PIO of LDA did not provide any information because their corruption will be exposed

 Your RTI Appeal filed successfully.

Please note down the details of registration.

Registration Number :LKDPA/A/2024/60052

Name :Yogi M P Singh

Date of Filing :05-03-2024


 Contact Details  

Telephone Number :7081100326

Email-ID :ldartionline@gmail.com

Online RTI Appeal Form Details

Public Authority Details :-  


Personal Details:-

* Name Yogi M P Singh

Gender Male

* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Jabalpur Road, Sangmohal post office

Districts Mirzapur

Pincode 231001

State Uttar Pradesh

Educational Status Literate

Phone Number Details not provided

Mobile Number +91-7379105911

Email-ID yogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com

Citizenship Indian

* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No

First Appeal Details u/s 19(1) :-

Registration Number LKDPA/A/2024/60052

Date of Filing 05/03/2024

Concerned Appellate Authority Nodal Officer

Phone No Details not provided

Email Id Details not provided

* Ground For Appeal No Response Within the Time Limit

((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )

* Prayer or Relief Sought From the status of the following RTI application the appellant submitted RTI application on 18th January 2024 which was forwarded to the concerned public information officer on 19 January 2024 and it is most unfortunate that the concerned public information officer did not provide any information to the appellant.

Registration Number LKDPA/R/2024/60056, Name Yogi M P Singh,Date of Filing 18/01/2024Status REQUEST FORWARDED TO PIO as on 19/01/2024Concerned PIO Atul Krishna, Designation Deputy Secretary, Phone No 9918001893

Right to Information Act 2005 was introduced by the government of India during the regime of Congress to promote transparency and accountability in the working of public authorities so that growing corruption in the government machinery could be controlled but it seems that corruption has overshadowed the provisions of the information act.

Numerous applications have been submitted under right to information act 2005 to seek information from the Lucknow Development Authority but no information made available by the public information officer by taking the recourse that a committee has been set up by the Lucknow Development Authority and it is most unfortunate near about three years passed since the date of formation of the committee and they are not providing any information to the information seeker in the matter of corruption.

This question arises whether Lucknow Development Authority forms the committee to withhold the information under right to information act 2005 which is quite obvious from the cryptic working style of the public authority.

Think about the fear in the mind of the public information officer that he is not providing any information concerning the committee itself by taking recourse of which he is withholding the information. What type of committee you have formed, you are running away from providing information concerning the committee. Neither public information officer is providing the detail of the personnel who set up the committee nor providing details of the members of the committee.

Undoubtedly there are few honest personnel in the public authority, lucknow development authority but most are corrupt which is the root cause, they are frightened to be exposed if they will provide the information and they are shielding their corrupt staff.

Public Authority advertise its honesty through print and electronic media but when the matter concerns corruption it does not provide information under right to information act 2005.What is the use of such honesty if such honesty may not bring up a change in the society so it is obligatory duty of the honest staff of Lucknow Development Authority to think about some changes which may take place because of their presence in the working of the authority.

I know well that why public information officer is running away from providing information concerned honest staff has been apprised of the fact but it is most unfortunate his proceedings could not press the public information officer to provide information but at this time I will seek shelter in the Uttar Pradesh state information commission just after he will not provide information even after the order of the first affiliate authority.

This is a humble request of the appellant to the first appellate authority to direct the public information officer to provide the information to the appellant. For this appellant shall ever pray to you most respected sir. It has been established that no staff of the Lucknow Development Authority is awarded punishment for the wrongdoings so the appellant cannot request for taking disciplinary action against the public information officer for violating the subsection 1 of section 7 of the right to Information Act 2005.

Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB)) Supporting document not provided

RTI Application Details u/s 6(1) :-

Registration Number LKDPA/R/2024/60056

Date of Filing 18/01/2024

PIO of Public Authority approached Atul Krishna

Designation Deputy Secretary

Phone No 9918001893

Email Id

PIO Order/Decision Number Details not provided

* PIO Order/Decision Date

Registration Number LKDPA/A/2024/60052

Name Yogi M P Singh

Date of Filing 05/03/2024

Status RTI APPEAL RECEIVED as on 05/03/2024

  Nodal Officer Details  

Name Rekha Doharey

Telephone Number 7081100326

Email-ID ldartionline@gmail.com

An anti-corruption crusader. Motive to build a strong society based on the principle of universal brotherhood. Human rights defender and RTI activist. Working for the betterment of societies and as an anti-corruption crusader for more than 25 years. Our sole motive is to raise the voices of weaker and downtrodden sections of the society and safeguard their human rights. Our motive is to promote the religion of universal brotherhood among the various castes communities of different religions. Man is great by his deeds and character.


Your view points inspire us

  1. Lucknow development authority has crossed entire limit of the anarchy quite obvious from its adamant standing of not providing information under right to information act 2005 quite obvious from the fact more than two dozen RTI applications submitted before the public information officer of Lucknow development authority but he did not provide any information to the information seekers even after appeals and direction was given by the first appellate authority.

  2. Lucknow development authority is the bastion of corruption and we have to demolish it. It is most unfortunate that more than hundreds of communications exchanged with the Lucknow development authority but no action taken by the concerned accountable staff in the matter of corruption.

  3. For the working of the Lucknow development authority, it has been proved that there is no rule of law in the working of the Government of Uttar Pradesh.

Previous Post Next Post