For five years, PIO Collectorate is providing information, but he failed and same parrot reply is being submitted by him and SIC also didn't

 



Registration Number DMOMR/A/2021/60057

Name Yogi M P Singh

Date of Filing 22/10/2021

Status FIRST APPEAL APPLICATION RETURNED TO APPLICANT as on 12/09/2022

Remarks :- Office letter No. 2094 dated 07-07-2022 send to the registered Post.

  Nodal Officer Details  

Name Satya Prakash Singh

Telephone Number 9454416808

Email-ID adm.lr.mi-up@gov.in

Online RTI Appeal Form Details

Public Authority Details :-

   

* Public Authority DISTRICT MAGISTRATE OFFICE MIRZAPUR

   

Personal Details:-

* Name Yogi M P Singh

Gender Male

* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Lakshmi Baikunth Mahadev Mandir, Jabalpur Road

Pincode 231001

State Uttar Pradesh

Educational Status Literate

Phone Number Details not provided

Mobile Number +91-7379105911

Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com

Citizenship Indian

* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No

First Appeal Details u/s 19(1) :-

Registration Number DMOMR/A/2021/60057

Date of Filing 22/10/2021

Concerned Appellate Authority Nodal Officer

Phone No Details not provided

Email Id Details not provided

* Ground For Appeal No Response Within the Time Limit

((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )

* Prayer or Relief Sought Registration Number UPICM/R/2021/60157 Name Yogi M P Singh Date of Filing 13/08/2021 Status REQUEST TRANSFERRED TO OTHER PUBLIC AUTHORITY as on 02/09/2021 Details of Public Autority :- DISTRICT MAGISTRATE OFFICE MIRZAPUR. vide registration number: - DMOMR/R/2021/80054 respectively. For more information, vide attached document to this representation. Short submissions are as follows.1-Public authority Uttar Pradesh Information Commission received aforementioned RTI request on 13 Aug 2021, concerned PIO transferred it to D. M. Mirzapur on 02 Sept 2021 and today is 22 Oct 2021 which means one month 20 days passed but information was not made by the concerned public information officer of the public authority office of District Magistrate Mirzapur within stipulated time 30 days as prescribed under subsection 1 of section 7 of the Right to Information Act 2005 consequently PIO violated the subsection 1 of section 7 of the Right to Information Act 2005 which invites action under disciplinary proceeding awarded to undisciplined staff of the government. In the aforementioned RTI Application, appellant sought six-point information concerning the recovery of pecuniary penalties imposed on the wrongdoer public information officers but it is most unfortunate that his working style is cryptic and mysterious in the matter. From the circumstantial evidence, it is quite obvious that the public information officer itself shields the corrupt activities by concealing the information from the aggrieved people in a cryptic and mysterious way. Think about the gravity of situation that multiple years passed since the date order of recovery was issued by information commission, government of Uttar Pradesh ipso facto obvious from the attached document to the appeal but no recovery was made by concerned and information commission, government of Uttar Pradesh itself not serious about the recovery is not only surprising but reflects anarchy in the working of the information commission, government of Uttar Pradesh itself. Whether any PIO will provide information to the information seekers if there is no fear of penal action imposed under section 20 of the Right to Information Act 2005 by the information commission, government of Uttar Pradesh. Undoubtedly the matter is serious as both the public authorities are failed to provide information under Right to Information Act 2005 concerning the recovery of imposed penalties which means no recovery is made after order of penalty on the erring public information officers. This reflects sheer anarchy in the working of the government of Uttar Pradesh. 

Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))

RTI Application Details u/s 6(1) :-

Registration Number DMOMR/R/2021/80054

Date of Filing 02/09/2021

PIO of Public Authority approached Nodal Officer

Designation Details not provided

Phone No Details not provided

Email Id Details not provided

PIO Order/Decision Number Details not provided

* PIO Order/Decision Date

3 Comments

Whatever comments you make, it is your responsibility to use facts. You may not make unwanted imputations against any body which may be baseless otherwise commentator itself will be responsible for the derogatory remarks made against any body proved to be false at any appropriate forum.

  1. Whether any PIO will provide information to the information seekers if there is no fear of penal action imposed under section 20 of the Right to Information Act 2005 by the information commission, government of Uttar Pradesh. Undoubtedly the matter is serious as both the public authorities are failed to provide information under Right to Information Act 2005 concerning the recovery of imposed penalties which means no recovery is made after order of penalty on the erring public information officers. This reflects sheer anarchy in the working of the government of Uttar Pradesh.

    ReplyDelete
  2. सोचिए 5 वर्ष बीत गए ₹25000 चार जन सूचना अधिकारियों के ऊपर पेनाल्टी लगाई गई राज्य सूचना आयोग उत्तर प्रदेश द्वारा उसकी रिकवरी का आदेश जिलाधिकारी मिर्जापुर के पास आया अभी तक वह धनराज वसूली नहीं गई क्या यह अराजकता नहीं है योगी आदित्यनाथ जी किस सुशासन की बात करते हैं क्या अराजकता को भी सुशासन कहते हैं सुशासन तो उसे कहते हैं जहां पर कानून का राज्य को यहां तो अराजकता का राज्य कैसे सामान्य जनता इस भ्रष्टाचार की दुनिया में जिए गी

    ReplyDelete
  3. अब इससे बड़ा भ्रष्टाचार क्या होगा सोचिए जिस जन सूचना अधिकार 2005 को कांग्रेस सरकार ने कानून बनाया उसी कानून को भाजपा सरकार ने खत्म कर डाला अपने रहस्यमई कार्यशैली से आज एक भी सूचना है इसलिए नहीं प्राप्त होती हैं क्योंकि सभी जन सूचना अधिकारी यह जानते हैं कि किसी भी सूचना आयुक्त में उनके खिलाफ कार्यवाही करने की क्षमता ही नहीं है यदि भूल चूक से कर भी देते हैं तो वह उसे माफ करा लेंगे से यदि कोई दंड निरूपित कर देता है से यदि कोई दंड आरोपित कर देता है

    ReplyDelete
Previous Post Next Post