to beneficiaries. Report submitted by the Tehsildar Vivek Kumar Shukla on 31/05/2022 of L.D.A. is the same parrot report as submitted earlier by various staff of L.D.A. For more details, vide attached document to the grievance.

Undoubtedly the matter concerns the deep-rooted corruption and the concerned staff of the Lucknow development authority are procrastinating on the matter for many years and such reports are the integral part of their corrupt and mysterious dealings. Two years have passed till the formation of the committee to take action in the matter but still no action has been taken by the committee. Whether it is not procrastination and showing the ulterior design of the public authority. They themselves are accepting the fact that they have told repeatedly to the complainant that a committee has been formed and they are taking action in the matter but in this way they have passed many years whether it reflects the transparency and accountability in the working of the public authority Lucknow development authority? Whether it reflects the characteristic of an anti-corruption government as claimed by the accountable public functionaries of the Government of Uttar Pradesh?

Registration Number LKDPA/A/2021/60160

Name Dinesh Pratap Singh

Date of Filing 02/10/2021

Status PARTIES SUMMONED FOR HEARING as on 17/07/2023 , 12:00 PM

OLD BUILDING, FIRST FLOUR, APAR SACHIV CAMP

Nodal Officer Details

Name Rekha Doharey

Telephone Number 7081100326

Email-ID ldartionline@gmail.com

Registration Number LKDPA/R/2021/60285

Name Dinesh Pratap Singh

Date of Filing 04/08/2021

Status REQUEST DISPOSED OF as on 08/10/2021

This R.T.I. communique is submitted by Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Angad Prasad Singh who is the claimant of the plot of the land quite obvious from the order passed by the Lucknow bench of the High court of judicature at Allahabad in the Writ Petition Number 135 HC Year 2006. In the Writ Petition Number 135 HC Year 2006 filed in the Lucknow bench of the High court of Judicature at Allahabad filed by Anuradha Singh also named Guddi also named Aradhana Singh through her mother Beena Singh wife of Brijraj Singh also Beena Singh wife of Netrpal Singh. Whether in the same matter, to get remedy from various redressal bodies and get public aid by changing the name is not illegal?

In the aforementioned writ, Anuradha Singh was directed by the High court of judicature to seek civil remedy from competent authority by filing a title suit.

1-L.D.A. may provide the detail of title suit filed by multi-named lady Anuradha Singh in the record of L.D.A. Guddi Singh including the designation, name of the public staff who executed it with posting detail.

2-L.D.A. may provide the copy of the order passed by the competent court decided the title suit of the Anuradha Singh in the compliance of the High court order in the Writ Petition Number 135 HC Year 2006.

3-L.D.A. may provide the detail of the posting of the staffs executed the registry of plots to allottees with designation and name so that accountability may be fixed.

Grievance Document

Current Status

Grievance received   

Date of Action

28/09/2023

Officer Concerns To

Forwarded to

Uttar Pradesh

Officer Name

Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary)

Organisation name

Uttar Pradesh

Contact Address

Chief Minister Secretariat , Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow

Email Address

bhaskar.12214@gov.in

Contact Number

05222226350

To see the attached document to the grievance, please click on the link

Beerbhadra Singh

To write blogs and applications for the deprived sections who can not raise their voices to stop their human rights violations by corrupt bureaucrats and executives.

Post a Comment

Your view points inspire us

Previous Post Next Post