Assistant Labour commissioner must adopt logistic approach in the matter to deal with cases instead of prejudiced approach to self defendants


Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2023/0021352

Grievance Concerns To

Name Of Complainant

Sudarshan Maurya

Date of Receipt


Received By Ministry/Department

Uttar Pradesh

Grievance Description

Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2023/0019004

Grievance Concerns To

Name Of Complainant

Sudarshan Maurya

Date of Receipt


Received By Ministry/Department

Uttar Pradesh

The staff of the assistant labour commissioner Mirzapur submitted false, arbitrary and inconsistent report in the aforementioned grievance. Please help the applicant for transparent and accountable proceedings.

The matter concerns the arbitrariness of the Assistant Labour commissioner, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh during the delivery of the quasi-judicial function. An Open court is a normal court where proceedings of the court are conducted. To the extent practical, every person is allowed to watch the proceedings of the court. The concept of hearing in an open court is practiced because it brings transparency in administration of justice. The parties get to know what is happening and inculcate discipline and caution in the minds of all those involved in administering justice.

There must be transparency and accountability in the working of the assistant labour commissioner which must conform to the set up norms of the quasi-judicial proceedings.

The matter concerning the sanctity in the proceedings of the quasi judicial court and from the attached report by the staff of the assistant labour commissioner it is quite obvious that concerned staff did not understand the contents of the submitted complaint.

Whatever submissions are made before the assistant labour commissioner by the applicant is being arbitrarily overlooked by him which is the root cause of such complaints.

Whether it is not showing the arbitrariness and tyranny in the working of the assistant labour commissioner that the applicant is being overlooked in the case by him and submissions of the applicant are being overlooked merely on the ground that applicant is not an advocate he is compelling the applicant that applicant may hire an advocate for the court proceedings. The economical condition of the applicant is not allowing the applicant to hire an advocate.

Why the assistant labour commissioner is preferring an advocate instead of sticking to law points is itself a matter of concern.

Whether it is justified to refuse to take the representation of the applicant who is appearing in person before the court to represent his case as defender. My representation is annexed with this application. The applicant sent his representation to the court by the speed post which scanned-copy is attached to the grievance. Think about the transparency and accountability in the discharge of quasi-judicial function in the state of Uttar Pradesh. Here there is no supremacy of the law but the desires of the presiding officer are supreme. In Indian courts, presiding officers always dislike petitions in person, people arguing their own cases because of cryptic dealing in court proceedings.

In the court of Assistant Labour Commissioner

District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh

Payment of Wages Act, 1936

Case number-P.W./01/2022Prayer- For the appointment of committee to evaluate the losses occurred to the aggrieved respondent because of the dereliction of the plaintiffs.

Honourable sir,

With due respect to the Honourable sir your respondent invites the kind attention of the Honourable Sir to the following points.

1-Respected Sir, your reader refused to take my representation.

2-Respected Sir, I am sending my representation enclosed with two pages original and one attachment with three pictures.

3-In open court hearing, the respondent is free to submit his representations before the court.

O God help me, for this respondent shall ever pray to you, Honourable sir.

Date-16-03-2023 Yours sincerely

Sudarshan Maurya S/O Brijlal Maurya Mobile number-9455024500,

Address-Sohta Adda, Jangi Road, District-Mirzapur, PIN Code-231001

Grievance Document

Current Status

Case closed

Date of Action



अधीनस्थ अधिकारी के स्तर पर निस्तारित अधीनस्थ अधिकारी के स्तर पर निस्तारित Plz. find the attachment

Reply Document




Rating Remarks

Here it is quite obvious that concerned staff of the assistant labour commissioner did not go into the merit of the facts of the complaints. Whether there is no remedy available in the state of Uttar Pradesh against anarchy and lawlessness in the working of the quasi judicial members in the quasi judicial proceedings. If the submissions of the defendant will not be accepted by the quasi judicial officers then he will never be able to defend itself. Here the matter concerns deep irregularity in the quasi judicial proceedings initiated by the assistant labour commissioner in his court and complaint has been made to overcome such a regularity but concerned staff is only telling that proceeding has been initiated against the complainant instead of entertaining the problems being faced by the applicant in self defending the matter which is not impartial dealings of the assistant labour commissioner.

Officer Concerns To

Officer Name

Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary)

Organisation name

Government of Uttar Pradesh

Contact Address

Chief Minister Secretariat , Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow

Email Address

Contact Number


Beerbhadra Singh

To write blogs and applications for the deprived sections who can not raise their voices to stop their human rights violations by corrupt bureaucrats and executives.

Post a Comment

Whatever comments you make, it is your responsibility to use facts. You may not make unwanted imputations against any body which may be baseless otherwise commentator itself will be responsible for the derogatory remarks made against any body proved to be false at any appropriate forum.

Previous Post Next Post