Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2021/39891
Grievance Concerns To
Name Of Complainant
Yogi M P Singh
Date of Receipt
03/08/2021
Received By Ministry/Department
Uttar Pradesh
Grievance Description
The matter concerns the non-providing registration number to the information seeker even when R.T.I. Fee has been paid to the online R.T.I. Portal of the government of Uttar Pradesh. 31 Jul 2021 TO TRANSFER-INB UPCYBER TREASURY RTI210048088IK0BFAEYW9TRANSFER TO 310.00Sir more than 72 hours passed but unfortunately concerned did not provide the registration number. Whether it is justified? Undoubtedly, if they are not interested to provide registration number of the submitted online R.T.I. application, then they must refund the paid R.T.I. fee for the communique as required under the law. The staffs of the online R.T.I. Portal of the government of Uttar Pradesh have been already informed regarding the problem, but unfortunately they did not take the email representation seriously showing their insolence and reluctant approach to the duty. For more details, vide attached PDF document to the representation.
Grievance Document
Current Status
Grievance received
Date of Action
03/08/2021
Officer Concerns To
Forwarded to
Uttar Pradesh
Officer Name
Shri Bhaskar Pandey
Officer Designation
Joint Secretary
Contact Address
Chief Minister Secretariat Room No.321 U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow
Email Address
bhaskar.12214@gov.in
Contact Number
2226350
Gmail Beerbhadra Singh <myogimpsingh@gmail.com>
Processing to submit R.T.I. Communique surprisingly stopped after the payment of the RTI fee quite obvious from the screenshot.
2 messages
Beerbhadra Singh <myogimpsingh@gmail.com> Sat, Jul 31, 2021 at 8:42 AM
To: pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, sec.sic@up.nic.in, lscm700@gmail.com, RTI-Online <onlinertihelpline.up@gov.in>, cmup@up.nic.in, hgovup@up.nic.in, lokayukta@hotmail.com, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, uphrclko@yahoo.co.in, csup@up.nic.in
Error message displayed on the screen of the computer as session expired. Thus process no further moved on.
Portal of Government of Uttar Pradesh inviting online applications from information seekers is in dilapidated state.
Most revered Sir –Your applicant invites the kind attention of Hon’ble Sir with due respect to the following submissions as follows.
1-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that 51A. Fundamental duties It shall be the duty of every citizen of India (a) to abide by the Constitution and respect its ideals and institutions, the National Flag and the National Anthem;(h) to develop the scientific temper, humanism and the spirit of inquiry and reform;
(i) to safeguard public property and to abjure violence;
(j) to strive towards excellence in all spheres of individual and collective activity so that the nation constantly rises to higher levels of endeavour and achievement.
2-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that following information from the public authority Lucknow Development Authority, but process could not complete after fee payment.
This R.T.I. communique is submitted on behalf of the Dinesh Pratap Singh S/O Angad Prasad Singh who is the claimant of the plot of the land quite obvious from the order passed by the Lucknow bench of the High court of judicature at Allahabad in the Writ Petition Number 135 HC Year 2006.
In the Writ Petition Number 135 HC Year 2006 filed in the Lucknow bench of the High court of Judicature at Allahabad filed by Anuradha Singh also named Guddi also named Aradhana Singh through her mother Beena Singh wife of Brijraj Singh also Beena Singh wife of Netrpal Singh. Whether in the same matter, to get remedy from various redressal bodies and get public aid by changing the name is not illegal? In the aforementioned writ, Anuradha Singh was directed by the High court of judicature to seek civil remedy from competent authority by filing a title suit.
1-L.D.A. may provide the detail of title suit filed by multi-named lady Anuradha Singh in the record of L.D.A. Guddi Singh including the designation, name of the public staff who executed it with posting detail.
2-L.D.A. may provide the copy of the order passed by the competent court decided the title suit of the Anuradha Singh in the compliance of the High court order in the Writ Petition Number 135 HC Year 2006.
3-L.D.A. may provide the detail of the posting of the staffs executed the registry of plots to allottees with designation and name so that accountability may be fixed.
3-It is submitted before the Hon’ble Sir that screenshot of the fee payment online is attached to the grievance so registration number may be made available the applicant as soon as possible.
Sir factual position is that our corrupt public functionaries adopt a step motherly approach with the Right to Information Act 2005 as it aims to contain corruption which impedes their corrupt dealings. That is why they keep the portal inviting applications under right to information act 2005 non-functional through their cryptic working styles. The weird treatment of online portals causes resentment among the large section of people seeking information against the unlawful activities of the corrupt public staff.
THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT, 2005 No. 22 of 2005 [15th June, 2005.] An Act to provide for setting out the practical regime of right to information for citizens to secure access to information under the control of public authorities, in order to promote transparency and accountability in the working of every public authority, the constitution of a Central Information Commission and State Information Commissions and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. WHEREAS the Constitution of India has established democratic Republic; AND WHEREAS democracy requires an informed citizenry and transparency of information which are vital to its functioning and also to contain corruption and to hold Governments and their instrumentalities accountable to the governed;
खुदा भी आसमाँ से जब जमी पे देखता होगा |
इस मेरे प्यारे देश को क्या हुआ सोचता होगा||
This is a humble request of your applicant to you, Hon’ble Sir that how can it be justified to withhold public services arbitrarily and promote anarchy, lawlessness and chaos arbitrarily by making the mockery of law of land? There is need of the hour to take harsh steps against the wrongdoer to win the confidence of citizenry and strengthen the democratic values for healthy and prosperous democracy. For this, your applicant shall ever pray for you, Hon’ble Sir.
Date-31/07/2021 Yours sincerely
Yogi M. P. Singh, Mobile number-7379105911,
Mohalla- Surekapuram, Jabalpur Road, District-Mirzapur, Uttar Pradesh, Pin code-231001.
Beerbhadra Singh <myogimpsingh@gmail.com> Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 8:32 AM
To: pmosb <pmosb@pmo.nic.in>, supremecourt <supremecourt@nic.in>, presidentofindia@rb.nic.in, sec.sic@up.nic.in, lscm700@gmail.com, RTI-Online <onlinertihelpline.up@gov.in>, cmup@up.nic.in, hgovup@up.nic.in, lokayukta@hotmail.com, urgent-action <urgent-action@ohchr.org>, uphrclko@yahoo.co.in, csup@up.nic.in
31 Jul 2021 TO TRANSFER-INB UP
CYBER TREASURY RTI210048088IK0
BFAEYW9
TRANSFER TO 3
10.00
Sir more than 72 hours passed but unfortunately concerned did not provide the registration number. Whether it is justified?
Undoubtedly, if they are not interested to provide registration number of the submitted online R.T.I. application, then they must refund the paid R.T.I. fee for the communique as required under the law.
[Quoted text hidden]
Tags:
R.T.I.
Sir factual position is that our corrupt public functionaries adopt a step motherly approach with the Right to Information Act 2005 as it aims to contain corruption which impedes their corrupt dealings. That is why they keep the portal inviting applications under right to information act 2005 non-functional through their cryptic working styles. The weird treatment of online portals causes resentment among the large section of people seeking information against the unlawful activities of the corrupt public staff.
ReplyDelete