Victim is seeking enquiry against S.H.O. Mauaima who played cryptic role in registering false F.I.R. against victim and his father ipso facto

 


संदर्भ संख्या : 60000230125150 , दिनांक - 02 Jul 2023 तक की स्थिति

आवेदनकर्ता का विवरण :

शिकायत संख्या:-60000230125150

आवेदक का नाम-Yogi M. P. Singh

विषय-An application under Article 51A of the constitution of India on behalf of Saurabh Singh alias Rajan Singh son of Tej Bahadur Singh to seek enquiry against station house officer police station Mauaima District Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh. The fault of the victim Sourabh Singh alias Rajan Singh son of Tej Bahadur Singh is that he was requesting station house officer Mauaima to register an FIR in the matter in which victim was mercilessly beaten by the offenders. Whether the victim and his father have no right to register a first information report against the criminal elements who assaulted the victim mercilessly in this largest democracy in the world. Undoubtedly it is travesty of justice which must be looked into by the Commissioner of Prayagraj to save the credit of the Prayagraj police. The matter is amenable before the Commissioner of Prayagraj district Prayagraj as directed by the State human rights commission of Uttar Pradesh. To Honourable Commissioner district prayagraj Subject -Please direct the competent officer to check the role of the station house officer Mauaima for implicating Saurabh Singh and his father Tej Bahadur Singh under the false charges by falsely implicating under various sections of IPC to both of them. According to the Honourable member of the State human rights commission Lucknow, in the commission remedy is available against unfair investigation by police but in commission there is no remedy if the police abuses their power and rank to implicate a person under false charges to wreak vengeance as the victim made efforts to register FIR against the criminal elements who had sympathy of the police concerned. The Honourable member of the State human rights commission of Uttar Pradesh passed the following order in the case Diary No 1188/IN/2023 Case / File No 1085/24/4/2023 Victim Name SAURABH SINGH ALIAS RAJAN SINGH Registration Date 03/04/2023 Action Date 07/06/2023 Authority - NA Procceeding Perused the complaint of Sri Yogi M P Singh dated 31.03.2023. It appears that the victim is an accused in case crime no 98/2023 under section 323/504/506/427/354/380 of Police Station Mauaima District Prayagraj. He alleges that he has been falsely implicated in the aforesaid case. The issue regarding the innocence of the complainant cannot be decided by the Commission as the same falls within the domain of investigation. There is no allegation in the complaint that the case is not being investigated fairly. If the complainant has any grievance against the S.H.O. of Police Station of Mauaima he may approach the Police Commissioner, Prayagraj who shall look into the matter and pass an appropriate order.

विभाग -पुलिसशिकायत श्रेणी -

नियोजित तारीख-12-07-2023शिकायत की स्थिति-

स्तर -निदेशालय / विभागाध्यक्ष स्तर/नपद -महानिदेशक

प्राप्त रिमाइंडर-

प्राप्त फीडबैक -दिनांक को फीडबैक:-

फीडबैक की स्थिति -

संलग्नक देखें -Click here

नोट- अंतिम कॉलम में वर्णित सन्दर्भ की स्थिति कॉलम-5 में अंकित अधिकारी के स्तर पर हुयी कार्यवाही दर्शाता है!

अधीनस्थ द्वारा प्राप्त आख्या :

क्र.स. सन्दर्भ का प्रकार आदेश देने वाले अधिकारी अग्रसारित दिनांक आदेश आख्या देने वाले अधिकारी आख्या दिनांक आख्या स्थिति आपत्ति देखे संलगनक

1 अंतरित लोक शिकायत अनुभाग - 1(, मुख्यमंत्री कार्यालय ) 27-06-2023 कृपया शीघ्र नियमानुसार कार्यवाही किये जाने की अपेक्षा की गई है। महानिदेशक -पुलिस 30-06-2023 आख्या श्रेणी - अन्य कारण

महोदय IGRS प्रणाली में RTI से सम्बन्धित सूचना देय नही है। निस्तारित

To see attached document to grievance,

click on link

Beerbhadra Singh

To write blogs and applications for the deprived sections who can not raise their voices to stop their human rights violations by corrupt bureaucrats and executives.

Post a Comment

Whatever comments you make, it is your responsibility to use facts. You may not make unwanted imputations against any body which may be baseless otherwise commentator itself will be responsible for the derogatory remarks made against any body proved to be false at any appropriate forum.

Previous Post Next Post