High court ordered for civil proceedings but Lucknow police disobeyed order and provided possession of land and house Dinesh

Your RTI Appeal filed successfully.
Please note down the details of registration.
Registration Number PCLKO/A/2022/60033
Name Yogi M P Singh
Date of Filing 08-04-2022
Request filed with POLICE COMMISSIONER OFFICE LUCKNOW
 Contact Details  
Telephone Number 9454401089
Email-ID jansuchanalko@gmail.com
Online RTI Appeal Form Details
Public Authority Details :-
   
* Public Authority POLICE COMMISSIONER OFFICE LUCKNOW
   
Personal Details:-
* Name Yogi M P Singh
Gender Male
* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Shri Laxmi Narayan Baikunth Mahadev Mandir, Jabalpur Road
Pincode 231001
State Uttar Pradesh
Educational Status Literate
Phone Number Details not provided
Mobile Number +91-7379105911
Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
Citizenship Indian
* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No
First Appeal Details u/s 19(1) :-
Registration Number PCLKO/A/2022/60033
Date of Filing 08/04/2022
Concerned Appellate Authority Nodal Officer
Phone No Details not provided
Email Id Details not provided
* Ground For Appeal Provided Incomplete,Misleading or False Information
((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )
* Prayer or Relief Sought Registration Number PCLKO/R/2022/80039 Name Yogi M P Singh Date of Filing 02/03/2022 Status REQUEST DISPOSED OF as on 31/03/2022For more feedback, vide attached document to the appeal representation. 
Right to information act 2005 was introduced by the government of India to promote transparency and accountability in the working of the public authority and here assistant public information officer Cantt repeatedly provided information that Ashiana police acted under the direction of the court as Anuradha Singh name changed Aradhana Singh submitted petition before the court under sub section 3 of section 156 of the criminal panel code and court give the direction to register first information report in the matter after investigation. 
This implies that Ashiana police station which  was the party number 3 in the high court case overlooked the verdict passed by the Lucknow bench are the high court of Judicature at Allahabad and followed the direction of the lower court by overlooking the verdict of the High court which was binding on  the Ashiana police, home secretary and commissioner of police as home secretary was the party number 1, commissioner of police was the party number 2 and Ashiana police was the party number 3 in the case in which honourable high court of Judicature at Allahabad decided the verdict. 
Consequently entire police personnel who abused their post and position must be subjected to the penal proceedings of the law of land for violating verdict passed by the Lucknow bench of the high court of judicature at Allahabad. Undoubtedly lower court Lucknow had passed the order to register the first information report but it did not say to overlook the verdict delivered by the Lucknow bench off the High court of judicature at Allahabad and this blunder was done by Ashiana police itself. Now the time has come when the Lucknow police may correct stand by taking the action against the wrongdoer police personnel who committed wrong by disobeying the order passed by the Lucknow bench of the high court of judicature at Allahabad. Think about the gravity of situation that when a single fish can make dirty entire water of the pond then think about a Syndicate of corrupt police personnel is working in the department of police in the commissionerate Lucknow so what would be outcome if no  action will be taken by the accountable public functionaries in the office of the public authority police at Lucknow. Think about the gravity situation that concerned police personnel took under teeth the direction of the Lucknow bench of the high court of Judicature at Allahabad because of the corruption prevalent in the office of the public authority. 
Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))
RTI Application Details u/s 6(1) :-
Registration Number PCLKO/R/2022/80039
Date of Filing 02/03/2022
PIO of Public Authority approached AJAY KUMAR
Designation ADDITIONAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
Phone No 9454401089
Email Id
PIO Order/Decision Number Details not provided
* PIO Order/Decision Date

Registration Number PCLKO/A/2022/60033
Name Yogi M P Singh
Date of Filing 08/04/2022
Status RTI APPEAL RECEIVED as on 08/04/2022
  Nodal Officer Details  
Telephone Number 9454401089
Email-ID jansuchanalko@gmail.com

Registration Number PCLKO/R/2022/80039
Name Yogi M P Singh
Date of Filing 02/03/2022
Status REQUEST DISPOSED OF as on 31/03/2022
Reply :- file attached.
View Document
  Nodal Officer Details  
Telephone Number 9454401089
Email-ID jansuchanalko@gmail.com
Online RTI Request Form Details
Public Authority Details :-
   
* Public Authority POLICE COMMISSIONER OFFICE LUCKNOW
   
Personal Details of RTI Applicant:-
Registration Number PCLKO/R/2022/80039
Date of Filing 02/03/2022
* Name Yogi M P Singh
Gender Male
* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Shri Laxmi Narayan Baikunth Mahadev Mandir, Jabalpur Road
Pincode 231001
State Uttar Pradesh
Educational Status Literate
  Above Graduate
Phone Number Details not provided
Mobile Number +91-7379105911
Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
Citizenship Indian
* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No
RTI Application Details u/s 6(1) :-
((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )

Description of Information Sought The matter concerns the lawlessness and anarchy now dealt in the lower court Lucknow and district judge Lucknow is its administrative head. According to PIO, Police commissioner Lucknow following information is available in district court so they must provide. More detail is attached. 
1- सक्षम न्यायालय द्वारा पारित आदेश जैसा की उपरोक्त ने आदेश किया उपरोक्त आदेश का हिंदी रूपांतरण है प्रतिवादी संख्या चार से सात सीढ़ियों का ताला खोल दे जिससे याचिका कर्ता अनुराधा सिंह बाहर आ सके और सक्षम न्यायालय से उचित उपचार हासिल करे और उसके पश्चात उसे कही भी जाने की स्वतंत्रता होगी महोदय जैसा की उच्च न्यायालय ने आदेश दिया उसका अनुपालन सुनिश्चित करना प्रतिवादी १,२ और तीन की जिम्मेदारी थी और अब संलग्नक एक से स्पस्ट है निबंधन विलेख का संपादन लखनऊ विकास प्राधिकरण द्वारा किया जा चूका है श्री मान जी आप द्वारा किस तरह से अनुराधा सिंह द्वारा माननीय उच्च न्यायालय के अनुपालन सुनिश्चित कराया गया 
२-यदि आप के पास उपरोक्त माननीय उच्च न्यायालय के आदेश के क्रम में कोई सक्षम न्यायालय द्वारा पारित आदेश जो अनुराधा सिंह की मालिकाना हक़ को पुष्ट करता हो तो उस आदेश की प्रति उपलब्ध कराये 
३-यदि अनुराधा सिंह टाइटल सूट नहीं योजित की और गलत तरीके से निबंधन विलेख का संपादन करा लिया तो आप ने क्या कार्यवाही की विवरण उपलब्ध कराये
* Concerned PIO AJAY KUMAR
Designation ADDITIONAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
Phone No 9454401089
Email Id
Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))
Beerbhadra Singh

To write blogs and applications for the deprived sections who can not raise their voices to stop their human rights violations by corrupt bureaucrats and executives.

1 Comments

Whatever comments you make, it is your responsibility to use facts. You may not make unwanted imputations against any body which may be baseless otherwise commentator itself will be responsible for the derogatory remarks made against any body proved to be false at any appropriate forum.

  1. Consequently entire police personnel who abused their post and position must be subjected to the penal proceedings of the law of land for violating verdict passed by the Lucknow bench of the high court of judicature at Allahabad. Undoubtedly lower court Lucknow had passed the order to register the first information report but it did not say to overlook the verdict delivered by the Lucknow bench off the High court of judicature at Allahabad and this blunder was done by Ashiana police itself. Now the time has come when the Lucknow police may correct stand by taking the action against the wrongdoer police personnel who committed wrong by disobeying the order passed by the Lucknow bench of the high court of judicature at Allahabad.

    ReplyDelete
Previous Post Next Post