Your RTI Request filed successfully.
Please note down the following details for further references.
Registration Number DOCMO/R/2021/60661
Name Yogi M P Singh
Date of Filing 25-08-2021
RTI Fee Received 10
Online Reference Number IK0BGDGXS6
Transaction Status Success
Request filed with Chief Minister office
Contact Details of Nodal Officer
Telephone Number 9454412725
Email-ID sunil.12725@gov.in
Online RTI Request Form Details
Public Authority Details :-
* Public Authority Chief Minister office
Personal Details of RTI Applicant:-
Registration Number DOCMO/R/2021/60661
Date of Filing 25/08/2021
* Name Yogi M P Singh
Gender Male
* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Lakshmi Narayan Baikunth Mahadev Mandir, Jabalpur Road
Pincode 231001
Country India
State Uttar Pradesh
Status Details not provided
Pincode Literate
Above Graduate
Phone Number Details not provided
Mobile Number +91-7379105911
Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
Request Details :-
Citizenship Indian
* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No
((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )
* Description of Information Sought आवेदनकर्ता का विवरण : शिकायत संख्या:-60000210110527 आवेदक का नाम-Yogi M P Singh दिनांक12-08-2021 को फीडबैक:-महोदय जब प्रकरण राज्य सूचना आयोग उत्तर प्रदेश से है तो और खुद मंडी समित चौकी इंचार्ज बाली मौर्या ने भी अपने अपने रिपोर्ट में कहा है और उसी रिपोर्ट के आधार पर शिकायत को बंद कर दिए जब खुद हिंदी में लिखे है की आवेदक आवेदक द्वारा राज्य सूचना आयोग के कुप्रबंधन और भ्र्ष्टाचार की शिकायत प्रार्थी द्वारा किया गया है इसलिए प्रार्थना पत्र का निस्तारण राज्य सूचना आयोग के वरिष्ठ अधिकारी द्वारा कराया जाना समीचीन होगा और हास्यास्पद यह है की आप द्वारा द्वारा इस रिपोर्ट को आधार बना कर शिकायत निस्तारित लिया गया जो की भ्रष्टाचार को पोषित करने वाला है कृपया भूल का परिमार्जन करे For more detail, vide attached document to the R.T.I. rquest.
Public information officer in the office of the chief minister, government of Uttar Pradesh may provide the following information as sought.
1-According to chauki incharge, Mandi Samiti, the matter concerns the mismanagement and corruption of Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission so it is expedient to carryout enquiry by the senior rank of officer of the commission.
Provide the detail of officer nominated to carry out enquiry in regard to alleged irregularities being committed in the state information commission in the government of Uttar Pradesh.
2-Provide the reason as required under subsction 1 d of the section 4 of the Right to Information Act 2005 to close the aforementioned grievance arbitrarily without reaching on any conclusion even when the matter concerns the deep rooted irregularities.
3-Provide the name and designation of the staff under whose direction aforementioned grievnce was closed arbitrarily evidently jansunwai portal is monitored by the chief minister office of the government of Uttar Pradesh.
4- Please provide detail if any enquiry to check irregularities in the Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission is under progress.
* Concerned PIO Nodal Officer
Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))
Registration Number DOCMO/R/2021/60661
Name Yogi M P Singh
Date of Filing 25/08/2021
Status RTI REQUEST RECEIVED as on 25/08/2021
Nodal Officer Details
Telephone Number 9454412725
Email-ID sunil.12725@gov.in
संदर्भ संख्या : 60000210110527 , दिनांक - 25 Aug 2021 तक की स्थिति
आवेदनकर्ता का विवरण :
शिकायत संख्या:-60000210110527
आवेदक का नाम-Yogi M P Singhविषय-Instead of show of, we must take genuine steps to curb the steep hike in growing corruption. An institution invites the removal of objections from appellant through notice, but UPSIC returns the entire appeal through a parrot note. Whether it is not a mismanagement of a constitutional institution? Mismanagement and corruption in the working of Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission. Subject-Objection made by the commission in the appeal dated 23/07/2020 received in the office of Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission on 30/07/2020 through a communication dated 05/10/2020 received by the applicant on 31/10/2020 is arbitrary and illegal. The objections made by the Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission are as follows. 1-Appellant has not attached a copy of R.T.I. Communique submitted under subsection 1 section 6 of Right Information Act 2005 to the second appeal dated 23/07/2020. 2- Appellant has not attached a copy of R.T.I. first appeal submitted under subsection 1 section 19 of Right Information Act 2005 to the second appeal dated 23/07/2020. 3- Appellant did not verify that no appeal submitted under subsection 3 of section 19 earlier in the same matter. Replies of the applicant before the accountable public functionaries including State Information Commission of Uttar Pradesh are as follows respectively. 1-The submission 2 of the appeal dated 23/07/2020 contains the status and application of R.T.I. Communique registered on the portal of the Government of Uttar Pradesh as forwarded by the department of justice under subsection 3 of section 6 of R.T.I. Act of 2005. Vide attached document to the representation. 2- The submission 3 of the appeal dated 23/07/2020 contains the status and application of R.T.I. appeal submitted under subsection 1 of section 19 of the Right to Information Act 2005 registered on the portal of the Government of Uttar Pradesh. Vide attached document to the representation. 3-Appellant can not verify that he submitted an appeal before the commission before appeal dated 23/07/2020 in the same matter as it is subject of commission. But appellant affirms that no appeal, he submitted before the Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission before the appeal dated 23/07/2020 in the same matter. Undoubtedly the Government has passed the august act, but the information is not accessible to citizens because of arbitrariness, tyranny and corruption in the government machinery. O God help me in my pious approach, betterment to society.
विभाग -शिकायत श्रेणी -
नियोजित तारीख-10-08-2021शिकायत की स्थिति-
स्तर -जनपद स्तरपद -जिलाधिकारी
प्राप्त रिमाइंडर-
प्राप्त फीडबैक -दिनांक12-08-2021 को फीडबैक:-महोदय जब प्रकरण राज्य सूचना आयोग उत्तर प्रदेश से है तो और खुद मंडी समित चौकी इंचार्ज बाली मौर्या ने भी अपने अपने रिपोर्ट में कहा है और उसी रिपोर्ट के आधार पर शिकायत को बंद कर दिए जब खुद हिंदी में लिखे है की आवेदक आवेदक द्वारा राज्य सूचना आयोग के कुप्रबंधन और भ्र्ष्टाचार की शिकायत प्रार्थी द्वारा किया गया है इसलिए प्रार्थना पत्र का निस्तारण राज्य सूचना आयोग के वरिष्ठ अधिकारी द्वारा कराया जाना समीचीन होगा और हास्यास्पद यह है की आप द्वारा द्वारा इस रिपोर्ट को आधार बना कर शिकायत निस्तारित लिया गया जो की भ्रष्टाचार को पोषित करने वाला है कृपया भूल का परिमार्जन करे
फीडबैक की स्थिति -फीडबैक प्राप्त
संलग्नक देखें -Click here
नोट- अंतिम कॉलम में वर्णित सन्दर्भ की स्थिति कॉलम-5 में अंकित अधिकारी के स्तर पर हुयी कार्यवाही दर्शाता है!
अधीनस्थ द्वारा प्राप्त आख्या :
क्र.स. सन्दर्भ का प्रकार आदेश देने वाले अधिकारी आदेश/आपत्ति दिनांक आदेश/आपत्ति आख्या देने वाले अधिकारी आख्या दिनांक आख्या स्थिति संलगनक
1 अंतरित लोक शिकायत अनुभाग -3(, मुख्यमंत्री कार्यालय ) 26-07-2021 कृपया शीघ्र नियमानुसार कार्यवाही किये जाने की अपेक्षा की गई है। जिलाधिकारी-मिर्ज़ापुर, 10-08-2021 अधीनस्थ अधिकारी के स्तर पर निस्तारित निक्षेपित
2 अंतरित जिलाधिकारी ( ) 26-07-2021 नियमनुसार आवश्यक कार्यवाही करें वरिष्ठ /पुलिस अधीक्षक-मिर्ज़ापुर,पुलिस 10-08-2021 महोदय, जांच आख्या संलग्न कर सादर अवलोकनार्थ प्रेषित है। निस्तारित
3 आख्या वरिष्ठ /पुलिस अधीक्षक (पुलिस ) 26-07-2021 आवश्यक कार्यवाही करने का कष्ट करें एवं आख्या प्रेषित करें क्षेत्राधिकारी / सहायक पुलिस आयुक्त-क्षेत्राधिकारी , नगर ,जनपद-मिर्ज़ापुर 10-08-2021 महोदय , जांच आख्या सादर अवलोकनार्थ प्रेषित है । निस्तारित
4 आख्या क्षेत्राधिकारी / सहायक पुलिस आयुक्त (पुलिस ) 28-07-2021 पृष्ठांकित कृपया आख्या 05 दिवस मे प्रेेषित करना सुनिश्चित करे, प्रकऱण निस्तारण समय से न होने की दशा मे प्र0नि0 व सम्बन्धित जांच कर्ता का उत्तरदायित्व होगा । थानाध्यक्ष/प्रभारी निरीक्षक-कोतवाली कटरा,जनपद-मिर्ज़ापुर,पुलिस 09-08-2021 आख्या संलग्न कर अवलोकनार्थ प्रेषित है। निस्तारित
Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2021/34607
Grievance Concerns To
Name Of Complainant
Yogi M P Singh
Date of Receipt
14/07/2021
Received By Ministry/Department
Uttar Pradesh
Grievance Description
Instead of show of, we must take genuine steps to curb the steep hike in growing corruption.
An institution invites the removal of objections from appellant through notice, but UPSIC returns the entire appeal through a parrot note. Whether it is not a mismanagement of a constitutional institution?
Mismanagement and corruption in the working of Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission.
Subject-Objection made by the commission in the appeal dated 23/07/2020 received in the office of Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission on 30/07/2020 through a communication dated 05/10/2020 received by the applicant on 31/10/2020 is arbitrary and illegal.
The objections made by the Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission are as follows.
1-Appellant has not attached a copy of R.T.I. Communique submitted under subsection 1 section 6 of Right Information Act 2005 to the second appeal dated 23/07/2020.
2- Appellant has not attached a copy of R.T.I. first appeal submitted under subsection 1 section 19 of Right Information Act 2005 to the second appeal dated 23/07/2020.
3- Appellant did not verify that no appeal submitted under subsection 3 of section 19 earlier in the same matter.
Replies of the applicant before the accountable public functionaries including State Information Commission of Uttar Pradesh are as follows respectively.
1-The submission 2 of the appeal dated 23/07/2020 contains the status and application of R.T.I. Communique registered on the portal of the Government of Uttar Pradesh as forwarded by the department of justice under subsection 3 of section 6 of R.T.I. Act of 2005. Vide attached document to the representation.
2- The submission 3 of the appeal dated 23/07/2020 contains the status and application of R.T.I. appeal submitted under subsection 1 of section 19 of the Right to Information Act 2005 registered on the portal of the Government of Uttar Pradesh. Vide attached document to the representation.
3-Appellant can not verify that he submitted an appeal before the commission before appeal dated 23/07/2020 in the same matter as it is subject of commission.
But appellant affirms that no appeal, he submitted before the Uttar Pradesh State Information Commission before the appeal dated 23/07/2020 in the same matter.
Undoubtedly the Government has passed the august act, but the information is not accessible to citizens because of arbitrariness, tyranny and corruption in the government machinery. O God help me in my pious approach, betterment to society.
Grievance Document
Current Status
Case closed
Date of Action
11/08/2021
Remarks
अधीनस्थ अधिकारी के स्तर पर निस्तारित महोदय, जांच आख्या संलग्न कर सादर अवलोकनार्थ प्रेषित है महोदय , जांच आख्या सादर अवलोकनार्थ प्रेषित है आख्या संलग्न कर अवलोकनार्थ प्रेषित है
Reply Document
Rating
1
Poor
Rating Remarks
How can it be justified that the matter concerns the Uttar Pradesh state information commission and chauki in-charge stated in its report but concerned staffs disposed How can it be justified that Uttar Pradesh state information commission may return the appeal of the appellant arbitrarily on the false and fabricated ground which is quite obvious from the post and most surprising is that they are submitting arbitrary reply to the grievances forwarded to them and most surprising is that a government itself showing a lackadaisical approach to redress the grievances. Our motive to introduce the right to Information act 2005 was to promote transparency and accountability in the public offices but it seems that because of corruption our public functionaries are failed to implement The Right to Information act 2005 properly which is the root cause wrongdoer Public Information officers are not being punished Under The Right to Information act 2005 and no information is being made available.
Officer Concerns To
Officer Name
Shri Bhaskar Pandey
Officer Designation
Joint Secretary
Contact Address
Chief Minister Secretariat Room No.321 U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow
Email Address
bhaskar.12214@gov.in
Contact Number
2226350
Tags:
R.T.I.
महोदय जब प्रकरण राज्य सूचना आयोग उत्तर प्रदेश से है तो और खुद मंडी समित चौकी इंचार्ज बाली मौर्या ने भी अपने अपने रिपोर्ट में कहा है और उसी रिपोर्ट के आधार पर शिकायत को बंद कर दिए जब खुद हिंदी में लिखे है की आवेदक आवेदक द्वारा राज्य सूचना आयोग के कुप्रबंधन और भ्र्ष्टाचार की शिकायत प्रार्थी द्वारा किया गया है इसलिए प्रार्थना पत्र का निस्तारण राज्य सूचना आयोग के वरिष्ठ अधिकारी द्वारा कराया जाना समीचीन होगा और हास्यास्पद यह है की आप द्वारा द्वारा इस रिपोर्ट को आधार बना कर शिकायत निस्तारित लिया गया जो की भ्रष्टाचार को पोषित करने वाला है कृपया भूल का परिमार्जन करे
ReplyDeleteUP POLICE IS CLUELESS ABOUT NRI LAW, THEY RUINED MY DAY
ReplyDeleteUttar Pradesh police is not only careless about the NRI law, but it is careless about entire law because they only follow their own law. There is no supremacy of the law in the state. In this Era, corruption is legalized in this country.
ReplyDelete