.png)
Registration Number PCLKO/A/2022/60033
Name Yogi M P Singh
Date of Filing 08/04/2022
Status APPEAL DISPOSED OF as on 16/06/2022
Reply :- file attached.
View Document
Nodal Officer Details
Name AJAY KUMAR
Telephone Number 9454401089
Email-ID jansuchanalko@gmail.com
Online RTI Appeal Form Details
Public Authority Details :-
* Public Authority POLICE COMMISSIONER OFFICE LUCKNOW
Personal Details:-
* Name Yogi M P Singh
Gender Male
* Address Mohalla Surekapuram , Shri Laxmi Narayan Baikunth Mahadev Mandir, Jabalpur Road
Pincode 231001
State Uttar Pradesh
Educational Status Literate
Phone Number Details not provided
Mobile Number +91-7379105911
Email-ID myogimpsingh[at]gmail[dot]com
Citizenship Indian
* Is the Applicant Below Poverty Line ? No
First Appeal Details u/s 19(1) :-
Registration Number PCLKO/A/2022/60033
Date of Filing 08/04/2022
Concerned Appellate Authority RAIES AKHTAR
Phone No 9454400531
Email Id dcphqoffice@gmail.com
* Ground For Appeal Provided Incomplete,Misleading or False Information
((Description of Information sought (upto 500 characters) )
* Prayer or Relief Sought Registration Number PCLKO/R/2022/80039 Name Yogi M P Singh Date of Filing 02/03/2022 Status REQUEST DISPOSED OF as on 31/03/2022For more feedback, vide attached document to the appeal representation. Right to information act 2005 was introduced by the government of India to promote transparency and accountability in the working of the public authority and here assistant public information officer Cant repeatedly provided information that Ashiana police acted under the direction of the court as Anuradha Singh name changed Aradhana Singh submitted petition before the court under sub section 3 of section 156 of the criminal panel code and court give the direction to register first information report in the matter after investigation.
This implies that Ashiana police station which was the party number 3 in the high court case overlooked the verdict passed by the Lucknow bench are the high court of Judicature at Allahabad and followed the direction of the lower court by overlooking the verdict of the High court which was binding on the Ashiana police, home secretary and commissioner of police as home secretary was the party number 1, commissioner of police was the party number 2 and Ashiana police was the party number 3 in the case in which honourable high court of Judicature at Allahabad decided the verdict.
Consequently entire police personal who abused their post and position must be subjected to the penal proceedings of the law of land for violating verdict passed by the Lucknow bench of the high court of judicature at Allahabad. Undoubtedly lower court Lucknow had passed the order to register the first information report but it did not say to overlook the verdict delivered by the Lucknow bench off the High court of judicature at Allahabad and this blunder was done by Ashiana police itself. Now the time has come when the Lucknow police may correct stand by taking the action against the wrongdoer police personnel who committed wrong by disobeying the order passed by the Lucknow bench of the high court of judicature at Allahabad. Think about the gravity of situation that when a single fish can make dirty entire water of the pond then think about a Syndicate of corrupt police personnel is working in the department of police in the commissionerate Lucknow so what would be outcome if no action will be taken by the accountable public functionaries in the office of the public authority police at Lucknow. Think about the gravity situation that concerned police personnel took under teeth the direction of the Lucknow bench of the high court of Judicature at Allahabad because of the corruption prevalent in the office of the public authority.
Supporting document ((only pdf upto 1 MB))
RTI Application Details u/s 6(1) :-
Registration Number PCLKO/R/2022/80039
Date of Filing 02/03/2022
PIO of Public Authority approached SHRAVAN KUMAR SINGH
Designation ADDITIONAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
Phone No 9454401089
Email Id
PIO Order/Decision Number Details not provided
* PIO Order/Decision Date
This implies that Ashiana police station which was the party number 3 in the high court case overlooked the verdict passed by the Lucknow bench are the high court of Judicature at Allahabad and followed the direction of the lower court by overlooking the verdict of the High court which was binding on the Ashiana police, home secretary and commissioner of police as home secretary was the party number 1, commissioner of police was the party number 2 and Ashiana police was the party number 3 in the case in which honourable high court of Judicature at Allahabad decided the verdict.
ReplyDelete