Pradip Kumar Maurya was not provided information as UPSIC arbitrarily rejected the appeal through its registry quite obvious

 











Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2021/34562
Grievance Concerns To
Name Of Complainant
Yogi M P Singh
Date of Receipt
14/07/2021
Received By Ministry/Department
Uttar Pradesh
Grievance Description
UPSIC is flooded with incompetent staff who are inefficient to process to appeals and complaints submitted before it.
An institution invites the removal of objections from appellant through notice but UPSIC returns the entire appeal through a parrot note. Whether it is not a mismanagement of a constitutional institution?
Mismanagement and corruption in the working of Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission.
Subject-Objection made by the commission in the appeal dated 23/07/2020 received in the office of Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission on 30/07/2020 through a communication dated 05/10/2020 received by the applicant on 16/11/2020 is arbitrary and illegal.
The objections made by the Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission are as follows.
1-Appellant has not attached a copy of R.T.I. Communique submitted under subsection 1 section 6 of Right Information Act 2005 to the second appeal dated 23/07/2020.
2- Appellant has not attached a copy of R.T.I. first appeal submitted under subsection 1 section 19 of Right Information Act 2005 to the second appeal dated 23/07/2020.
3- Appellant did not verify that no appeal submitted under subsection 3 of section 19 earlier in the same matter.

Replies of the applicant before the accountable public functionaries including State Information Commission of Uttar Pradesh are as follows, respectively.

1-The submission 5 of the appeal dated 23/07/2020 contains the status of R.T.I. communique and application submitted under subsection 1 of section 6 of the Right to Information Act 2005 registered on the portal of the Government of Uttar Pradesh. Vide attached document to the representation.

2-The submission 2 of the appeal dated 23/07/2020 contains the status of the appeal regarding R.T.I. Communique registered on the portal of the Government of Uttar Pradesh under subsection 1 of section 19 of the Right to Information Act 2005. Vide attached document to the representation.

The submission 3 of the appeal dated 23/07/2020 has contained the application of R.T.I. appeal submitted under subsection 1 of section 19 of the Right to Information Act 2005 registered on the portal of the Government of Uttar Pradesh. Vide attached document to the representation.

3-Appellant can not verify that he submitted an appeal before the commission before appeal dated 23/07/2020 in the same matter as it is a subject of commission.

But the appellant affirms he did not submit any appeal before the Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission before the appeal dated 23/07/2020 in the same matter.

Undoubtedly the Government has passed the august act, but the information is not accessible to citizens because of arbitrariness, tyranny and corruption in the government machinery. O God help me in my pious approach to the betterment of society.
Grievance Document
Current Status
Grievance received   
Date of Action
14/07/2021
Officer Concerns To
Forwarded to
Uttar Pradesh
Officer Name
Shri Bhaskar Pandey
Officer Designation
Joint Secretary
Contact Address
Chief Minister Secretariat Room No.321 U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow
Email Address
bhaskar.12214@gov.in
Contact Number
2226350
Beerbhadra Singh

To write blogs and applications for the deprived sections who can not raise their voices to stop their human rights violations by corrupt bureaucrats and executives.

5 Comments

Your view points inspire us

  1. Right to information act 2005 was introduced by the government of India during the regime of Congress but when the BJP government came into the power.
    Bhartiya Janata party from the beginning started diluting provisions of right to information act which is a mockery of law of land.
    They closed the submitted grievances through arbitrary reports on the public grievance portal of the government of India. Undoubtedly government key functionaries are creating blocked in the path of information seekers. Transparency ombudsman itself playing negative role in providing information.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Present time there is tacit understanding between the administrative high rank public functionaries and the staff of the state information commission resulting in non providing information to the citizenry in the state. Government of Uttar Pradesh headed by Yogi Adityanath also providing blessings to such corrupt public functionaries and promoting the Nexus between the Uttar Pradesh state information commission and the corrupt bureaucrats in the state of Uttar Pradesh.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Pradeep Kumar Maurya is knocking entire doors of the public functionaries in the Government of India but still his date of birth is unrectified by the office of the additional secretary regional office Varanasi. board of High school and intermediate at prayagraj government of Uttar Pradesh.
    Whether it is not corruption but it is unfortunate that no one is taking action against the corrupt elements in the government machinery.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Think about the rampant corruption in the office of transparency ombudsman in the Government of Uttar Pradesh which is shocking and I think that action must be take against such wrongdoer registrar.

    This aggrieved student Pradeep Kumar Maurya is knocking the door of the accountable public functionaries of this democracy since 2015 but no one pay heed to the representation of of this student while the error in the the date of birth of the aggrieved student it is because of the carelessness of the staff of the board but now they are doing bargaining in the matter as there is rampant corruption in the office of additional secretary regional office Varanasi Board of High School and Intermediate government of Uttar Pradesh.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Undoubtedly it is a mockery of the provisions of right to information act 2005 because of corruption registrar of the Uttar Pradesh state information commission played a negative role in providing information to the information seekers.
    Think about the gravity of situation that aggrieved student is not being provided rectified marksheet by the office of the additional secretary regional office Varanasi board of High school and intermediate at prayagraj government of Uttar Pradesh. This matter is pending since the year 2015.

    ReplyDelete
Previous Post Next Post