Ashok Maurya alleged that S.D.M. could not process representation under section 24 pending since June 2024 reflects corruption


 

Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2024/0017032

Grievance Concerns To

Name Of Complainant

Ashok Kumar Maurya

Date of Receipt

08/03/2024

Received By Ministry/Department

Uttar Pradesh

Grievance Description

This application concerns the working of the sub divisional magistrate sadar, district-Mirzapur who could not direct the concerned lekhpal and revenue inspector to do the pakki Pai Mise of the land to destroy the root of controversy. In the year 2022, entire formalities completed by the deceased father of the applicant and treasury challan of Rs.1000 was also made but what was the loss is covered under carpet.


वरासत बाद सं0 20231619901000003036 रा0नि0 जिगना के आदेश दिनांक 20.05.2023 ग्राम बिहसडा खुर्द के खाता सं0 62,49 के मृतक खातेदार मुरलीधर के स्थान पर धन देवी पत्नी मुरलीधर व ओमनरायन मौर्य व श्यामनरायन मौर्या व संतोष कुमार व अशोक कुमार मौर्य पुत्रगण स्व0 मुरलीधर नि० बिहसडा खुर्द का नाम बतौर वारिस दर्ज हो। ह0रा0नि0दि0 20.05.2023


Inheritance case number- 20231619901000003036, According to order of Revenue Inspector Jigna dated 20.05.2023, in place of deceased Khatedar Murlidhar of account no. 62, 49 of village Bihasda Khurd, the name of Dhan Devi wife Murlidhar and Omnarayan Maurya and Shyamnarayan Maurya and Santosh Kumar and Ashok Kumar Maurya sons of late Murlidhar resident of Bihasada Khurd should be recorded as heirs. Signed by Revenue Inspector on 20.05.2023


An application under article 51A of the constitution of India to make enquiry regarding the inaction of the tehsil Sadar in carrying out pai mise of the transitory land of the family of the applicant in which other applicants are the co shareholders quite obvious from the representation addressed to the district magistrate Mirzapur attached as the first page of the attached PDF documents consisting of 16 pages to this representation of the applicant.


Short submissions of the applicant or as follows.

1-The first page is the representation of the applicants against land describing by the husband of gram pradhan of the village panchayat by making road in araji number 91 is addressed to the district magistrate Mirzapur. Co share holders are Bechan Maurya S/O Late Bodai, Asaram Maurya S/O Late Bodai, Umesh Maurya S/O Late Bodai, Purushottam Kushwaha S/O Late Ramdev, Moolchand S/O Late Ramdev, Gulab Chand S/O Late Ramdev, Gyanchand S/O Late Ramdev, Kailash Nath S/O Late Ramdev etc. For the more details, vide attached document to the grievance.

2-The second page of the attached PDF document is the payment/challan form made by the deceased father of the applicant of rupees 1000 to the treasury of the government in the State Bank of India. This payment was made to the government for pakki pai mise of the transitory land which details are subsequently available in the PDF document.

3-From page 3 to 11 of the attached PDF document is the representation of the father of the applicant before the sub divisional magistrate Sadar under section 24 of the revenue code 2006 for the pakki Pai Mise of the land. This application was submitted by the deceased father Muralidhar Maurya S/O Sarju Prasad Maurya of the applicant.

4-from the 12th page of the attached PDF document it is quite obvious that husband of the gram pradhan again made attempt to grab the land of the applicant after the sad demise of my father and from the 13th page it is quite obvious that there is no road in the map of the village panchayat Bihasada Khurd in the araji number 91.

5- From the 14th, 15th and 16th page of the attached PDF document which is the online available khatauni on the website of government of Uttar Pradesh showing the current status of the transitory land under dispute created by husband of the gram pradhan of the village panchayat Bihasada Khurd transitory land belonging to the family of the applicant.

This is a humble request of the applicant to take immediate action against the gram pradhan of the village panchayat and direct the concerned staff of the tehsil Sadar to do the pakki Pai Mise of the land who are procrastinating on the issue since 2022.

Grievance Document

Current Status

Grievance received   

Date of Action

08/03/2024

Officer Concerns To

Forwarded to

Uttar Pradesh

Officer Name

Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary)

Organisation name

Uttar Pradesh

Contact Address

Chief Minister Secretariat , Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow

Email Address

bhaskar.12214@gov.in

Contact Number

05222226350

To see the attached document to the grievance, please click on the link

Beerbhadra Singh

To write blogs and applications for the deprived sections who can not raise their voices to stop their human rights violations by corrupt bureaucrats and executives.

4 Comments

Whatever comments you make, it is your responsibility to use facts. You may not make unwanted imputations against any body which may be baseless otherwise commentator itself will be responsible for the derogatory remarks made against any body proved to be false at any appropriate forum.

  1. Whether we are living in a transparent and accountable system or in the era of corruption. Think about the gravity of situation the aggrieved applicant is requesting for the Pai Mise of the agriculture land since June 2022 to the sub divisional magistrate Sadar but he did not take any action in the matter after so long time. It is reflecting the rampant corruption in the working of the public authority tahsil Sadar and it must be taken into cognizance by the pseudo honest people in the state.

    ReplyDelete
  2. If the enquiry will be made government will say that it is a simple process. There is transparency and accountability in the working of the public authority and pay rupees 1000 and get the pai mise of the land accordingly. But what is going on behind the screen common people cannot get justice in this era of corruption.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Undoubtedly, it is a picture of pseudo good governance in the state of Uttar Pradesh where corruption is rampant in the working of the public authority and when the complaints are made against the corrupt working style no action is taken by the accountable staff of the government.

    ReplyDelete
  4. It reflects the corruption in the working of the sub divisional magistrate Sadar which must be corrected by the government of Uttar Pradesh especially Yogi Adityanath chief minister of the Government of Uttar Pradesh.

    ReplyDelete
Previous Post Next Post