Same incomplete and misleading information has been uploaded by circle officer city and F.A.A. did not take any action

 

Registration Number SPMZR/A/2024/60002

Name Yogi M P Singh

Date of Filing 09/01/2024

Status APPEAL DISPOSED OF as on 02/03/2024

Reply :- answer to yogi

View Document

  Nodal Officer Details  

Name AJAY KUMAR SINGH

Telephone Number 9454401105

Online RTI Appeal Form Details

Public Authority Details :- 

* Public Authority SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE OFFICE MIRZAPUR  

Personal Details:-

* Name Yogi M P Singh

Gender Male

* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road, Sangmohal post office

Districts Mirzapur

Pincode 231001

State Uttar Pradesh

Educational Status Literate

Phone Number Details not provided

Mobile Number +91-7379105911

Email-ID yogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com

Citizenship Indian

* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No

First Appeal Details u/s 19(1) :-

Registration Number SPMZR/A/2024/60002

Date of Filing 09/01/2024

Concerned Appellate Authority AJAY KUMAR SINGH

Phone No 05442252578

Email Id spmzr-up@nic.in

* Ground For Appeal Refused access to Information Requested

((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )

* Prayer or Relief Sought Registration Number SPMZR/R/2023/80020, Name Yogi M P Singh, Date of Filing 04/10/2023, Status REQUEST DISPOSED OF as on 14/11/2023 The appellant sought following information from the public information officer.

1- Public information officer may provide the name and designation of the staff who are processing the following email sent to the public authority by the information seeker. to: sp-cyber.lu@up.gov.in date: 2 Sept 2023, 09:57

Provided information- The report has been sent already to the cyber cell regarding the aforementioned representation by the investigation officer.  

Submission- The appellant is seeking the name and designation of the staff processing the email application to: sp-cyber.lu@up.gov.in date: 2 Sept 2023, 09:57. 

2- Public information officer may provide the minutes of the proceedings made by the public authority regarding the following email. 

Provided information- The aforementioned information is concerned with the cyber cell Lucknow. 

Submission- If the information is concerned with the cyber cell luck then it had to be transferred to the cyber cell Lucknow under subsection 3 of section 6 of the right to information act 2005 but it was not done.  

3- Public information officer may provide the noting made by the accountable official of the public authority endorsing the following email and the action consequently, also provide next proceeding made in the matter. 

Provided information- The aforementioned information is concerned with the cyber cell Lucknow. 

Submission- If the information is concerned with the cyber cell luck then it had to be transferred to the cyber cell Lucknow under subsection 3 of section 6 of the right to information act 2005 but it was not done. 

4- Public information officer may provide the action details taken by the public authority regarding the email of this information seeker.

This information was denied by the public information officer by taking the recourse of subsection 1J of section 8 of the right to information act 2005 illegally.Subsection1(j) of Section 8 of the right to information act 2005 states that information which relates to personal information the disclosure of which has not relationship to any public activity or interest, or which would cause unwarranted invasion of the privacy of the individual unless the Central Public Information Officer or the State Public Information Officer or the appellate authority, as the case may be, is satisfied that the larger public interest justifies the disclosure of such information: 

Provided that the information, which cannot be denied to the Parliament or a State Legislature shall not be denied to any person.  

5- Public information officer may provide the copy of the documents exchanged by the public authority with the local office of the anti-cyber-crime in the district Mirzapur. This information was also denied by the public information officer by taking the recourse of subsection 1J of section 8 of the right to information act 2005 illegally.

Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))

RTI Application Details u/s 6(1) :-

Registration Number SPMZR/R/2023/80020

Date of Filing 04/10/2023

PIO of Public Authority approached mahesh singh atri

Designation mirzapur

Phone No 9454401105

Email Id addlspopmzr@gmail.com

PIO Order/Decision Number Details not provided

* PIO Order/Decision Date

Email-ID addlspopmzr@gmail.com

Yogi

An anti-corruption crusader. Motive to build a strong society based on the principle of universal brotherhood. Human rights defender and RTI activist. Working for the betterment of societies and as an anti-corruption crusader for more than 25 years. Our sole motive is to raise the voices of weaker and downtrodden sections of the society and safeguard their human rights. Our motive is to promote the religion of universal brotherhood among the various castes communities of different religions. Man is great by his deeds and character.

3 Comments

Your view points inspire us

  1. It is quite obvious that police is not providing any information under right to information act 2005 and root cause of it Uttar Pradesh state information commission is cryptically supporting them. Undoubtedly it is a mockery of the provisions of right to information act 2005 and our account table public staff are not serious to it which is a matter of main concern. Because of corruption police is no more interested to provide information because it will cause adverse impact on their back door income.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Right to information act 2005 was brought up by the government of India to promote transparency and accountability in the working of the public authorities so that corruption in the government machinery maybe curbed. It seems that government functionaries in the state of Uttar Pradesh has thrown right to information act 2005 into a dustbin.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It seems that government of Uttar Pradesh under the regime of saffron brigade put the right to information act 2005 into a heap of garbage.

    ReplyDelete
Previous Post Next Post