Again C.O. City, Prabhat Ray submitted parrot report in the representation of Archana Dubey on PMO portal reflect tyranny and arbitrariness




Grievance Status for registration number : PMOPG/E/2022/0240013

Grievance Concerns To
Name Of Complainant
Archana Dubey
Date of Receipt
11/09/2022
Received By Ministry/Department
Prime Ministers Office
Grievance Description
Grievance Status for registration number: PMOPG/E/2022/0209443 Grievance Concerns to Name of Complainant Archana Dubey Date of Receipt 07/08/2022
Received By Ministry/Department Prime Ministers Office
Grievance Status for registration number: PMOPG/E/2022/0214959 Grievance Concerns To Name Of Complainant Archana Dubey
Date of Receipt 13/08/2022 Received By Ministry/Department Prime Ministers Office
Already police have fabricated my husband Mr. Amit Kumar Dubey seven times under section 151/107/116 Cr.P.C. for submitting representation before the police. Police, instead of taking action in the matter, are threatening my husband not to submit any representation on the Jansunwai portal of the government of Uttar Pradesh. They are suppressing my voice to raise against injustice made by my younger brother with the help of his gangster friends. In the aforementioned case/complaints submitted on the PMO Portal, C.O. City did not consider it fit to invite me to pay heed to my grievances and redress it but preferred to submit an inconsistent and arbitrary report on the portal. Police itself promotes criminal elements by providing fabricated concocted stories in the form of reports.
पुलिस स्वयं रिपोर्ट के रूप में मनगढ़ंत कहानी उपलब्ध कराकर आपराधिक तत्वों को बढ़ावा देती है

Sir if the matter is subjudice in the court, how can opposite party can break the wall without consensus of both the parties?

महोदय, यदि मामला न्यायालय में विचाराधीन है, तो विरोधी पक्ष दोनों पक्षों की सहमति के बिना दीवार कैसे तोड़ सकता है? Undoubtedly, it is a miracle of illegal gratification which caused police not to touch the core issue.
निस्संदेह, यह अवैध संतुष्टि का चमत्कार है जिसके कारण पुलिस ने मूल मुद्दे को नहीं छुआ
Opposite party is humiliating the husband of the victim on the mobile phone which audio record available on the internet, but police overlook things unless serious crimes do not take place.

विरोधी पक्ष पीड़िता के पति को मोबाइल फोन पर अपमानित कर रहा है जिसका ऑडियो रिकॉर्ड इंटरनेट पर उपलब्ध है लेकिन जब तक गंभीर अपराध नहीं होते तब तक पुलिस चीजों को नजरअंदाज कर देती है

Whether it is not obligatory duty of C.O. City, Mr Prabhat Ray to listen the audio record hurling abuses by my brother on me and underestimating the authority of the police to know the real status of the police in the district Mirzapur because of its cryptic dealings. For more details, vide attached documents and to hear audio, visit the link given in PDF in the browser. 
आपके आवेदक ने माननीय महोदय के समक्ष 30 अप्रैल 2022 को अपराधियों के खिलाफ अभ्यावेदन प्रस्तुत किया जब उन्होंने आवेदक और उसके पति पर हमला किया और यह सबसे खेदजनक है कि संबंधित कर्मचारियों द्वारा तीन महीने से अधिक समय के बाद भी कोई कार्रवाई नहीं की गई
What is your response? आपकी प्रतिक्रिया क्या है?
Since you did not take any action in the matter therefore you avoided the submission and filled the report by ambiguous reporting.
चूंकि आपने इस मामले में कोई कार्रवाई नहीं की, इसलिए आपने रिपोर्ट प्रस्तुत करने से परहेज किया और अस्पष्ट रिपोर्टिंग द्वारा रिपोर्ट भर दी।
Instead of submitting cluttered on the portal, you might be adopted a logistic approach in the matter.
पोर्टल पर कूड़ा करकट सबमिट करने के बजाय आप मामले में लॉजिस्टिक/तार्किक अप्रोच अपनाएं
Everyone knows that proceedings under Section 107/116. of the Cr. P.C. are only preventive measures and not pure criminal proceedings, but such proceedings are of quasi-judicial nature. Whoever seek redressal of their grievances by submitting online applications on the Jansunwai portal of the government of Uttar Pradesh, concerned sub-inspector fabricate them under Section 107/116. of the Cr. P.C in most of the cases. YOU have already misused this tool six times on my husband instead of ensuring the compliance of agreements made between parties.
Grievance Document
Current Status
Case closed
Date of Action
28/09/2022
Remarks
अधीनस्थ अधिकारी के स्तर पर निस्तारित महोदय, जाँच आख्या संलग्न है शिकायतकर्ता उपरोक्त की जांच आख्या संलग्न है
Reply Document
Rating
Poor
Rating Remarks
There is substantial evidence of hurling abuses by the younger brother of the husband of the applicant to her husband but police is saying that such things are quite common in our society and police do not take any action in such matters. It is quite obvious that audio clips are circulated from police to public but who dares to ask police that such offensive activities must be curbed. It seems that there rule of forest in the government of Uttar Pradesh as rule of law has been substituted by the rule of forest quite obvious from the arbitrariness and tyranny in the working of the police in the state of Uttar Pradesh. Think about the report of circle officer city Mr. Prabhat Ray who is justifying the quarrels and loggerheads on the ground of bio relations and established relations. Whether a brother is allowed to abuse his elder brother and its solution is section 151/107/116 of Cr/P.C. ipso facto from the report of circle officer city Mr. Prabhat Ray.
Officer Concerns To
Officer Name
Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary)
Organisation name
Government of Uttar Pradesh
Contact Address
Chief Minister Secretariat , Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow
Email Address
bhaskar.12214@gov.in
Contact Number
05222226350
Beerbhadra Singh

To write blogs and applications for the deprived sections who can not raise their voices to stop their human rights violations by corrupt bureaucrats and executives.

Post a Comment

Whatever comments you make, it is your responsibility to use facts. You may not make unwanted imputations against any body which may be baseless otherwise commentator itself will be responsible for the derogatory remarks made against any body proved to be false at any appropriate forum.

Previous Post Next Post