C.C.T.V. Camera removed earlier to facilitate extortion from overloaded trucks now planning to again install as reflection of honesty


Grievance Status for registration number : GOVUP/E/2022/32442
Grievance Concerns To
Name Of Complainant
Yogi M. P. Singh
Date of Receipt
Received By Ministry/Department
Uttar Pradesh
Grievance Description
The matter concerns case number-20075 (63) /2020-21 dated 08/04/2021 coram of member Justice K.P. Singh in the Uttar Pradesh Human Rights Commission. Order passed is as follows.
I have perused the allegations made in the complaint of the complainant Yogi M. P. Singh dated 04 October 2020.
No useful purpose would be served in keeping the present complaint pending. Keeping in view the nature of allegations made in complaint it would be appropriate to send a copy of the complaint to the district magistrate Mirzapur who shall look into the matter and do the needful in accordance with the law at his end under the intimation of this commission as early as possible.
With the above order the complaint is finally disposed of. This order was signed by member Justice K.P. Singh in the Uttar Pradesh Human Rights Commission on 08/04/2021.
It is most surprising that no action was taken by the district magistrate Mirzapur on the aforementioned communication cum order as aforementioned.
For more feedback, vide attached document to the grievance.
C.C.T.V. Camera was already installed but it was removed by concerned staff to facilitate illegal collection through extortions from heavy and light vehicles.
Undoubtedly they escaped from enquiry but when their inactivity is proved fatal, then enquiry must be carried out in a transparent and accountable manner that who removed the installed C.C.T.V. Cameras if concerned are subordinates, then under whom order and why F.I.R. was not lodged in the matter despite the demand from the public side quite obvious from the following representation?

वसूली के आरोप सारहीन है सामान्य है २०० ओवरलोड ट्रको में १८ पर कारवाही का दावा पर वह दावा भी गलत क्यों की आकडे नौ पर ही कार्यवाही पुष्ट कर रहे है सोचिये बारगेनिंग नही तो और क्या एक तरफ अपनी दामन बचाने के लिए पुलिस कप्तान जिला मजिस्ट्रेट सब का नाम ले रहे है और क्लोज्ड सर्किट कैमरा किसने हटाया कन्नी काट रहे है अब तीनो लोगो के अलावा उस कैमरा को कौन हटा सकता है यदि पब्लिक हटाती तो प्रथम सूचना रिपोर्ट दर्ज हो चुकी होती विडियो फुटेज का साक्ष्य मिटाने के लिए इतना बड़ा खेल खेला गया और वसूली कितनी बड़ी है वह तो मीडिया चीख चीख कर बता रही है

Here this question arises if the district administration Mirzapur had to install the C.C.T.V. Camera on the site, why, they removed it from the site two years ago? Whether it is not the reflection of the deep rooted corruption in the government machinery? Today they are worried about it because Shastri Bridge has been damaged because of their carelessness. If they had taken timely action, on my representations, then this bridge did not damage and government and public did not face the risk to travel on a damaged bridge which may cause havoc at any time. Sequence to fill the pocket should never break whatever prices may be redeemed by the public.
Grievance Document
Current Status
Case closed
Date of Action
अधीनस्थ अधिकारी के स्तर पर निस्तारित अधीनस्थ अधिकारी के स्तर पर निस्तारित महोदय जांच आख्या संलग्न है आवेदक उपरोक्त की जांच आख्या संलग्न है श्रीमान् जी आख्या संलग्न है
Reply Document
Rating Remarks
From the Report it is quite obvious that concerned investigation officer has no power to investigate the allegations made by the complainant quite obvious from the contents of the report. On the other side of screen Yogi Adityanath itself claiming to act against the corruption growing in the government machinery sharply but on the other side of the screen supporting the corrupt public staff in the government machinery quite obvious from the working style of the public functionaries in the Government of Uttar Pradesh. Where is the transparency and accountabilty in the working of the public authorities in the Government of Uttar Pradesh where no information is made available to the information seekers under right to information act 2005 and the wrongdoer public information officers of the government are never punished because of the cryptic working style of the government. To remove the corruption from the government machinery there must be firm resolve in the mind of the administrator .
Officer Concerns To
Officer Name
Shri Bhaskar Pandey (Joint Secretary)
Organisation name
Government of Uttar Pradesh
Contact Address
Chief Minister Secretariat , Room No. 321, U.P. Secretariat, Lucknow
Email Address
Contact Number

An anti-corruption crusader. Motive to build a strong society based on the principle of universal brotherhood. Human rights defender and RTI activist. Working for the betterment of societies and as an anti-corruption crusader for more than 25 years. Our sole motive is to raise the voices of weaker and downtrodden sections of the society and safeguard their human rights. Our motive is to promote the religion of universal brotherhood among the various castes communities of different religions. Man is great by his deeds and character.

Previous Post Next Post