Whether dept. of income tax and state bank of India are not creating anarchy in our society through notice of income tax return

 




Here findings are 1-Mobile number belongs to complainant.

2-Account holder is different which means beneficiary is different. 

But streams of notices of the department will be served to applicant cum complainant. 

If any irregularity is found, complainant will be dragged because of mobile number prima facie. 

Income tax serve the notice on the ground of incomplete information seeking clarification from innocent and gullible people having zero knowledge regarding factual position. 

Following is the report submitted by the department of income tax.

Dear complainant, 

Subject: CPGRAMS grievance reg. No. CBODT/E/2021/17947 

The aforementioned grievance was lodged for issues pertaining to - 

I. Receipt of an SMS on the complainant's mobile number from CMPOC, SBI, Hyderabad The response provided by SBI for this issue is as follows1. “The referred transactions pertain to Salary payment instructions uploaded by Controller of Defence Accounts Jabalpur [Unit: Pay Accounts Office (ORs), Jammu and Kashmir] under Ministry of Defence and the payments were processed for credit to Account No. xxxxxxxx233 (IFSC: Sxxxxxxxxx8). 

2. The mobile number provided by the CDA Jabalpur unit in the referred Payment instructions match with that mentioned in the complaint. However, the name of the Account Holder does not match with the name of the complainant. 

3. As per the arrangement, CMPOC systems triger SMS to the beneficiry/vendor Mobile Number as given in the uploaded payment instructions intimating them of processing of the transactions uploaded by the CDAs. We advise that there is no mechanism at our end to check the correctness of mobile numbers as given in the payment instructions. 

4. We have alerted CDA Jabalpur to verify the mobile number of the beneficiary and arrange for correction, if necessary. 

Therefore, you are requested to pursue the matter with SBI, in case you are not satisfied with the response. 

II. Receipt of an SMS on the complainant's mobile number pertaining to ecampaign for high value financial transactions for F.Y. 2019-20 

Grievance Status for registration number : DEABD/E/2022/44778

Grievance Concerns To
Name Of Complainant
Yogi M. P. Singh
Date of Receipt
16/06/2022
Received By Ministry/Department
Financial Services (Banking Division)
Grievance Description
Financial Services (Banking Division) >> Fraud

Department/Bank/Financial Institute : State Bank of India
-----------------------
The mobile number provided by the CDA Jabalpur unit in the referred Payment instructions match with that mentioned in the complaint. However, the name of the Account Holder does not match with the name of the complainant. Which means lacunae found on the part of State Bank of India but such thing causes trouble to the mobile holder ipso facto from the report of the concerned mandate. Such mismanagement and negligence on the part of S.B.I. causing trouble to the innocent and gullible people which must be curbed in the wide public interest. Here findings are only saying that subsequent result is nil because such negligence undoubtedly creates a loophole for wrongdoers taken negligently by the concerned mandate.
Grievance Status for registration number : CBODT/E/2021/17947 Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant
Yogi M. P. Singh Date of Receipt 04/07/2021 Received By Ministry/Department Central Board of Direct Taxes (Income Tax) More details are attached herewith.
Fraud accounts are opened and anonymous mobile numbers are registered with them and then a hefty sum of money is transacted and notice of income tax is served to mobile number holders. The matter is also sent to PMO
Here findings are 1-Mobile number belongs to complainant.

2-Account holder is different which means beneficiary is different.

But streams of notices of the department will be served to applicant cum complainant.

If any irregularity is found, the complainant will be dragged because of mobile number prima facie.

Income tax serves the notice on the ground of incomplete information seeking clarification from innocent and gullible people having zero knowledge regarding factual position.
Following message came on my mobile No. 9794760348 initially service provider was Airtel now ported to B.S.N.L.

Name:
Number: BP-SBI CMP
Content:
Txn with Ref No. 600155367144 for Rs. 109147.00 in A/c XXX0233 received from CDA JABALPUR is taken up for Processing on 30-06-2021. SBI
Grievance Document
Current Status
Grievance received   
Date of Action
16/06/2022
Officer Concerns To
Forwarded to
Financial Services (Banking Division)
Officer Name
SHRI PANKAJ SHARMA (JOINT SECRETARY)
Organisation name
Financial Services (Banking Division)
Contact Address
Room No.44, 3rd Floor,Jeevan Deep Building Building, Sansad Marg New Delhi
Email Address
sobo3-dfs@nic.in
Contact Number
01123346785

1 Comments

Whatever comments you make, it is your responsibility to use facts. You may not make unwanted imputations against any body which may be baseless otherwise commentator itself will be responsible for the derogatory remarks made against any body proved to be false at any appropriate forum.

  1. 3. As per the arrangement, CMPOC systems triger SMS to the beneficiry/vendor Mobile Number as given in the uploaded payment instructions intimating them of processing of the transactions uploaded by the CDAs. We advise that there is no mechanism at our end to check the correctness of mobile numbers as given in the payment instructions.

    4. We have alerted CDA Jabalpur to verify the mobile number of the beneficiary and arrange for correction, if necessary.

    Therefore, you are requested to pursue the matter with SBI, in case you are not satisfied with the response.

    ReplyDelete
Previous Post Next Post