Additional sub divisional magistrate Sadar made travesty of justice to pave the way of corruption alleged by Om Prakash Dubey

Grievance Status for registration number: GOVUP/E/2023/0082519

Grievance Concerns To

Name Of Complainant

Om Prakash Dubey

Date of Receipt

12/12/2023

Received By Ministry/Department

Uttar Pradesh

Grievance Description

In the following grievance tahsildar Sadar submitted arbitrary and inconsistent report on 4th October 2023 which is misleading and attached as the first page to the attached PDF document to the grievance.

Grievance Status for registration number: GOVUP/E/2023/0060667, Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant-Om Prakash Dubey, Date of Receipt-14/09/2023, Received By Ministry/Department-Uttar Pradesh

According to the report submitted by tahsildar Sadar, the applicant is aggrieved with the order passed by the court of additional sub divisional magistrate which was passed by additional sub divisional magistrate on 26th July 2022 and the applicant submitted objection against the order which was not accepted by the court.

According to the order passed by additional sub divisional magistrate Sadar Mr Siddharth Yadav on 26th July 2022 the applicant had no objection with the partition because applicant had not submitted objection before the court and on that basis, decree was made in favour of opposite party. For the more details, please take a glance of the 6th page of the attached PDF Document to the grievance.

The applicant wants to draw the kind attention of the most respected Sir to the page 8 of the attached PDF document which is the nakal provided by the concerned court which is itself proving that the applicant has submitted the objection in the court on 18th March 2019. In the note of the concerned staff of the court it has been categorically mentioned that objection cum affidavit with supporting documents submitted on behalf Aditya Narayan Dubey and today advocates are on strike.

It is quite obvious that the matter concerns the deep rooted anarchy and corruption in the working of the additional sub divisional magistrate during the execution of the quasi-judicial work which is the travesty of justice must not be overlooked by the government of Uttar Pradesh.

Grievance Document

Current Status

Grievance received   

Date of Action

12/12/2023

Officer Concerns To

Forwarded to

Uttar Pradesh

Officer Name

Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary)

Organisation name

Uttar Pradesh

Contact Address

Chief Minister Secretariat , Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow

Email Address

bhaskar.12214@gov.in

Contact Number

05222226350

Grievance Status for registration number: GOVUP/E/2023/0060667

Grievance Concerns To

Name Of Complainant

Om Prakash Dubey

Date of Receipt

14/09/2023

Received By Ministry/Department

Uttar Pradesh

Grievance Description

Respected Superintendent of police District- Mirzapur, the applicant is agreed with the viewpoint of circle officer city Prabhat Roy and his successor Parmanand Kushwaha that objection has been submitted by the applicant which was overlooked by the assistant sub divisional magistrate Sadar Mr Siddharth Yadav and later with the paper book it was filed into the office record as usual.

Consequently a corrupt order was passed by the assistant sub divisional magistrate Sadar Mr Siddharth Yadav which is punishable under the law of land.

It is the obligatory duty of the police to register a first information report in the matter against assistant sub divisional magistrate Sadar who passed a partial order through his cryptic and mysterious dealings comes under the category of corruption. If the government of Uttar Pradesh headed by Yogi Adityanath Sir is really interested to curb the corruption from the government machinery, then it must order to register a first information report in the matter of deep-rooted corruption in quasi-judicial proceedings.

Whether the police have checked the office file? Please tell me the name and designation of the staff of the police under Article 51 A of the constitution of India who checked the paper book filed in the office. In decision, it has been mentioned वाद दर्ज कर सहखातेदारों को नोटिस जारी की गयी। सम्मन तामील न होने पर रजिस्ट्री सम्मन जारी किया गया। प्रतिवादीगण न्यायालय उपस्थित आये । पत्रावली में संलग्न खतौनी में पक्ष खातेदार हैं तथा अंश के सम्बन्ध में कोई विवाद नहीं है तथा फाट के सम्बन्ध में कोई आपत्ति नहीं किया है। लेखपाल द्वारा प्रस्तुत फाट दिनांक 26. 02.2019 व रिपोर्ट दिनांक 19.03.2019 पर वादी व प्रतिवादी संख्या 1 व 4 द्वारा उपस्थित होकर सहमति व्यक्त की गयी।This implies that the applicant cum respondent has not submitted objection against partition and my learned counsel made objection on it during argument but the objection submitted by the applicant cum respondent was missing from the paper book. If the applicant cum respondent agreed to the partition, why did he file an appeal against this order quite obvious from the second page of the attached PDF document. आदेश पत्रक

न्यायालय अपर उपजिलाधिकारी सदर मण्डल : विन्ध्याचल, जनपद : मिर्जापुर, तहसील सदर • वाद संख्या :- RST/0025172021 कंप्यूटरीकृत वाद संख्या : - D202116530000251

सूर्यनरायन दुबे बनाम उमाशंकर दुबे व अन्य

अंतर्गत धारा :- 176, अधिनियम : उ0प्र0 ज० वि० भू० व्य० अधिनियम, 1950

निर्णय

प्रस्तुत बाद सूर्यनरायन दूबे पुत्र स्व0 श्यामाचरन दूबे नि०ग्राम नीवी गहरवार तप्पा 96 परगना कंतित तहसील सदर जनपद मीरजापुर ने ज० वि० अधि० की धारा 176 के अन्तर्गत वाद दायर कर यह कहा गया है कि हम वादी व प्रतिवादीगण के बाद कागजात माल में हम वादी और प्रतिवादीगण का नाम बतौर संक्रमणीय भूमिधर काश्तकार हैं। वादी एवं प्रतिवादीगण संख्या 1 ता 4 आराजियात निम्न पर अपने-अपने हक व हिस्से के मुताबिक संयुक्त रूप से काबिज है फसल वगै0 कास्त कर रहे हैं परन्तु अक्सर आराजियात निम्न के बावत् आपस में बटवारा को लेकर विवाद उत्पन्न होता रहता है। वादी ने कई बार प्रतिवादी संख्या 1 ता 4 से बटवारा हेतु कहा। वादी का हक व हिस्सा 1/5 है जिसे अलग किया जाना आवश्यक है। विनाय मुखासियत हाजा नवम्बर 2014 में व दादी ने अपने अलग हिस्से पर गेहूं की फसल कास्त करने को कहा और प्रतिवादीगण संख्या 1 ता 4 राजी नहीं हुये

वाद दर्ज कर सहखातेदारों को नोटिस जारी की गयी। सम्मन तामील न होने पर रजिस्ट्री सम्मन जारी किया गया। प्रतिवादीगण न्यायालय उपस्थित आये । पत्रावली में संलग्न खतौनी में पक्ष खातेदार हैं तथा अंश के सम्बन्ध में कोई विवाद नहीं है तथा फाट के सम्बन्ध में कोई आपत्ति नहीं किया है। लेखपाल द्वारा प्रस्तुत फाट दिनांक 26. 02.2019 व रिपोर्ट दिनांक 19.03.2019 पर वादी व प्रतिवादी संख्या 1 व 4 द्वारा उपस्थित होकर सहमति व्यक्त की गयी।

आदेश

अतः क्षेत्रीय लेखपाल द्वारा प्रस्तुत फाट विवरण व नजरी नक्शा दिनांक 26.02.2019 व रिपोर्ट दिनांक 19.03.2019 उपरोक्त विवेचना के आधार पर स्वीकार किया जाता है। तद्नुसार उचित स्टाम्प पर डिकी बनायी जाय। वाद परवाना अमलदरामद जारी हो। वाद आ०का० पत्रावली दाखिल दफ्तर हो।

दिनांक- 26.07.2022

(सिद्धार्थ यादव) अपर उप जिलाधिकारी, सदर, मीरजापुर

Grievance Document

Current Status

Case closed   

Date of Action

05/10/2023

Remarks

प्रकरण में सम्बंधित से आख्या प्राप्त कर निस्तारण हेतु प्रेषित है आख्या संलग्न है Akhya upload kar sewa me sadar agrasarit hai

Reply Document

Rating

1

Poor

Rating Remarks

NotSatisfied

Appeal Details

Appeal Number

Date of Receipt

Appeal Text

Current Status

Officer Concerns To

Officer Name

Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary)

Organisation name

Government of Uttar Pradesh

Contact Address

Chief Minister Secretariat , Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow

Email Address

bhaskar.12214@gov.in

Contact Number

05222226350

To see the attached document to the grievance, please click on the link

Beerbhadra Singh

To write blogs and applications for the deprived sections who can not raise their voices to stop their human rights violations by corrupt bureaucrats and executives.

Post a Comment

Your view points inspire us

Previous Post Next Post