UPSIC itself playing negative role in providing information to Dinesh Pratap Singh as mockery of High court order was done by secretary

 














Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2021/34607

Grievance Concerns To
Name Of Complainant
Yogi M P Singh
Date of Receipt
14/07/2021
Received By Ministry/Department
Uttar Pradesh
Grievance Description
Instead of show of, we must take genuine steps to curb the steep hike in growing corruption.

An institution invites the removal of objections from appellant through notice, but UPSIC returns the entire appeal through a parrot note. Whether it is not a mismanagement of a constitutional institution?
Mismanagement and corruption in the working of Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission.
Subject-Objection made by the commission in the appeal dated 23/07/2020 received in the office of Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission on 30/07/2020 through a communication dated 05/10/2020 received by the applicant on 31/10/2020 is arbitrary and illegal.
The objections made by the Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission are as follows.

1-Appellant has not attached a copy of R.T.I. Communique submitted under subsection 1 section 6 of Right Information Act 2005 to the second appeal dated 23/07/2020.

2- Appellant has not attached a copy of R.T.I. first appeal submitted under subsection 1 section 19 of Right Information Act 2005 to the second appeal dated 23/07/2020.

3- Appellant did not verify that no appeal submitted under subsection 3 of section 19 earlier in the same matter.

Replies of the applicant before the accountable public functionaries including State Information Commission of Uttar Pradesh are as follows respectively.

1-The submission 2 of the appeal dated 23/07/2020 contains the status and application of R.T.I. Communique registered on the portal of the Government of Uttar Pradesh as forwarded by the department of justice under subsection 3 of section 6 of R.T.I. Act of 2005. Vide attached document to the representation.

2- The submission 3 of the appeal dated 23/07/2020 contains the status and application of R.T.I. appeal submitted under subsection 1 of section 19 of the Right to Information Act 2005 registered on the portal of the Government of Uttar Pradesh. Vide attached document to the representation.

3-Appellant can not verify that he submitted an appeal before the commission before appeal dated 23/07/2020 in the same matter as it is subject of commission.

But appellant affirms that no appeal, he submitted before the Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission before the appeal dated 23/07/2020 in the same matter.

Undoubtedly the Government has passed the august act, but the information is not accessible to citizens because of arbitrariness, tyranny and corruption in the government machinery. O God help me in my pious approach, betterment to society.
Grievance Document
Current Status
Grievance received   
Date of Action
14/07/2021
Officer Concerns To
Forwarded to
Uttar Pradesh
Officer Name
Shri Bhaskar Pandey
Officer Designation
Joint Secretary
Contact Address
Chief Minister Secretariat Room No.321 U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow
Email Address
bhaskar.12214@gov.in
Contact Number
2226350
Beerbhadra Singh

To write blogs and applications for the deprived sections who can not raise their voices to stop their human rights violations by corrupt bureaucrats and executives.

5 Comments

Whatever comments you make, it is your responsibility to use facts. You may not make unwanted imputations against any body which may be baseless otherwise commentator itself will be responsible for the derogatory remarks made against any body proved to be false at any appropriate forum.

  1. Concerned police and Lucknow development authority made the mockery of the order passed by the single bench of the Lucknow bench of the High court of judicature At Allahabad Lower court acted under good faith of the corrupt public staffs of the government of Uttar Pradesh. Now Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission showed its real face of corruption and denied to entertain the second appeal submitted by the appellant.
    Right to information act 2005 was introduced by the government of India during the regime of Congress but when the BJP government came into the power.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Present time there is tacit understanding between the administrative high rank public functionaries and the staff of the state information commission resulting in non providing information to the citizenry in the state. Government of Uttar Pradesh headed by Yogi Adityanath also providing blessings to such corrupt public functionaries and promoting the Nexus between the Uttar Pradesh state information commission and the corrupt bureaucrats in the state of Uttar Pradesh.
    It seems that Yogi government in the state of Uttar Pradesh has promised not to provide any information to the information seekers.

    ReplyDelete
  3. On the one side screen Uttar Pradesh Police belonging to the state capital Lucknow made a mockery of the High court order passed by the Lucknow bench of the high court of judicature at Allahabad and on the other side of the screen they made the mockery of the right to information act 2005 by not providing information.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Think about the rampant corruption in the office of transparency ombudsman in the Government of Uttar Pradesh which is shocking and I think that action must be take against such wrongdoer registrar.

    Already police had made the mockery of the law of land by taking under teeth the direction passed by the Lucknow bench of the high court of judicature at Allahabad and now Uttar Pradesh state information commission has showed its real face to the public.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Undoubtedly it is a mockery of the provisions of right to information act 2005 because of corruption registrar of the Uttar Pradesh state information commission played a negative role in providing information to the information seekers.
    Think about the gravity of situation that aggrieved individual facing the non compliance of the high court order by the police concerned and now his appeal was arbitrarily rejected by the Uttar Pradesh state information commission.

    ReplyDelete
Previous Post Next Post