8. Exemption from disclosure of information. — (/) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, there shall be no obligation to give any citizen, —
1 | 31/12/19 | 4720 | Processing charge has been debited for the limit sanctioned |
This application is on behalf of Sudarshan Maurya S/O Brijlal Maurya under subsection 1 of section 6 of the Right to Information Act 2005 to seek point wise information from central public information officer, State Bank of India within stipulated time as prescribed under subsection 1 of section 7 of Right to Information Act 2005 as follows.
1-CPIO may provide details regarding charge debited Rs.4720 from the account of Sudarshan Maurya with short description Processing charge has been debited for the limit sanctioned.
2-As reported by S.B.I.as follows-
Further, we confirm that EMI & interest is correctly applied in the accounts maintained by the customer. Account no- 390605420227 is FITL account opened from backend as per govt. guidelines and amount was transferred to CC account. FITL account is closed as on date.
As per the RBI circular dated 22.05.2020, banks are allowed to convert the accumulated interest for the deferment period upto 31.08.2020 into FITL, which shall be repayable by 31.03.2021.
Email Subject should be CC/OD No. - Borrower Name
• In the mail body please mention the following details
• Name of the borrower(s).
• CC/OD account number.
CPIO may provide the detail and copy of the application made by the Sudarshan Maurya in order to get the aforementioned facility and
Account no- 390605420227 is FITL account opened from backend.
3-Please provide a copy of wish to opt-in for the FITL facility offered by the Bank as submitted by Sudarshan Maurya required to be submitted by Sudarshan Maurya to avail aforementioned facility.
4-Please take a glance of following.
4 | 31/10/20 | 681 | Od penal interest applied for irregularity in account |
19 | 30/04/21 | 17/- | Od penal interest applied for irregularity in account |
23 | 31/10/21 | 632/- | Od penal interest applied for irregularity in account |
24 | 30/11/21 | 1286/- | Od penal interest applied for irregularity in account |
30 | 31/12/21 | 260/- | Od penal interest applied for irregularity in account |
Rs.2876 charged from Sudarshan Maurya as Od penal interest applied for irregularity in account.
Please provide detail of Od penal interest.
5-Provide the detail of the staff including name and designation with posting in district Mirzapur who processed the impugned deduction of premium, charges from the Cash Credit Account/CCA.
Enter Registration Number SBILW/A/E/22/00268
Name Yogi M P Singh
Received Date 06/12/2022
Public Authority SBI Lucknow Circle
Status APPEAL DISPOSED OF
Date of action 27/12/2022
Reply :- disposed off wide letter no BOPM-III/RTI/22-23/561 dated 27.12.2022
View Document
First Appellate Authority Details :- GENERAL MANAGER (NETWORK-3)
Phone: 0522-2295133
gm3[dot]lholuc[at]sbi[dot]co[dot]in
Nodal Officer Details :-
Telephone Number 05222295363
Email Id agmpne[dot]lholuc[at]sbi[dot]co[dot]in
Online RTI Appeal Form Details
RTI Appeal Details :-
RTI Appeal Registration number SBILW/A/E/22/00268
Public Authority SBI Lucknow Circle
Personal Details of Appellant:-
Request Registration Number SBILW/R/E/22/00678
Request Registration Date 11/08/2022
Name Yogi M P Singh
Gender Male
Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Mirzapur city, Laxmi Narayan Baikunth Mahadev Mandir
Country India
State Uttar Pradesh
Status Urban
Educational Status Literate
Above Graduate
Phone Number +91-7379105911
Mobile Number +91-7379105911
Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
Appeal Details :-
Citizenship Indian
Is the Requester Below Poverty Line ? No
Ground For Appeal Refused access to Information Requested
CPIO of Public Authority approached RM RBO 7 VARANASI
CPIO's Order/Decision Number Details not provided
CPIO's Order/Decision Date
(Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters)
Prayer or Relief Sought
Herewith appellant sought five-point information from CPIO, State Bank of India which have been denied by CPIO by taking recourse of subsection 1 d and 1 e of section 8 of Right to Information Act 2005 is illegal because appellant is not third party in the matter as This application is on behalf of Sudarshan Maurya S/O Brijlal Maurya under subsection 1 of section 6 of the Right to Information Act 2005 to seek point wise information. Vide first page of attached document in handwriting of Sudarshan Maurya.
Supporting document (only pdf upto 1 MB)