google-site-verification: google652ee2e18330a276.html Yogi as anti-corruption crusader: Lucknow police is not only shielding culprits but also the Jaguar Car used to commit the offence punishable under IPC 307

Thursday, 22 April 2021

Lucknow police is not only shielding culprits but also the Jaguar Car used to commit the offence punishable under IPC 307

 







Registration Number PCLKO/R/2021/60116

Name Ashutosh Singh

Date of Filing 07/04/2021

Status REQUEST DISPOSED OF as on 22/04/2021

Reply :- please find the attachment.

View Document

  Nodal Officer Details  

Telephone Number 9454401503

Email-ID jansuchanalko@gmail.com

Public Authority Details :-Online RTI Request Form Details
   
* Public Authority POLICE COMMISSIONER OFFICE LUCKNOW
   
Personal Details of RTI Applicant:-
Registration Number PCLKO/R/2021/60116
Date of Filing 07/04/2021
* Name Ashutosh Singh
Gender Male
* Address APC State II Literacy house
Pincode 226001
Country India
State Uttar Pradesh
Status Details not provided
Pincode Literate
Phone Number Details not provided
Mobile Number +91-8687593247
Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
Request Details :-
Citizenship Indian
* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No
((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )
* Description of Information Sought The matter concerns the F.I.R. lodged on 23/03/2021 in the Krishna Nagar police station District- Lucknow under section 307 of the India Penal Code. Your applicant Ashutosh Singh S/O Mr Narendra Pratap Singh APC State II A  Literacy House Kanpur Road Lucknow.  Four individuals of criminal mind attacked the applicant with iron rods assaulted on the head and description of Jaguar Car along with the registration number used by criminals is available to the police. Moreover, a second assault was committed on 29/03/2021 on the applicant just after one week and the first information report was lodged in the Sarojni Nagar police station District Lucknow under section 352 and 427 of the Indian penal cade. 
 Provide the following information pointwise as sought. 
1-Provide the further action detail in the aforementioned lodged F.I.R. in the Krishna Nagar police station as well as in the Sarojni Nagar police station.
2-Provide offenders details if any arrested by the police.
3-Provide action taken regarding vehicle used by offenders as details available to police. 
* Concerned PIO SHRAVAN KUMAR SINGH
Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB)) Supporting document not provided
Registration Number PCLKO/A/2021/60046
Name Ashutosh Singh
Date of Filing 22-04-2021
Request filed with POLICE COMMISSIONER OFFICE LUCKNOW
 Contact Details  
Telephone Number 9454401503
Email-ID jansuchanalko@gmail.com

Registration Number PCLKO/A/2021/60046
Name Ashutosh Singh
Date of Filing 22/04/2021
Status RTI APPEAL RECEIVED as on 22/04/2021
  Nodal Officer Details  
Telephone Number 9454401503
Email-ID jansuchanalko@gmail.com
Online RTI Appeal Form Details
Public Authority Details :-
   
* Public Authority POLICE COMMISSIONER OFFICE LUCKNOW
   
Personal Details of Appellant:-
Request Registration Number PCLKO/R/2021/60116
Request Registration Date 07/04/2021
* Name Ashutosh Singh
Gender Male
* Address APC State II Literacy house , Kanpur Road
Pincode 226001
Country India
State Uttar Pradesh
Status Details not provided
Pincode Literate
Phone Number Details not provided
Mobile Number +91-8687593247
Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
Appeal Details :-
Citizenship Indian
* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No
* Ground For Appeal Provided Incomplete,Misleading or False Information
* PIO of Public Authority approached SHRAVAN KUMAR SINGH
PIO Order/Decision Number Details not provided
* PIO Order/Decision Date
((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )
* Prayer or Relief Sought
Provide the following information pointwise as sought. 
1-Provide the further action detail in the aforementioned lodged F.I.R. in the Krishna Nagar police station as well as in the Sarojini Nagar police station.
2-Provide offenders details if any arrested by the police.
3-Provide action taken regarding vehicle used by offenders as details available to police.  
State Public Information Concerned made available aforementioned sought information online today i.e. 22/04/2021 as follows. 
Under each point, you provided information as follows.
Applicant cum victim Ashutosh Singh lodged F.I.R. on 13/03/2021 registered by police as Litigation number-124/2021 under section 307 of Indian Penal Code. Police are carrying out investigations and collecting evidence. 
Right to Information Act 2005 was brought up by the government of India to promote transparency and accountability in the working of the public authority. Under the first point   it is categorically mentioned Krishna Nagar police station as well as in the Sarojini Nagar police station. 
Here your misleading report is only concerned with Krishna Nagar Police station not Sarojini Nagar police station which means the provided information is incomplete. 
Applicant itself identified an offender in police station Krishna Nagar out of four suspects but it seems police left him arbitrarily by taking bribes otherwise why not provided the detail of that offener under pont 2. 

Under point 3 they did not take any action in regard to Jaguar car used by culprits while the registration detail is available to them quite obviously from the F.I.R. Police did not provide any information as sought by the information seeker because it is more interested in shielding the criminal elements because of the corruption. 
Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB)) Supporting document not provided

5 comments:

  1. Applicant itself identified an offender in police station Krishna Nagar out of four suspects but it seems police left him arbitrarily by taking bribes otherwise why not provided the detail of that offener under pont 2.
    When the matter was published in the vernacular daily in detail and entire Lucknow is well apprised with the fact then think about the police is shielding offenders and the Jaguar car used by them. Such is the law and order in the state capital.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Why did Lucknow police not provide information under right to information act 2005 quite obvious from the content of the post in which they did not provide a single point information. No information was made available by the public information officer of the Lucknow police which is a mockery of the provisions of the right to information act 2005 but it is unfortunate no action will be taken against the wrongdoer public information officer because these public information officers have the blessings of senior rank bureaucrats and by colluding with them they withheld the information.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Who are being respected by the Yogi government in Uttar Pradesh is quite obvious that a cricketer was mercilessly beaten by the criminal elements in broad daylight as well as at a public place and he was attacked repeatedly 4 times within 15 days and no culprit was its still arrested one was detained and identified by the victim but he was left by the concerned police by taking the bribe such is the corruption in the Lucknow police.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Corrupt officer's saving criminal there should be immediate action towards them under yogi sir government.i my self identified an accused name uthaw shukla in krishna nagar police station then how he have been left out .3 name already been identified piyush singh ,risabh thakur,uthaw shukla and 4th name till not yet .police knows everything then also hiding criminals it's big shame as a UP cricketer I getting this treatment by police officers.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Right to Information act 2005 was introduced by the government of India to promote transparency and accountability in the working of public authorities but it seems that because of corruption the edge of this weapon has been Blunt which is quite obvious from the lackadaisical approach of the Public Information Officer of the Lucknow police who did not provide a single point information as sought by the information seeker.

    ReplyDelete

Whatever comments you make, it is your responsibility to use facts. You may not make unwanted imputations against any body which may be baseless otherwise commentator itself will be responsible for the derogatory remarks made against any body proved to be false at any appropriate forum.

Junior engineer development authority Mirzapur seeking 1 lakh bribe from Tantrik K. P Singh for construction of a temple in the Mirzapur

  भारत सरकार Government of India कार्मिक, लोक शिकायत और पेंशन मंत्रालय Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions Eng CPGRAMS W...