Usurping of the ancestral land of Sadhana Tiwari by brothers of deceased father by colluding with the Lekhpal, revenue inspector and tahsildar

Grievance Status for registration number: GOVUP/E/2024/0006071

Grievance Concerns To
Name Of Complainant
Sadhana Tiwari
Date of Receipt
25/01/2024
Received By Ministry/Department
Uttar Pradesh
Grievance Description
The matter concerns usurping of the ancestral land by reaping the vulnerability and immaturity of the applicant does not concern with land dispute, but it is criminal offence must be entertained by police to be instrumental in providing justice to applicant. Here ancestral usurped by the brothers of my deceased father by colluding with the Lekhpal, revenue inspector and tahsildar of tehsil Lalganj, district Mirzapur. Please provide justice to the applicant belonging to vulnerable section and setup excellent precedent so that such may not instigate others to destroy the life an adolescent girl whose parents died at tender age.
Class-I heirs-vi. Daughter of predeceased son. The applicant was class-1 heir in the property of my grandfather who died in 2005 but the property was not inherited in favour of the applicant and the applicant was merely 10 years old at that time. They have cheated my entire property dishonestly by colluding with the staff of Tehsil by reaping the vulnerability of the applicant. The report of the concerned investigation officer is arbitrary and not providing justice to the deprived section. Whether the matter of cheating is entertained by the civil court as being suggested by the concerned investigation officer of the police? All the concerned public staff who supported the offenders committed offence under criminal procedure code and Indian Penal Code must be subjected to the penal proceedings by the police to be instrumental in providing justice to a member of the vulnerable section. Here offenders cheated the property of the applicant by reaping the benefits of vulnerability of the applicant which must be taken into account by the police concerned. Where is the justice for the women and girls in the society?
Grievance Status for registration number: GOVUP/E/2023/0087071, Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant-Sadhana Tiwari, Date of Receipt-31/12/2023, Received By Ministry/Department-Uttar Pradesh
Right to reason is an indispensable part of the sound administrative system, so public information officer must provide the reason for not taking action against offenders under sections 466 467 468 420 195 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. There is no title dispute between the applicant and opposite party, but a criminal conspiracy to deprive the applicant from the property of her father and police is escaping from the matter by taking recourse that the matter is civil which is illogical.
In 2022, the Supreme Court ruled that daughters have the right to inherit their parents’ self-acquired property and any other property of which they are absolute owners, adding that this rule would apply even in cases where the parents of a daughter died intestate before the codification of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956.
Section 4(2) amendment
The Section 4(2) of the Hindu Succession Act did not include agricultural lands under its scope of inheritance. This was revoked in 2005 by adding the right to claim inheritance over agricultural lands. The Act was amended to ensure greater equality between men and women, so that women could exercise their rights on the lands they have been toiling.
Grievance Document
Current Status
Grievance received   
Date of Action
25/01/2024
Officer Concerns To
Forwarded to
Uttar Pradesh
Officer Name
Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary)
Organisation name
Uttar Pradesh
Contact Address
Chief Minister Secretariat , Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow
Email Address
bhaskar.12214@gov.in
Contact Number
05222226350

 Grievance Status for registration number: GOVUP/E/2023/0087071

Grievance Concerns To

Name Of Complainant

Sadhana Tiwari

Date of Receipt

31/12/2023

Received By Ministry/Department

Uttar Pradesh

Grievance Description

The matter concerns land grabbing through cheating does not concern with land dispute, by the brothers of my deceased father by colluding with the Lekhpal, revenue inspector and tahsildar of tehsil Lalganj, district Mirzapur.

Right to reason is an indispensable part of the sound administrative system, so public information officer must provide the reason for not taking action against offenders under sections 466 467 468 420 195 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. There is no title dispute between the applicant and opposite party, but a criminal conspiracy to deprive the applicant from the property of her father and police is escaping from the matter by taking recourse that the matter is civil which is illogical.

In 2022, the Supreme Court ruled that daughters have the right to inherit their parents’ self-acquired property and any other property of which they are absolute owners, adding that this rule would apply even in cases where the parents of a daughter died intestate before the codification of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

Section 4(2) amendment

The Section 4(2) of the Hindu Succession Act did not include agricultural lands under its scope of inheritance. This was revoked in 2005 by adding the right to claim inheritance over agricultural lands. The Act was amended to ensure greater equality between men and women, so that women could exercise their rights on the lands they have been toiling.

Class-I heirs-vi. Daughter of predeceased son

The applicant was class-1 heir in the property of my grandfather who died in 2005 but  the property was not inherited in favour of the applicant and the applicant was merely 10 years old at that time. Which is quite obvious from the last page of the attached PDF document to the grievance. They have cheated my entire property dishonestly by colluding with the staff of Tehsil by reaping the vulnerability of the applicant. Grievance Status for registration number: GOVUP/E/2023/0081714 Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant Sadhana Tiwari Date of Receipt 09/12/2023

Grievance Document

Current Status

Case closed   

Date of Action

23/01/2024

Remarks

प्रकरण में सम्बंधित से आख्या प्राप्त कर निस्तारण हेतु प्रेषित है आख्या संलग्न है महोदय

जांच आख्या संलग्न है

Reply Document

Rating

1

Poor

Rating Remarks

Class-I heirs-vi. Daughter of predeceased son. The applicant was class-1 heir in the property of my grandfather who died in 2005 but the property was not inherited in favour of the applicant and the applicant was merely 10 years old at that time. The report of the concerned investigation officer is arbitrary and not providing justice to the deprived section. Whether the matter of cheating is entertained by the civil court as being suggested by the concerned investigation officer of the police? All the concerned public staff who supported the offenders committed offence under criminal procedure code and Indian Penal Code how must be subjected to the penal proceedings by the police to be instrumental in providing justice to a member of vulnerable section. Here offenders cheated the property of the applicant by reaping the benefits of vulnerability of the applicant which must be taken into account by the police concerned. Where is the justice for the women and girls in the society?

Appeal Details

Appeal Number

Date of Receipt

Appeal Text

Current Status

Officer Concerns To

Officer Name

Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary)

Organisation name

Government of Uttar Pradesh

Contact Address

Chief Minister Secretariat, Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow

Email Address

bhaskar.12214@gov.in

Contact Number

05222226350

To see the attached document to the grievance, please click on the link

Beerbhadra Singh

To write blogs and applications for the deprived sections who can not raise their voices to stop their human rights violations by corrupt bureaucrats and executives.

Post a Comment

Whatever comments you make, it is your responsibility to use facts. You may not make unwanted imputations against any body which may be baseless otherwise commentator itself will be responsible for the derogatory remarks made against any body proved to be false at any appropriate forum.

Previous Post Next Post