Submissions before Uttar Pradesh Human Rights Commission by widow Kiran Singh
Prayer - Kiran Singh is a 50 years old widow somehow managing house affairs. Father-in-law Raghuvar Dayal Singh, master of the entire hereditary property, transited from the ancestors not earned by him a single coin hatching conspiracy to deprive her and her two sons by reaping the benefit of vulnerability of widows and mismanagement and corruption in the office of sub-divisional magistrate Sadar.
Most respectfully sheweth that
1-Sub-divisional Magistrate Sadar district-Mirzapur instead of preferring to provide justice to vulnerable sections by the applications of vested powers provided by the government to him depriving them in the name flimsy procedural lacunae can never be justified in wide public interest.
2-If any matter is of judicial nature and remedy is available under section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, then instead of overlooking the plea of the vulnerable widow by searching clinching procedural lacunae, he/S.D.M. Sadar should be instrumental in sorting out minute defects.
3-Subsequently father-in-law sold a joint property transited from ancestors partly depriving two of his sons of it including widow and one son. Through its report dated 17/07/2021, SDM sadar made available that sought remedy under section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 and later said that the father-in-law can sell and keep the mortgage entirely property inherited from ancestors if we will not file a case before him under section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.
4-Numerous objections were made and SDM Sadar overlooked them in the name of inviting petitions under section 116 moreover, allowed the sale of piece of land in meanwhile which is corruption as arbitrarily deprivation of two sons from their property.
5-Aggrieved applicant widow Kiran Singh W/O Late Jagdish Singh submitted a case under the aforementioned section before the court of S.D.M. Sadar so later must entertain it in a cordial manner with sympathy which is attached to this representation.
6-Whether the objections of a widow can be neglected and father-in-law Raghuvar Dayal Singh S/O Bhanu Pratap Singh can deprive her from ancestral property by colluding with staffs of Tahsil sadar quite obvious from the cryptic replies and reports which are inconsistent to submissions of grievances.
7- Here to mislead innocent and gullible people and deprive them from their properties arbitrarily is more important than to deliver them justice. Such practices are quite rampant in the office of SDM Sadar, district-Mirzapur.
COMPLAINT / CASE STATUS
COMPLAINT / CASE STATUS
SHRC, Uttar Pradesh
Case Details
HRCNet HRCNet HRCNet
Diary No 3199/IN/2021 Case / File No 3588/24/55/2021-WC
Victim Name KIRAN SINGH Registration Date 15/11/2021
Action List (Click on Action given in blue color to view details)
No action taken yet
Expand All Action List
Complaint
Diary No 3199/IN/2021 Section M-2
Language ENGLISH Mode BY INTERNET
Received Date 14/11/2021 Complaint Date 14/11/2021
Victim
Victim Name KIRAN SINGH Gender Female
Religion Hindu Cast General
Address VILLAGE - KOTHARA KANTIT, BALUA, POST - SHREE NIVAS DHAM, POLICE STATION - JIGANA,
District MIRZAPUR State UTTAR PRADESH
HRCNet HRCNet HRCNet
Complainant
Name YOGI M. P. SINGH
Address MOHALLA SUREKAPURAM, SHRI LAXMI NARAYAN BAIKUNTH MAHADEV MANDIR, JABALPUR ROAD
District MIRZAPUR State UTTAR PRADESH ( 231001 )
Incident
Incident Place TAHSIL SADAR MIRZAPUR Incident Date 17/07/2021
Incident Category EXPLOITATION OF WOMEN
Incident District MIRZAPUR Incident State UTTAR PRADESH
Incident Details
Tags:
Judiciary
Kiran Singh is a 50 years old widow somehow managing house affairs. Father-in-law Raghuvar Dayal Singh, master of the entire hereditary property, transited from the ancestors not earned by him a single coin hatching conspiracy to deprive her and her two sons by reaping the benefit of vulnerability of widows and mismanagement and corruption in the office of sub-divisional magistrate Sadar.
ReplyDelete